Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
152 lines (122 loc) · 15 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

152 lines (122 loc) · 15 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for juanfont/headscale

Objective: Compromise application using Headscale by exploiting weaknesses or vulnerabilities within Headscale itself.

Attack Tree Visualization

Root: [CRITICAL NODE] Compromise Application via Headscale

├── [CRITICAL NODE] 1. Compromise Headscale Server [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   ├── [HIGH RISK PATH] 1.1.1. Identify and exploit known CVEs in Headscale version
│   ├── [CRITICAL NODE] 1.2. Exploit Headscale API Vulnerabilities [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   ├── [HIGH RISK PATH] 1.2.1. API Authentication Bypass
│   │   │   ├── [HIGH RISK PATH] 1.2.1.1. Weak or default API keys
│   ├── [HIGH RISK PATH] 1.3.1. Exploit OS vulnerabilities on Headscale server
│   ├── [HIGH RISK PATH] 1.3.3.2. Weak database credentials
│   ├── [CRITICAL NODE] 1.4. Configuration and Deployment Weaknesses [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   ├── [HIGH RISK PATH] 1.4.1. Default or weak administrative credentials
│   │   ├── [HIGH RISK PATH] 1.4.5. Insufficient logging and monitoring
│   └── [HIGH RISK PATH] 1.5. Social Engineering Headscale Administrators
│       └── [HIGH RISK PATH] 1.5.1. Phishing for admin credentials

├── [CRITICAL NODE] 2. Compromise Headscale Client Node [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   ├── [HIGH RISK PATH] 2.1.1. Identify and exploit known CVEs in Tailscale client version
│   ├── [HIGH RISK PATH] 2.2.1. Exploit vulnerabilities in client operating system
│   ├── [HIGH RISK PATH] 2.2.2. Exploit vulnerabilities in other applications running on the client node
│   │   └── [HIGH RISK PATH] 2.2.2.1. Use compromised application to access Headscale client process or keys
│   ├── [HIGH RISK PATH] 2.2.3. Malware infection on client node
│   ├── [CRITICAL NODE] 2.3. Credential Theft from Client Node [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   ├── [HIGH RISK PATH] 2.3.1. Steal Tailscale client private key
│   │   │   ├── [HIGH RISK PATH] 2.3.1.1. Access key file from disk (if permissions are weak)
│   │   └── [HIGH RISK PATH] 2.3.3. Compromise user account on client node with Tailscale access

Attack Tree Path: 1. Compromise Headscale Server (Critical Node, High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vectors:

    • Exploiting vulnerabilities in the Headscale server software itself.
    • Exploiting vulnerabilities in the underlying operating system of the Headscale server.
    • Exploiting weaknesses in the Headscale API.
    • Exploiting misconfigurations in the Headscale server deployment.
    • Social engineering attacks targeting Headscale administrators.

  • Impact: Full control over the Headscale server, leading to compromise of the entire Headscale-managed network and all connected applications and data.

    • 1.1.1. Identify and exploit known CVEs in Headscale version (High-Risk Path):

      • Attack Vector: Exploiting publicly known vulnerabilities (CVEs) in the deployed version of Headscale server software.
      • Breakdown: Attackers search for known vulnerabilities affecting the specific Headscale version in use. If found, they utilize readily available exploits or develop their own to gain unauthorized access.
      • Mitigation: Maintain up-to-date Headscale server software by applying security patches promptly. Regularly monitor security advisories and CVE databases.

    • 1.2. Exploit Headscale API Vulnerabilities (Critical Node, High-Risk Path):

      • Attack Vector: Exploiting weaknesses in the Headscale API, which is used for management and control.

      • Breakdown: Attackers target the API to bypass authentication, authorization, or inject malicious commands. Successful exploitation grants control over Headscale server functionalities.

      • Mitigation: Implement strong API authentication and authorization mechanisms. Thoroughly validate all API inputs to prevent injection attacks. Regularly audit API security.

      • 1.2.1. API Authentication Bypass (High-Risk Path):

        • Attack Vector: Bypassing the API authentication mechanisms to gain unauthorized access.

