Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
402 lines (331 loc) · 31.1 KB

sec-design.md

File metadata and controls

402 lines (331 loc) · 31.1 KB

Project Design Document: Knative Community Platform (Improved)

Project Name: Knative Community Platform

Project Repository: https://github.com/knative/community

Document Version: 1.1

Date: 2023-10-27

Author: Bard (AI Expert in Software, Cloud, and Cybersecurity Architecture)

Changes from Version 1.0:

  • Improved clarity and conciseness throughout the document.
  • Enhanced the Security Considerations section with more specific examples and mitigations.
  • Expanded the Threat Modeling section to provide more actionable steps and examples.
  • Refined Mermaid diagrams for better readability.
  • Added a section on Data Storage and Persistence.

1. Introduction

This document details the design of the Knative Community Platform, represented by the GitHub repository https://github.com/knative/community. This platform acts as the central online presence for the Knative community, offering resources, documentation, and tools to foster collaboration, communication, and contributions to the Knative project.

This design document serves as the foundation for future threat modeling exercises. It comprehensively describes the platform's components, data flows, and interactions, highlighting potential areas of security concern.

2. Project Overview

The Knative Community Platform is not a monolithic application but a collection of resources and processes managed within the knative/community GitHub repository. Its primary objectives are:

  • Centralized Information Hub: To be the definitive source for Knative community information, including governance, roles, meeting schedules, and communication channels.
  • Contribution Enablement: To guide both new and experienced contributors on how to participate in Knative projects across code, documentation, and community engagement.
  • Communication and Collaboration Facilitation: To provide channels and tools for community members to interact, exchange ideas, and resolve issues effectively.
  • Transparent Process Documentation: To clearly define and document governance, decision-making, and community management processes for transparency and accessibility.
  • Community Website Hosting: To maintain the source code and content for the official Knative community website, representing the community's public image.

Target Audience:

  • Knative Community Members: Encompassing developers, operators, users, and anyone interested in Knative technologies.
  • Knative Project Leadership: Individuals responsible for the strategic direction and overall health of the Knative project and community.
  • Prospective Contributors: Individuals seeking to contribute to Knative for the first time.
  • Security Auditors and Researchers: Individuals tasked with evaluating the security posture of the Knative community platform.

3. System Architecture

The Knative Community Platform's architecture is primarily based on a static website generated from Markdown content within the GitHub repository, leveraging the GitHub platform for collaboration and communication functionalities.

3.1. Components

The core components of the Knative Community Platform are:

  • 3.1.1. GitHub Repository (knative/community):

    • Description: The central repository hosting all source files, documentation, website content, and community process definitions.
    • Functionality:
      • Version Control (Git): Manages all changes to the platform's content and configuration, providing a complete history and rollback capability.
      • Content Storage (Markdown, Static Assets): Stores Markdown files for website content, images, and other static assets.
      • Issue Tracking (GitHub Issues): Used for reporting bugs, suggesting enhancements, and general discussions related to the community platform itself.
      • Contribution Management (Pull Requests): Facilitates contributions to the platform's content and website through a review and merge process.
      • Asynchronous Communication (GitHub Discussions): Enables structured, threaded discussions within the community, categorized by topic.
      • Static Website Hosting (Potentially GitHub Pages): May host the static community website directly from the repository, depending on the chosen deployment strategy.
      • Automation (GitHub Workflows/Actions): Automates tasks such as website deployment, content validation, and community management workflows (e.g., issue labeling).

  • 3.1.2. Community Website (Externally Hosted - e.g., Netlify, Vercel, Kubernetes):

    • Description: A static website generated from the content within the knative/community repository. This is the public-facing interface of the community.
    • Functionality:
      • Information Dissemination: Provides comprehensive information about Knative, the community structure, contribution guidelines, governance policies, and upcoming events.
      • Documentation Access: Offers readily accessible links to official Knative documentation and community-specific guides and tutorials.
      • Community Resource Aggregation: Provides a central directory of communication channels (Slack, mailing lists), meeting schedules, and other essential community resources.
      • News and Updates (Blog/News Section): May feature blog posts, news articles, and announcements relevant to the Knative community and project developments.

