Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
69 lines (58 loc) · 6.73 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

69 lines (58 loc) · 6.73 KB

Threat Model Analysis for libp2p/go-libp2p

Threat: Peer ID Spoofing

  • Description: An attacker generates a Peer ID and cryptographic keys that are similar or identical to a legitimate peer's. They then attempt to join the network and impersonate the legitimate peer. This could involve key compromise or vulnerabilities in key generation/handling within go-libp2p.
  • Impact: Unauthorized access to resources intended for the spoofed peer, interception of messages, injection of malicious data under a false identity, disruption of service for the legitimate peer.
  • Affected go-libp2p Component: Identity module, Crypto module (key generation, key management), Peerstore.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Use strong and cryptographically secure key generation practices provided by go-libp2p.
    • Securely store private keys using go-libp2p's key management features or external secure storage.
    • Implement application-level authentication and authorization mechanisms beyond just Peer ID verification.
    • Consider using peer reputation systems to detect and isolate suspicious peers.
    • Regularly audit key management processes and code related to go-libp2p.

Threat: Message Interception and Modification (Man-in-the-Middle)

  • Description: An attacker intercepts network traffic between two peers. If go-libp2p's encryption (e.g., Noise, TLS) is weak, improperly configured, or vulnerable, the attacker can decrypt, read, and modify messages in transit before forwarding them.
  • Impact: Loss of data confidentiality, compromised data integrity, potential for data corruption, injection of malicious commands or data.
  • Affected go-libp2p Component: Transport protocols (Noise, TLS) within go-libp2p, Crypto module (encryption/decryption), Stream multiplexing.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Enforce strong encryption for all communication channels using robust cipher suites supported by go-libp2p.
    • Properly configure go-libp2p to utilize encryption and verify encryption is active during connection establishment.
    • Regularly update go-libp2p and its dependencies to patch encryption-related vulnerabilities.
    • Consider end-to-end application-level encryption for sensitive data in addition to go-libp2p transport encryption.
    • Implement mutual authentication (mTLS) where appropriate using go-libp2p features to verify peer identities during connection establishment.

Threat: Protocol Implementation Vulnerabilities

  • Description: go-libp2p or its implemented protocols (transport, stream muxing, discovery) contain bugs or security flaws. Attackers exploit these vulnerabilities by crafting specific network packets or interactions that trigger unexpected behavior, leading to security breaches directly within go-libp2p.
  • Impact: Wide range of impacts depending on the vulnerability: data corruption, information disclosure, denial of service, remote code execution, or bypass of security mechanisms within the go-libp2p framework.
  • Affected go-libp2p Component: Any go-libp2p module (Transport, Stream Muxer, Discovery, DHT, Pubsub, etc.).
  • Risk Severity: Critical to High (depending on the specific vulnerability)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Stay updated with go-libp2p security advisories and patch releases.
    • Regularly update to the latest stable versions of go-libp2p.
    • Monitor for known vulnerabilities in go-libp2p and its dependencies.
    • Conduct static and dynamic code analysis of our application's libp2p interactions.
    • Consider fuzzing go-libp2p integration to proactively find vulnerabilities.
    • Implement input validation and sanitization for data received through libp2p to mitigate potential exploitation of parsing vulnerabilities within go-libp2p protocols.

Threat: Peer Flooding and Connection Exhaustion

  • Description: A malicious peer initiates a large number of connection requests to a target peer, or sends excessive data streams, overwhelming the target's resources (CPU, memory, bandwidth) and causing denial of service. This directly exploits go-libp2p's connection management and stream handling mechanisms.
  • Impact: Application unavailability, performance degradation, service disruption for legitimate peers, resource exhaustion on target nodes, potentially impacting the stability of the go-libp2p node.
  • Affected go-libp2p Component: Connection Manager, Swarm, Stream Muxer, Resource Manager.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement rate limiting on incoming connection requests using go-libp2p's Connection Manager configurations.
    • Configure connection limits and resource usage limits within go-libp2p's Connection Manager and Resource Manager.
    • Implement resource monitoring and alerting to detect and respond to resource exhaustion attacks targeting go-libp2p.
    • Consider using peer reputation systems to identify and block peers exhibiting malicious connection patterns within the go-libp2p network.
    • Implement connection backoff and throttling mechanisms within go-libp2p to prevent resource exhaustion from repeated connection attempts.

Threat: Protocol-Level Denial of Service

  • Description: Attackers exploit vulnerabilities or inefficiencies in go-libp2p protocols themselves to cause denial of service. This involves crafting malicious protocol messages or sequences that consume excessive resources when processed by the target peer's go-libp2p implementation.
  • Impact: Application unavailability, resource exhaustion, service disruption, potential crash of go-libp2p nodes, impacting the entire P2P network functionality.
  • Affected go-libp2p Component: Any go-libp2p protocol implementation (Transport, Stream Muxer, Discovery, Pubsub, etc.).
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Stay updated with go-libp2p security advisories and patch releases.
    • Regularly update to the latest stable versions of go-libp2p.
    • Monitor for unusual protocol behavior and traffic patterns within the go-libp2p network.
    • Implement input validation and sanitization for all protocol messages handled by go-libp2p.
    • Implement timeouts and resource limits for protocol processing within go-libp2p.
    • Consider fuzzing go-libp2p protocol implementations to identify potential DoS vulnerabilities.