        • Breakdown: Attackers attempt to circumvent authentication checks, potentially through weak or default credentials, logic flaws in the authentication process, or other bypass techniques.

        • Mitigation: Enforce strong, unique, and regularly rotated API keys. Implement robust authentication logic and avoid default credentials.

        • 1.2.1.1. Weak or default API keys (High-Risk Path):

          • Attack Vector: Using default or easily guessable API keys to authenticate to the Headscale API.
          • Breakdown: If default API keys are not changed after installation or if weak, predictable keys are used, attackers can easily gain administrative access to the Headscale API.
          • Mitigation: Force the generation of strong, random API keys during setup. Prohibit the use of default or weak keys.

    • 1.3.1. Exploit OS vulnerabilities on Headscale server (High-Risk Path):

      • Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities in the operating system running the Headscale server.
      • Breakdown: Attackers target known vulnerabilities in the server's OS (e.g., Linux, Windows) to gain unauthorized access and potentially escalate privileges to compromise the entire server.
      • Mitigation: Maintain up-to-date operating system by applying security patches promptly. Harden the OS by disabling unnecessary services and configuring strong security settings.

    • 1.3.3.2. Weak database credentials (High-Risk Path):

      • Attack Vector: Using default or weak passwords for the database account used by Headscale.
      • Breakdown: If the database credentials are weak, attackers can gain unauthorized access to the database, potentially compromising sensitive Headscale data and potentially the server itself.
      • Mitigation: Enforce strong, unique passwords for database accounts. Regularly audit and rotate database credentials.

    • 1.4. Configuration and Deployment Weaknesses (Critical Node, High-Risk Path):

      • Attack Vector: Exploiting insecure configurations and deployment practices of the Headscale server.

      • Breakdown: Misconfigurations can create vulnerabilities that attackers can easily exploit. This includes weak credentials, insecure TLS settings, overly permissive firewalls, and insufficient logging.

      • Mitigation: Follow security best practices for Headscale server configuration and deployment. Implement secure configuration management and regularly audit configurations.

      • 1.4.1. Default or weak administrative credentials (High-Risk Path):

        • Attack Vector: Using default or easily guessable administrative credentials for Headscale server access.
        • Breakdown: If default administrative passwords are not changed after installation or if weak, predictable passwords are used, attackers can easily gain administrative access to the Headscale server.
        • Mitigation: Force the setting of strong, unique administrative passwords during setup. Prohibit the use of default or weak passwords. Implement multi-factor authentication if possible.

      • 1.4.5. Insufficient logging and monitoring (High-Risk Path):

        • Attack Vector: Lack of adequate logging and monitoring makes it difficult to detect and respond to attacks.
        • Breakdown: Without sufficient logs, attackers can operate undetected for longer periods, increasing the impact of a successful compromise. Incident response is also significantly hampered.
        • Mitigation: Implement comprehensive logging for Headscale server activities, API access, and system events. Set up monitoring and alerting for suspicious activities.

    • 1.5. Social Engineering Headscale Administrators (High-Risk Path):

      • Attack Vector: Manipulating Headscale administrators into revealing credentials or performing actions that compromise security.

      • Breakdown: Attackers use psychological manipulation tactics, such as phishing, to trick administrators into divulging sensitive information or granting unauthorized access.

      • Mitigation: Provide security awareness training to administrators, focusing on social engineering tactics and phishing. Implement strong password policies and multi-factor authentication.

      • 1.5.1. Phishing for admin credentials (High-Risk Path):

        • Attack Vector: Using phishing emails or websites to trick administrators into revealing their Headscale administrative credentials.
        • Breakdown: Attackers create fake emails or websites that mimic legitimate Headscale login pages to steal administrator usernames and passwords.
        • Mitigation: Train administrators to identify phishing emails. Implement email security measures to filter phishing attempts. Enforce multi-factor authentication for administrative accounts.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Compromise Headscale Client Node (Critical Node, High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vectors:

    • Exploiting vulnerabilities in the Tailscale client software (used by Headscale clients).
    • Exploiting vulnerabilities in the operating system of the client node.
    • Exploiting vulnerabilities in other applications running on the client node to pivot to the Tailscale client.
    • Infecting the client node with malware.
    • Stealing Tailscale client credentials from the client node.