  • 3.1.3. External Communication Channels (Linked from Website):

    • Description: External platforms utilized for real-time and asynchronous communication within the Knative community, linked from the community website.
    • Examples:
      • Slack (Knative Workspace): For real-time chat, quick questions, informal discussions, and community building.
      • Mailing Lists (Google Groups): For asynchronous communication, announcements, formal discussions, and broader community updates.
      • Forums (Optional - e.g., Discourse): For structured discussions, Q&A, and long-form conversations (may be implemented in the future).
      • Social Media (e.g., Twitter/X, LinkedIn): For announcements, community outreach, and broader public communication.
    • Functionality:
      • Real-time Interaction (Slack): Facilitates immediate communication and community engagement.
      • Asynchronous Communication (Mailing Lists, Forums): Supports in-depth discussions, announcements, and persistent communication records.

  • 3.1.4. Contribution Automation Tools (Scripts, Bots within Repository):

    • Description: Scripts, bots, or automated tools hosted within the repository to streamline community management tasks and facilitate contributions.
    • Examples:
      • Issue Labeling Bots (GitHub Actions): Automatically categorize and label GitHub issues based on keywords or predefined rules.
      • PR Validation Scripts (GitHub Actions): Enforce code style guidelines, content consistency checks, and basic security scans on pull requests.
      • Website Deployment Automation (GitHub Actions): Automate the process of building and deploying the community website upon content changes.
    • Functionality:
      • Process Automation: Reduces manual effort in community management and content maintenance.
      • Consistency Enforcement: Ensures adherence to community standards and contribution guidelines.
      • Efficiency Improvement: Streamlines community workflows and accelerates contribution processes.

3.2. Architecture Diagram (Mermaid)

graph LR
    subgraph "GitHub Repository 'knative/community'"
        A["'GitHub Repository'\n('knative/community')"]
        B["'Markdown Content'\n& 'Static Assets'"]
        C["'Issue Tracker'"]
        D["'Pull Requests'"]
        E["'Discussions'"]
        F["'Workflows/Actions'\n('Automation')"]
        A --> B
        A --> C
        A --> D
        A --> E
        A --> F
    end

    subgraph "Community Website (Hosted Externally)"
        G["'Community Website'\n('Static Site')"]
        H["'Web Server'\n(e.g., Netlify, Vercel, Kubernetes)"]
        B --> G & H  -- "'Content Generation & Hosting'"
    end

    subgraph "External Communication Channels"
        I["'Slack'\n('Knative Workspace')"]
        J["'Mailing Lists'\n('Google Groups')"]
        K["'Forums'\n('Optional')"]
        L["'Social Media'"]
        G --> I & J & K & L -- "'Links & Information'"
    end

    subgraph "Community Members"
        M["'Community Member'\n('User, Contributor')"]
    end

    M --> A -- "'Contribute, Report Issues, Discuss'"
    M --> G -- "'Access Information'"
    M --> I & J & K & L -- "'Communicate & Collaborate'"
    F --> H -- "'Website Deployment'"
Loading

4. Data Flow

The primary data flow within the Knative Community Platform centers around content creation, contribution management, and information dissemination to the community.

  • 4.1. Content Creation and Management Workflow:

    1. Authorized community members (typically maintainers or designated content contributors) create or update website content in Markdown format within the knative/community GitHub repository.
    2. Content changes are committed and pushed to the repository using Git version control.
    3. GitHub Actions workflows (defined in .github/workflows) automatically trigger content validation checks (e.g., Markdown linting, link checking).
    4. A static website generator (likely Hugo, based on common static site practices) processes the Markdown content and static assets to generate HTML, CSS, and JavaScript files.
    5. The generated static website files are deployed to an external web server (e.g., Netlify, Vercel, or a Kubernetes cluster) via automated deployment pipelines (GitHub Actions).

  • 4.2. Contribution Flow (Pull Request Based):

    1. A community member identifies an area for contribution (e.g., documentation improvement, website update, bug fix).
    2. They create a personal fork of the knative/community repository on GitHub.
    3. They implement their changes within their forked repository.
    4. They submit a Pull Request (PR) from their fork to the main knative/community repository, proposing their changes for review and integration.
    5. Knative maintainers review the PR, provide feedback, and may request revisions or clarifications.
    6. Automated checks (GitHub Actions) may run on the PR to ensure code quality, content consistency, and adherence to guidelines.
    7. Upon approval by maintainers and successful automated checks, the PR is merged into the main branch of the knative/community repository.
    8. The community website is automatically updated to reflect the merged changes through the CI/CD pipeline.

