Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
102 lines (82 loc) · 7.38 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

102 lines (82 loc) · 7.38 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for lightningnetwork/lnd

Objective: To steal funds from Lightning Network channels managed by the application's lnd node, or to disrupt the application's ability to process Lightning Network payments.

Attack Tree Visualization

                                      +-----------------------------------------------------+
                                      |  Steal Funds or Disrupt LN Payments via lnd Exploit  |
                                      +-----------------------------------------------------+
                                                       |
         +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
         |                                                |
+---------------------+                      +--------------------------+
|  Exploit lnd Bugs  |                      |  Compromise lnd Node     |
+---------------------+                      +--------------------------+
         |                                                |
+--------+--------+                      +--------+--------+--------+
| Protocol-Level |                      |  RPC   |  Wallet |  Config |
| Vulnerabilities|                      |  API   |  Mgmt  |         |
+--------+--------+                      +--------+--------+--------+
         |                                 |        |        |
+--------+--------+                      |        |        |
| HTLC   | Channel |                      |        |        |
| Inter- | Force   |                      |        |        |
| ception| Closure |                      |        |        |
+--------+--------+                      +--------+--------+--------+
         |                                 |        |        |
+-------+-------+                      +-------+-----+ +-----+ +-----+
|       |       |                      |  Unauth. | |  Seed | | Weak | |  Out- |
|       |       |  [HIGH-RISK]         |  Access  | |  Leak | |  Pass | | dated|
|       |       |                      | [CRITICAL]| |[CRITICAL]| |[CRITICAL]| |  Ver. |
|       |       |                      +-------+-----+ +-----+ +-----+
|       |       |
+-------+-------+
|       |       | [HIGH-RISK]
|       |       |
+-------+-------+

Attack Tree Path: 1. Exploit lnd Bugs -> Protocol-Level Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK]

  • Description: This path involves exploiting vulnerabilities within lnd's implementation of the Lightning Network protocol itself. These are often complex and require deep understanding of the protocol.

  • Sub-Vectors:

    • HTLC Interception:

      • Goal: Manipulate or steal funds associated with Hash Time-Locked Contracts (HTLCs) in transit.
      • Methods: Exploiting timing issues, race conditions, or flaws in lnd's HTLC handling logic. Could involve injecting malicious data or delaying/dropping packets.
      • Example: An attacker might try to intercept an HTLC and modify its parameters to redirect the funds to their own address.

    • Channel Force Closure:

      • Goal: Force the closure of a Lightning Channel under conditions that are advantageous to the attacker and disadvantageous to the victim.
      • Methods: Exploiting vulnerabilities in the channel state management or commitment transaction handling within lnd. Could involve triggering a force-closure when the victim has pending HTLCs that would resolve in the attacker's favor.
      • Example: An attacker might repeatedly send invalid updates to a channel, forcing the victim's node to publish an outdated commitment transaction, allowing the attacker to claim funds based on a previous state.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Compromise lnd Node -> RPC API -> Unauthorized Access [HIGH-RISK] [CRITICAL]

  • Description: This is the most direct and often the easiest path to compromise. It involves gaining unauthorized access to the lnd RPC interface.

  • Goal: To execute arbitrary commands on the lnd node, allowing the attacker to control its behavior, steal funds, or disrupt service.

  • Methods:

    • Weak or Default Credentials: Exploiting weak, default, or easily guessable passwords used for RPC authentication.
    • Misconfigured Authentication: Taking advantage of misconfigurations in the RPC authentication settings (e.g., no authentication required, allowing access from untrusted IPs).
    • Vulnerabilities in RPC Implementation: Exploiting bugs in the RPC server code itself (e.g., buffer overflows, injection vulnerabilities) to gain unauthorized access.
    • Brute-Force Attacks: Systematically trying different passwords until the correct one is found.
    • Credential Stuffing: Using credentials obtained from other data breaches to try and gain access.

  • Example: An attacker might use a default or easily guessable password to access the RPC interface and then use the lncli command to unlock the wallet, open channels, send payments, or close channels.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Compromise lnd Node -> Wallet Mgmt -> (Seed Leak OR Weak Password) [HIGH-RISK]

  • Description: This path focuses on compromising the lnd wallet, either by stealing the seed phrase or by cracking the wallet password.

  • Sub-Vectors:

    • Seed Leak [CRITICAL]:

      • Goal: Obtain the seed phrase (mnemonic) for the lnd wallet.
      • Methods:
        • Direct Access to Seed File: Gaining unauthorized access to the file system where the seed phrase is stored (if stored insecurely).
        • Social Engineering: Tricking the user or administrator into revealing the seed phrase.
        • Malware: Using malware to steal the seed phrase from the system.
        • Compromised Backup: Accessing an insecurely stored backup of the seed phrase.
        • Physical Access: Gaining physical access to the device where the seed phrase is stored (e.g., a hardware wallet).
      • Example: An attacker might find the seed phrase written down on a piece of paper or stored in a plain text file on the server.

    • Weak Password [CRITICAL]:

      • Goal: Guess or brute-force the password used to encrypt the lnd wallet.
      • Methods:
        • Dictionary Attacks: Trying a list of common passwords.
        • Brute-Force Attacks: Systematically trying all possible password combinations.
        • Credential Stuffing: Using passwords obtained from other data breaches.
      • Example: An attacker might use a password cracking tool to try a list of common passwords against the encrypted wallet file.

    • Outdated Version [CRITICAL]:

      • Goal: Exploit known vulnerabilities present in older, unpatched versions of lnd.
      • Methods:
        • Leveraging publicly disclosed vulnerabilities with readily available exploit code.
        • Targeting specific weaknesses in older versions that have since been patched.
      • Example: An attacker might use a known exploit for a specific lnd version to gain remote code execution or access sensitive data.