Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
115 lines (97 loc) · 8.52 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

115 lines (97 loc) · 8.52 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for labstack/echo

Objective: Compromise Application Using Echo Framework

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Echo Application **[CRITICAL NODE]**
├── OR
│   ├── Exploit Routing Vulnerabilities **[CRITICAL NODE]** **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
│   │   ├── OR
│   │   │   ├── Route Parameter Injection **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
│   ├── Exploit Middleware Vulnerabilities **[CRITICAL NODE]**
│   │   ├── OR
│   │   │   ├── Vulnerable Default Middleware Configuration (if applicable) **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
│   ├── Exploit Request Handling Vulnerabilities **[CRITICAL NODE]** **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
│   │   ├── OR
│   │   │   ├── Header Injection **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
│   │   │   ├── Parameter Pollution **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
│   ├── Exploit Response Handling Vulnerabilities
│   │   ├── OR
│   │   │   ├── Verbose Error Responses **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
│   ├── Exploit Code-Level Vulnerabilities in Application Logic (Facilitated by Echo) **[CRITICAL NODE]** **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
│   │   ├── OR
│   │   │   ├── Insecure Use of Echo Features **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
│   ├── Exploit Dependency Vulnerabilities (Indirectly related to Echo) **[CRITICAL NODE]** **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
│   │   ├── OR
│   │   │   ├── Vulnerable Echo Dependencies **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
│   │   │   ├── Vulnerable Application Dependencies (Used with Echo) **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**

Attack Tree Path: Compromise Echo Application [CRITICAL NODE]

  • This is the ultimate goal of the attacker. Success here means gaining unauthorized access, control, or causing significant damage to the application.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Routing Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Route Parameter Injection [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Description: Attackers inject malicious payloads into route parameters.
      • Examples: SQL Injection, Command Injection, Path Traversal via manipulated route parameters.
      • Exploitation Steps:
        • Identify routes that use parameters in backend operations (database queries, file system access, etc.).
        • Craft requests with malicious payloads in route parameters (e.g., '/users/{id}' with id as '1; DROP TABLE users;').
        • Application processes the parameter without proper sanitization, leading to unintended code execution or data manipulation.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Middleware Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Vulnerable Default Middleware Configuration (if applicable) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Description: Exploiting insecure default configurations of middleware components.
      • Examples: Overly permissive CORS policies, weak security headers, default credentials in middleware.
      • Exploitation Steps:
        • Identify default middleware used by the application (if any).
        • Check for known insecure default configurations (e.g., CORS allowing * origin).
        • Exploit the misconfiguration (e.g., CORS bypass to perform cross-site requests).

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Request Handling Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Header Injection [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Description: Injecting malicious content into HTTP request headers.
      • Examples: SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery), Open Redirect, HTTP Response Splitting (less common in modern frameworks but theoretically possible).
      • Exploitation Steps:
        • Identify application code that uses request headers (e.g., X-Forwarded-For, Host, Referer) in backend requests, redirects, or logging without sanitization.
        • Craft requests with malicious payloads in headers (e.g., Host: attacker.com for Open Redirect).
        • Application processes the injected header in a vulnerable manner, leading to SSRF, redirect, or other header-based attacks.
    • Parameter Pollution [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Description: Sending requests with duplicate parameters (query string or form data) to cause unexpected behavior.
      • Examples: Logic bypasses, authentication bypasses, data manipulation due to parameter precedence confusion.
      • Exploitation Steps:
        • Analyze application logic to understand how it handles request parameters, especially duplicate parameters.
        • Craft requests with duplicate parameters (e.g., '/api/resource?id=1&id=2').
        • Application misinterprets or mishandles the duplicate parameters, leading to unintended behavior or security flaws.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Response Handling Vulnerabilities

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Verbose Error Responses [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Description: Exploiting overly detailed error messages exposed in responses.
      • Examples: Information leakage (path disclosure, internal configuration details, database schema), aiding reconnaissance for further attacks.
      • Exploitation Steps:
        • Trigger application errors (e.g., invalid input, resource not found).
        • Analyze error responses for sensitive information (file paths, stack traces, configuration details).
        • Use leaked information to plan and execute further attacks.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Code-Level Vulnerabilities in Application Logic (Facilitated by Echo) [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Insecure Use of Echo Features [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Description: Developers misusing Echo framework features in a way that introduces vulnerabilities.
      • Examples: Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) due to insecure template rendering, Path Traversal due to unsafe file serving using Echo's static file handlers.
      • Exploitation Steps:
        • Identify areas where the application uses Echo features like template rendering or static file serving.
        • Test for vulnerabilities by injecting payloads specific to the misused feature (e.g., template injection payloads in template parameters, path traversal payloads in file paths).
        • Exploit the resulting vulnerabilities (e.g., execute arbitrary code via SSTI, access unauthorized files via Path Traversal).

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Dependency Vulnerabilities (Indirectly related to Echo) [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Vulnerable Echo Dependencies [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Description: Exploiting known vulnerabilities in libraries that Echo framework depends on (directly or transitively).
      • Examples: Vulnerabilities in underlying HTTP libraries, JSON parsing libraries, or other dependencies used by Echo.
      • Exploitation Steps:
        • Identify dependencies of the Echo framework and their versions.
        • Check for known vulnerabilities in these dependencies using vulnerability databases or scanners.
        • If vulnerabilities exist and are exploitable in the application's context, craft exploits to leverage them.
    • Vulnerable Application Dependencies (Used with Echo) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Description: Exploiting known vulnerabilities in libraries that the application uses alongside Echo.
      • Examples: Vulnerabilities in database drivers, ORM libraries, utility libraries, or any other dependencies used in the application.
      • Exploitation Steps:
        • Identify application dependencies and their versions.
        • Check for known vulnerabilities in these dependencies.
        • If vulnerabilities exist and are exploitable in the application's context, craft exploits to leverage them.