  • 4.3. Issue Reporting and Discussion Flow (GitHub Issues):

    1. A community member encounters an issue, has a question, or wants to propose a feature related to the community platform.
    2. They create a new issue in the knative/community GitHub repository's issue tracker, providing details about the issue or proposal.
    3. Community members and maintainers engage in discussions within the issue comments to clarify the issue, propose solutions, or provide feedback.
    4. Solutions or resolutions are developed and implemented, often through Pull Requests linked to the issue.
    5. Once the issue is resolved or addressed, it is closed by a maintainer.

  • 4.4. Information Access Flow (Website Browsing):

    1. A community member accesses the community website by entering the website URL in a web browser.
    2. The web server hosting the static website serves the pre-generated HTML, CSS, and JavaScript files to the user's browser.
    3. The user navigates the website to access information about Knative, community resources, documentation, contribution guidelines, and other relevant content.
    4. The website provides links to external communication channels (Slack, mailing lists) for further interaction and community engagement.

4.5. Data Flow Diagram (Mermaid)

graph LR
    subgraph "Community Member Actions"
        CM_Edit["'Edit Markdown Content'"]
        CM_PR["'Submit Pull Request'"]
        CM_Issue["'Report Issue'"]
        CM_Browse["'Browse Website'"]
        CM_Communicate["'Communicate'\n('Slack, Mailing List')"]
    end

    subgraph "GitHub Repository"
        Repo["'GitHub Repository'\n('knative/community')"]
        Repo_Content["'Markdown Content'"]
        Repo_PR["'Pull Requests'"]
        Repo_Issues["'Issue Tracker'"]
    end

    subgraph "Website Infrastructure"
        Website_Gen["'Static Site Generator'"]
        Web_Server["'Web Server'"]
        Website["'Community Website'"]
    end

    CM_Edit --> Repo_Content -- "'Commit & Push'"
    CM_PR --> Repo_PR -- "'Submit PR'"
    CM_Issue --> Repo_Issues -- "'Create Issue'"
    CM_Browse --> Website -- "'Access Website'"
    CM_Communicate --> External_Comm -- "'Join Channels'"

    Repo_Content --> Website_Gen -- "'Generate Static Site'"
    Website_Gen --> Web_Server -- "'Deploy'"
    Web_Server --> Website -- "'Host Website'"
    Website --> CM_Browse -- "'Serve Website Content'"

    Repo_PR --> Repo -- "'Merge PR'"
    Repo_Issues --> Repo -- "'Track Issues'"

    subgraph "External Communication Channels"
        External_Comm["'Slack, Mailing Lists, etc.'"]
    end
    Website --> External_Comm -- "'Links to Channels'"
    External_Comm --> CM_Communicate -- "'Community Communication'"
Loading

5. Data Storage and Persistence

The Knative Community Platform primarily relies on GitHub for data storage and persistence.

  • GitHub Repository (knative/community):

    • Storage: Stores all content, configuration, and history within Git repositories. GitHub provides robust and reliable storage infrastructure.
    • Persistence: Data is persistently stored by GitHub and backed up according to GitHub's data durability policies. Version history is maintained indefinitely, providing a complete audit trail.
    • Data Types: Markdown files, static assets (images, etc.), issue and pull request data, discussion threads, workflow configurations, and repository settings.

  • Community Website (Static Site):

    • Storage: The generated static website files (HTML, CSS, JavaScript) are stored on the chosen web server infrastructure (e.g., Netlify, Vercel, Kubernetes Persistent Volumes).
    • Persistence: Persistence depends on the hosting provider. Services like Netlify and Vercel offer highly durable and redundant storage for static website assets. Kubernetes deployments can utilize Persistent Volumes for persistent storage.
    • Data Types: Static HTML, CSS, JavaScript files, and potentially cached assets served by the web server or CDN.

  • External Communication Channels (Slack, Mailing Lists):

    • Storage: Data within external communication channels is stored and persisted by the respective platform providers (Slack, Google Groups, etc.).
    • Persistence: Persistence is governed by the terms of service and data retention policies of these external providers.
    • Data Types: Chat messages, mailing list emails, forum posts, and associated user data within each platform.