  • Impact: Gain access to the Headscale-managed network from the perspective of the compromised client node, potentially allowing lateral movement and access to resources within the VPN.

    • 2.1.1. Identify and exploit known CVEs in Tailscale client version (High-Risk Path):

      • Attack Vector: Exploiting publicly known vulnerabilities (CVEs) in the deployed version of Tailscale client software.
      • Breakdown: Similar to server-side CVE exploitation, attackers target known vulnerabilities in the Tailscale client software running on client nodes.
      • Mitigation: Maintain up-to-date Tailscale client software by applying security patches promptly. Implement automated update mechanisms if possible.

    • 2.2.1. Exploit vulnerabilities in client operating system (High-Risk Path):

      • Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities in the operating system running on the client node.
      • Breakdown: Attackers target known vulnerabilities in the client's OS to gain unauthorized access to the client machine and potentially pivot to the Tailscale client.
      • Mitigation: Maintain up-to-date operating systems on client nodes by applying security patches promptly. Harden client OS configurations.

    • 2.2.2. Exploit vulnerabilities in other applications running on the client node (High-Risk Path):

      • Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities in other applications installed on the client node to gain initial access and then pivot to the Tailscale client.

      • Breakdown: Attackers compromise a vulnerable application on the client node and then use this foothold to access the Tailscale client process or its stored credentials.

      • 2.2.2.1. Use compromised application to access Headscale client process or keys (High-Risk Path):

        • Attack Vector: After compromising another application on the client, attackers pivot to target the Tailscale client process or its stored keys.
        • Breakdown: Attackers leverage their access from the compromised application to read Tailscale client configuration files, memory, or processes to extract keys or gain control over the Tailscale client.
        • Mitigation: Practice application security for all software on client nodes. Implement least privilege principles to limit the impact of application compromises.

    • 2.2.3. Malware infection on client node (High-Risk Path):

      • Attack Vector: Infecting the client node with malware to gain unauthorized access.
      • Breakdown: Attackers use various methods (e.g., phishing, drive-by downloads, software vulnerabilities) to install malware on client machines. Malware can then be used to steal credentials, control the client, or pivot to the VPN network.
      • Mitigation: Implement endpoint security solutions (antivirus, EDR). Educate users about malware threats and safe computing practices.

    • 2.3. Credential Theft from Client Node (Critical Node, High-Risk Path):

      • Attack Vector: Stealing Tailscale client credentials (private keys, authentication tokens) from the client node.

      • Breakdown: If attackers gain access to a client node (through malware, vulnerabilities, or physical access), they may attempt to steal Tailscale client credentials to impersonate the client and gain VPN access.

      • Mitigation: Securely store Tailscale client credentials on client nodes. Implement file system permissions to protect key files. Consider disk encryption.

      • 2.3.1. Steal Tailscale client private key (High-Risk Path):

        • Attack Vector: Directly stealing the Tailscale client's private key file from the client node.

        • Breakdown: Attackers attempt to locate and access the Tailscale client's private key file on disk. If file permissions are weak, they can read the key and use it to impersonate the client from another machine.

        • 2.3.1.1. Access key file from disk (if permissions are weak) (High-Risk Path):

          • Attack Vector: Exploiting weak file system permissions to access the Tailscale client private key file.
          • Breakdown: If the Tailscale client key file is not properly protected with restrictive file permissions, attackers with local access to the client machine can read the file and steal the private key.
          • Mitigation: Ensure that Tailscale client key files are protected with appropriate file system permissions, restricting access to only the necessary user accounts.

      • 2.3.3. Compromise user account on client node with Tailscale access (High-Risk Path):

        • Attack Vector: Compromising a user account on the client node that has access to the Tailscale client and its credentials.
        • Breakdown: Attackers compromise a user account through password cracking, social engineering, or other means. Once they have access to a user account, they can potentially access the Tailscale client and its credentials.
        • Mitigation: Enforce strong password policies for user accounts on client nodes. Implement multi-factor authentication for user logins. Monitor user account activity for suspicious behavior.