Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
59 lines (47 loc) · 6.69 KB

File metadata and controls

59 lines (47 loc) · 6.69 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for knative/community

Objective: Gain Unauthorized Access/Control over Knative Deployments/Resources

Attack Tree Visualization

Goal: Gain Unauthorized Access/Control over Knative Deployments/Resources
├── 1. Exploit Vulnerabilities in Community-Contributed Documentation/Examples [HIGH-RISK]
│   ├── 1.1  Insecure Configuration Examples {CRITICAL}
│   │   ├── 1.1.1  Weak Authentication/Authorization Settings (e.g., exposed secrets in examples) [HIGH-RISK]
│   │   │   └── ACTION: Review all documentation and examples for hardcoded credentials, weak default passwords, or insufficient access controls.  Provide clear warnings and best practices.
│   │   ├── 1.1.2  Misconfigured Network Policies (e.g., overly permissive ingress/egress) [HIGH-RISK]
│   │   │   └── ACTION:  Audit example network policies for least privilege.  Include documentation on secure network configuration.
│   │   └── 1.1.4  Outdated or Vulnerable Dependencies in Example Projects [HIGH-RISK] {CRITICAL}
│   │       └── ACTION: Regularly update dependencies in example projects.  Use dependency scanning tools to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.  Clearly state the supported versions of Knative and dependencies.
├── 3. Exploit Vulnerabilities in Community-Managed Infrastructure (if applicable)
│    ├── 3.1 Compromise of CI/CD Pipelines used for community resources {CRITICAL}
│        └── ACTION: Implement strong access controls and monitoring for CI/CD pipelines. Regularly audit pipeline configurations for security vulnerabilities. Use signed artifacts.
└── 4. Social Engineering Attacks Targeting Community Members
    ├── 4.1 Phishing Attacks to Steal Credentials [HIGH-RISK]
        └── ACTION: Educate community members about phishing attacks and how to identify them. Implement multi-factor authentication for all community accounts.
  • Overall Description: This is a high-risk area because community-provided documentation and examples are often used as starting points for real-world deployments. If these resources contain security vulnerabilities, they can be easily exploited by attackers. The focus is on unintentional vulnerabilities introduced through oversight or lack of security awareness.
  • Description: This is a critical node because it's the most direct way for attackers to exploit community resources. Users often copy and paste example configurations without fully understanding the security implications.
    • Sub-Vectors:
      • 1.1.1 Weak Authentication/Authorization Settings [HIGH-RISK]
        • Description: Examples might include hardcoded credentials, weak default passwords, or overly permissive access control settings (e.g., using cluster-admin role unnecessarily).
        • Attack Scenario: An attacker finds an example with a hardcoded secret. They use this secret to access a user's Knative deployment that was based on the example.
        • Mitigation: Rigorous review of examples, avoiding hardcoded credentials, using strong password policies, and enforcing least privilege.
      • 1.1.2 Misconfigured Network Policies [HIGH-RISK]
        • Description: Example network policies might be too permissive, allowing unauthorized access between services or from external sources.
        • Attack Scenario: An attacker exploits an overly permissive ingress policy in an example to gain access to a sensitive service within a user's Knative deployment.
        • Mitigation: Audit example network policies for least privilege, provide clear documentation on secure network configuration, and use network visualization tools.
      • 1.1.4 Outdated or Vulnerable Dependencies [HIGH-RISK] {CRITICAL}
        • Description: Example projects might include outdated dependencies with known vulnerabilities. Users who copy these projects inherit the vulnerabilities.
        • Attack Scenario: An attacker uses a publicly known exploit for a vulnerable dependency included in an example project to gain code execution within a user's Knative deployment.
        • Mitigation: Regularly update dependencies, use dependency scanning tools (e.g., Snyk, Dependabot), and clearly state supported dependency versions.
  • 3.1 Compromise of CI/CD Pipelines used for community resources {CRITICAL}
    • Description: This is a critical node because a compromised CI/CD pipeline could allow attackers to inject malicious code into official Knative releases or community-managed resources (e.g., documentation website, container images). This has a very high impact, as it affects all users.
    • Attack Scenario: An attacker gains access to the CI/CD pipeline and modifies the build process to include a backdoor in a Knative component. This backdoor is then distributed to all users who update their Knative installation.
    • Mitigation: Implement strong access controls (least privilege, MFA), monitor pipeline activity for anomalies, regularly audit pipeline configurations, use signed artifacts, and employ infrastructure-as-code with security reviews.
  • 4.1 Phishing Attacks to Steal Credentials [HIGH-RISK]
    • Description: Phishing attacks are a common and effective way to steal credentials. Attackers could target Knative community members to gain access to accounts with privileges to modify code, documentation, or infrastructure.
    • Attack Scenario: An attacker sends a phishing email impersonating a Knative maintainer, requesting community members to log in to a fake website to update their account information. The attacker then uses the stolen credentials to access the official Knative repository.
    • Mitigation: Educate community members about phishing attacks, implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all community accounts, use email filtering and security tools, and encourage reporting of suspicious emails.