6. Security Considerations (Enhanced)

This section expands on the security considerations for the Knative Community Platform, providing more specific examples and mitigations.

6.1. GitHub Repository Security (Detailed)

  • 6.1.1. Access Control & Permissions Mismanagement:

    • Risk: Granting overly permissive access to the repository (e.g., write access to untrusted individuals) or misconfiguring branch protection rules could allow unauthorized modifications or deletions of critical content.
    • Example Threat: A compromised account with write access could delete important documentation or inject malicious links into the website content.
    • Mitigation:
      • Principle of Least Privilege: Grant repository permissions strictly based on roles and responsibilities. Limit write access to a small, trusted group of maintainers.
      • Branch Protection Rules: Implement strict branch protection rules for the main branch (e.g., main or master), requiring code reviews and status checks for all pull requests before merging.
      • Regular Access Audits: Periodically review and audit repository access permissions to ensure they are still appropriate and remove unnecessary access.
      • MFA Enforcement: Mandate multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all maintainers and contributors with write access to the repository.

  • 6.1.2. Account Compromise & Credential Stuffing:

    • Risk: Maintainer accounts could be compromised through phishing, malware, or credential stuffing attacks, allowing attackers to gain control of the repository.
    • Example Threat: An attacker gaining access to a maintainer account could push malicious code, deface the website, or leak sensitive community information (if inadvertently stored in the repository).
    • Mitigation:
      • Strong Password Policies: Enforce strong password policies for all GitHub accounts associated with the Knative community.
      • MFA Enforcement (Again): MFA significantly reduces the risk of account compromise even if passwords are leaked.
      • Phishing Awareness Training: Educate maintainers and contributors about phishing and social engineering tactics to prevent account compromise.
      • Account Activity Monitoring: Regularly monitor account activity logs for suspicious logins or actions.

  • 6.1.3. Malicious Pull Requests & Supply Chain Attacks:

    • Risk: Attackers could submit pull requests containing malicious code (e.g., JavaScript for XSS), website defacements, or subtly misleading information designed to harm the community or its users. Supply chain attacks could target dependencies used in website generation.
    • Example Threat: A malicious PR could inject JavaScript code into the website that steals user credentials or redirects users to phishing sites. A compromised dependency could introduce vulnerabilities into the generated website.
    • Mitigation:
      • Rigorous Code & Content Review: Implement a mandatory and thorough review process for all pull requests by multiple maintainers with security awareness.
      • Automated Security Checks (GitHub Actions): Utilize automated tools in GitHub Actions to scan pull requests for:
        • Static Analysis Security Testing (SAST): Scan for potential code vulnerabilities (if any dynamic code is introduced).
        • Dependency Vulnerability Scanning: Check for known vulnerabilities in website generator dependencies (e.g., Hugo themes, npm packages).
        • Content Security Policy (CSP) Validation: Ensure CSP headers are correctly configured and effective.
      • Input Sanitization & Output Encoding: If any dynamic content is ever introduced, implement proper input sanitization and output encoding to prevent XSS vulnerabilities.
      • Dependency Pinning & Management: Pin dependency versions in build configurations to ensure consistent and predictable builds. Regularly audit and update dependencies, prioritizing security patches.

6.2. Community Website Security (Detailed)

  • 6.2.1. Static Website Vulnerabilities & Misconfigurations:

    • Risk: Even static websites can be vulnerable due to:
      • Vulnerabilities in Static Site Generator (Hugo): Exploits in the Hugo software itself.
      • Web Server Misconfiguration: Incorrectly configured web server settings (e.g., insecure headers, directory listing enabled).
      • Content Security Policy (CSP) Bypasses: Weak or improperly configured CSP headers that can be bypassed by attackers.
    • Example Threat: A vulnerability in Hugo could be exploited to inject malicious content during website generation. A misconfigured web server could expose sensitive files or allow directory traversal. A weak CSP could fail to prevent XSS attacks.
    • Mitigation:
      • Keep Hugo Up-to-Date: Regularly update the static site generator (Hugo) to the latest version to patch known security vulnerabilities.
      • Secure Web Server Configuration: Follow security best practices for web server configuration, including:
        • Disable Directory Listing: Prevent attackers from browsing website directories.
        • Implement Secure Headers: Configure security-related HTTP headers like Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
        • Regular Security Audits: Periodically audit web server configurations for security weaknesses.
      • Strong Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a strict and well-defined CSP to mitigate XSS risks by controlling the sources from which the website can load resources. Regularly review and refine the CSP.
      • Vulnerability Scanning: Regularly scan the deployed website using automated vulnerability scanners to identify potential weaknesses in the website itself and the web server configuration.

  • 6.2.2. Website Defacement & Data Integrity Attacks:

    • Risk: Attackers could deface the website to spread misinformation, damage the community's reputation, or disrupt access to resources. Data integrity could be compromised by altering website content.
    • Example Threat: An attacker gaining unauthorized access to the GitHub repository or the web server could replace the website's homepage with propaganda or malicious content.
    • Mitigation:
      • Secure GitHub Repository (Primary Mitigation): Securing the GitHub repository (as the source of website content) is the most critical mitigation against defacement.
      • Immutable Infrastructure & Version Control: Deploy the website using immutable infrastructure principles and leverage Git version control for easy rollback to previous versions in case of defacement.
      • Website Monitoring & Integrity Checks: Implement website monitoring and integrity checks to detect unauthorized modifications or defacement attempts. Set up alerts for any detected changes.
      • Regular Backups: Maintain regular backups of the website content and configuration to facilitate rapid restoration in case of a security incident.

  • 6.2.3. Denial of Service (DoS) & Availability Attacks:

    • Risk: Attackers could attempt to overwhelm the web server with traffic, making the website unavailable to legitimate users.
    • Example Threat: A DDoS attack could render the community website inaccessible, disrupting communication and access to resources.
    • Mitigation:
      • Robust Hosting Provider with DDoS Protection: Choose a hosting provider (e.g., Netlify, Vercel, cloud providers) that offers built-in DDoS protection and mitigation capabilities.
      • Content Delivery Network (CDN): Utilize a CDN to distribute website content across multiple servers globally. CDNs can absorb traffic spikes and improve website performance and availability.
      • Caching Mechanisms: Implement effective caching mechanisms (browser caching, CDN caching, server-side caching) to reduce server load and improve website responsiveness under high traffic.
      • Rate Limiting (If Applicable): If the web server or CDN provides rate limiting capabilities, configure them to protect against abusive traffic patterns.

6.3. External Communication Channels Security (Detailed)

  • 6.3.1. Account Compromise & Social Engineering in Communication Channels:

    • Risk: Community members' accounts on external platforms (Slack, mailing lists) could be compromised, leading to impersonation, spam, phishing attacks targeting other community members, or malicious activity within community channels.
    • Example Threat: An attacker could compromise a Slack account and use it to send phishing messages to other community members, attempting to steal credentials or distribute malware.
    • Mitigation:
      • Platform Security Measures: Rely on the security measures provided by the external communication platform providers (Slack, Google Groups, etc.), such as account security features, spam filtering, and moderation tools.
      • Community Education & Awareness: Educate community members about phishing, social engineering, and account security best practices within these communication channels. Encourage strong passwords and MFA where available.
      • Moderation & Reporting Mechanisms: Establish clear community guidelines and moderation policies for external communication channels. Implement mechanisms for reporting suspicious activity or abuse.
      • Limited Sharing of Sensitive Information: Discourage the sharing of sensitive or confidential information in public communication channels.

  • 6.3.2. Data Breaches & Privacy Risks (External Platforms):

    • Risk: Data breaches or security incidents at external communication platform providers (Slack, Google Groups) could potentially expose community communication data and user information. Privacy risks are inherent in using third-party platforms.
    • Example Threat: A data breach at Slack could expose chat logs and user profiles of Knative community members.
    • Mitigation:
      • Platform Provider Security Assessments: Consider the security posture and reputation of external communication platform providers when selecting them.
      • Data Minimization: Avoid sharing highly sensitive or personally identifiable information within these external channels if possible.
      • Awareness of Platform Privacy Policies: Be aware of the privacy policies and data handling practices of the chosen external communication platforms.
      • Alternative Communication Options (If Necessary): If privacy is a paramount concern, consider exploring alternative communication platforms with stronger privacy features or self-hosted solutions (though these may have higher maintenance overhead).

7. Threat Modeling (Actionable Steps)

Building upon this design document and security considerations, a comprehensive threat model for the Knative Community Platform should be conducted. Here are actionable steps:

  1. Asset Identification:

    • High-Value Assets:
      • Community Website Content: The information and resources provided on the website are crucial for community engagement and project adoption.
      • Community Reputation: The Knative community's reputation for being welcoming, helpful, and secure is a valuable asset.
      • Maintainer Accounts (GitHub): Accounts with write access to the knative/community repository are critical for content management and platform maintenance.
      • Contributor Trust: Maintaining the trust of contributors is essential for ongoing community participation.
    • Lower-Value Assets:
      • Publicly available issue tracker data.
      • Public discussion forum content.
      • Links to external communication channels.

  2. Threat Identification (STRIDE Analysis - Examples):

    • Spoofing:
      • Threat: An attacker spoofs a maintainer's identity to push malicious changes to the repository.
      • Asset Affected: Community Website Content, Community Reputation.
    • Tampering:
      • Threat: An attacker tampers with website content to deface the site or spread misinformation.
      • Asset Affected: Community Website Content, Community Reputation.
      • Threat: An attacker modifies website generator dependencies to inject vulnerabilities.
      • Asset Affected: Community Website Content, Community Reputation, Contributor Trust.
    • Repudiation: (Less relevant for this platform, as actions are generally logged by GitHub)
    • Information Disclosure:
      • Threat: Web server misconfiguration exposes sensitive files or directory listings.
      • Asset Affected: Potentially sensitive configuration files (if any are inadvertently exposed).
    • Denial of Service:
      • Threat: A DDoS attack makes the community website unavailable.
      • Asset Affected: Community Website Content, Community Reputation, Contributor Trust.
    • Elevation of Privilege: (Less relevant for this platform in a traditional sense)
      • Threat: An attacker gains unauthorized write access to the GitHub repository by exploiting a vulnerability in GitHub's access control system (highly unlikely but theoretically possible).
      • Asset Affected: All assets.

  3. Vulnerability Analysis (Based on Design & Security Considerations):

    • Vulnerabilities:
      • Weak access control policies in the GitHub repository.
      • Lack of MFA enforcement for maintainer accounts.
      • Insufficient code/content review processes for pull requests.
      • Outdated dependencies in the website generation process.
      • Web server misconfigurations.
      • Weak or missing Content Security Policy.
      • Lack of website monitoring and integrity checks.

  4. Risk Assessment (Likelihood x Impact):

    • Example Risk: "Malicious Pull Request leading to Website Defacement"
      • Likelihood: Medium (requires social engineering or compromised account, but possible).
      • Impact: High (damages community reputation, disrupts access to resources).
      • Risk Level: Medium-High.

  5. Mitigation Strategies (Prioritized based on Risk Assessment):

    • High Priority Mitigations:
      • Enforce MFA for all maintainers with write access.
      • Implement strict branch protection rules on the main branch.
      • Establish a mandatory and thorough pull request review process.
      • Implement automated security checks in GitHub Actions (dependency scanning, basic SAST).
      • Secure web server configuration and implement a strong CSP.
      • Set up website monitoring and integrity checks.
    • Medium Priority Mitigations:
      • Regularly audit repository access permissions.
      • Provide phishing awareness training to maintainers and contributors.
      • Keep website generator dependencies up-to-date.
      • Implement DDoS protection and CDN for the website.
    • Low Priority Mitigations:
      • (Continue to monitor and improve security posture over time).

  6. Security Testing & Validation:

    • Action: Conduct vulnerability scanning of the website and web server.
    • Action: Perform penetration testing (ethical hacking) to simulate real-world attacks and identify vulnerabilities.
    • Action: Regularly review and test the effectiveness of implemented mitigations.

  7. Continuous Monitoring & Improvement:

    • Action: Establish a process for ongoing security monitoring of the platform and its components.
    • Action: Implement a vulnerability management process to track and remediate identified vulnerabilities.
    • Action: Regularly review and update the threat model and security mitigations as the platform evolves and new threats emerge.

By following these steps, the Knative community can proactively manage security risks and maintain a secure and trustworthy platform for collaboration and growth. This improved design document provides a solid foundation for these critical threat modeling activities.