Okay, let's create a design document for the go-micro project, focusing on aspects relevant for threat modeling.
Business Priorities and Goals:
- Provide a simple, yet powerful framework for building microservices.
- Enable developers to focus on business logic rather than infrastructure concerns.
- Offer a pluggable architecture for various technologies (service discovery, message brokers, etc.).
- Promote rapid development and deployment of distributed systems.
- Reduce the complexity of building and managing microservices.
- Support a polyglot environment (though primarily focused on Go).
Most Important Business Risks:
- Compromise of a microservice leading to unauthorized data access or manipulation.
- Denial of service attacks impacting the availability of microservices.
- Interception of communication between microservices.
- Lack of visibility and auditability of inter-service communication.
- Supply chain attacks through compromised dependencies.
- Configuration errors leading to vulnerabilities.
- Inconsistent security policies across different microservices.
Existing Security Controls:
- security control: Pluggable architecture: Allows for the integration of various security-focused plugins (e.g., for authentication, authorization, encryption). Implemented in go-micro architecture.
- security control: Transport Layer Security (TLS): Supported for secure communication between services. Implemented in go-micro transport packages.
- security control: Go language: Go's built-in features (memory safety, strong typing) contribute to reducing certain classes of vulnerabilities. Implemented by using Go language.
- security control: Context: Go's context package is used extensively, which can help with cancellation and deadline propagation, potentially mitigating some denial-of-service scenarios. Implemented in go-micro architecture.
Accepted Risks:
- accepted risk: Default configurations: The framework may have default configurations that are not secure by default, requiring developers to explicitly configure security settings.
- accepted risk: Plugin responsibility: The security of many features depends on the specific plugins used. A poorly implemented or insecure plugin can compromise the entire system.
- accepted risk: Developer awareness: The framework relies on developers to understand and implement security best practices when building their microservices.
Recommended Security Controls:
- security control: Authentication plugin: Implement a default, robust authentication plugin (e.g., using JWT or mTLS).
- security control: Authorization plugin: Implement a default authorization plugin (e.g., using RBAC or ABAC).
- security control: Input validation: Enforce strict input validation in all service handlers and data models.
- security control: Secrets management: Integrate with a secrets management solution (e.g., HashiCorp Vault) to securely store and manage sensitive information.
- security control: Auditing: Implement comprehensive audit logging for all service interactions.
- security control: Rate limiting: Implement rate limiting to protect against denial-of-service attacks.
- security control: Dependency scanning: Regularly scan dependencies for known vulnerabilities.
- security control: Static analysis: Integrate static analysis tools into the build process.
Security Requirements:
- Authentication:
- All services must authenticate with each other.
- Support for multiple authentication mechanisms (e.g., API keys, JWT, mTLS).
- Secure storage and management of authentication credentials.
- Authorization:
- Fine-grained access control for all service endpoints.
- Support for role-based access control (RBAC) or attribute-based access control (ABAC).
- Centralized policy management.
- Input Validation:
- All input data must be validated against a predefined schema.
- Whitelist approach for allowed input values.
- Protection against common injection attacks (e.g., SQL injection, cross-site scripting).
- Cryptography:
- Use of strong, industry-standard cryptographic algorithms.
- Secure key management practices.
- Encryption of data in transit (TLS) and at rest (if applicable).
- Data integrity checks.
graph LR
subgraph "Microservice Ecosystem"
User["User"] --> GoMicroService["Go-Micro Service"]
GoMicroService -- "Service Discovery" --> ServiceDiscovery["Service Discovery (e.g., Consul, etcd)"]
GoMicroService -- "Message Broker" --> MessageBroker["Message Broker (e.g., RabbitMQ, Kafka)"]
GoMicroService -- "Other Services" --> OtherServices["Other Microservices"]
GoMicroService -- "Data Storage" --> Database["Database (e.g., PostgreSQL, MySQL)"]
end
Element Descriptions:
-
Element:
- Name: User
- Type: Person
- Description: Represents a user interacting with the Go-Micro service, either directly or indirectly.
- Responsibilities: Initiates requests to the Go-Micro service.
- Security controls: Authentication and authorization at the service boundary.
-
Element:
- Name: Go-Micro Service
- Type: Software System
- Description: A microservice built using the Go-Micro framework.
- Responsibilities: Handles business logic, interacts with other services and resources.
- Security controls: Authentication, authorization, input validation, encryption, auditing, rate limiting.
-
Element:
- Name: Service Discovery (e.g., Consul, etcd)
- Type: Software System
- Description: A system used for service registration and discovery.
- Responsibilities: Maintains a registry of available services and their locations.
- Security controls: Secure communication with services, access control to the registry.
-
Element:
- Name: Message Broker (e.g., RabbitMQ, Kafka)
- Type: Software System
- Description: A system used for asynchronous communication between services.
- Responsibilities: Handles message queuing, routing, and delivery.
- Security controls: Authentication, authorization, encryption of messages.
-
Element:
- Name: Other Microservices
- Type: Software System
- Description: Other microservices within the ecosystem.
- Responsibilities: Provide specific functionalities.
- Security controls: Same as Go-Micro Service.
-
Element:
- Name: Database (e.g., PostgreSQL, MySQL)
- Type: Software System
- Description: A database used for persistent data storage.
- Responsibilities: Stores and retrieves data.
- Security controls: Authentication, authorization, encryption of data at rest and in transit, auditing.
graph LR
subgraph "Go-Micro Service"
User["User"] --> API["API Gateway/Handler"]
API -- "RPC" --> ServiceLogic["Service Logic"]
ServiceLogic -- "Service Discovery" --> ServiceDiscovery["Service Discovery Client"]
ServiceLogic -- "Message Broker" --> MessageBrokerClient["Message Broker Client"]
ServiceLogic -- "Data Access" --> DataAccess["Data Access Layer"]
DataAccess --> Database["Database Client"]
end
Element Descriptions:
-
Element:
- Name: API Gateway/Handler
- Type: Container
- Description: Handles incoming requests, performs routing, and potentially authentication/authorization.
- Responsibilities: Request routing, authentication, authorization, input validation.
- Security controls: Authentication, authorization, input validation, rate limiting.
-
Element:
- Name: Service Logic
- Type: Container
- Description: Contains the core business logic of the microservice.
- Responsibilities: Implements the service's functionality.
- Security controls: Input validation, business rule enforcement.
-
Element:
- Name: Service Discovery Client
- Type: Container
- Description: Interacts with the service discovery system.
- Responsibilities: Registers the service, discovers other services.
- Security controls: Secure communication with the service discovery system.
-
Element:
- Name: Message Broker Client
- Type: Container
- Description: Interacts with the message broker.
- Responsibilities: Sends and receives messages.
- Security controls: Authentication, authorization, encryption of messages.
-
Element:
- Name: Data Access Layer
- Type: Container
- Description: Handles interactions with the database.
- Responsibilities: Data retrieval, storage, and manipulation.
- Security controls: Input validation, parameterized queries, protection against SQL injection.
-
Element:
- Name: Database Client
- Type: Container
- Description: Connects to and interacts with the database.
- Responsibilities: Executes database queries.
- Security controls: Secure communication with the database.
Possible Deployment Solutions:
- Kubernetes: The most common and recommended approach for deploying microservices.
- Docker Swarm: Another container orchestration platform, less feature-rich than Kubernetes.
- Nomad: A simpler orchestrator from HashiCorp, often used with Consul.
- Virtual Machines: Traditional deployment on VMs, less flexible and scalable.
- Serverless (e.g., AWS Lambda): Possible for some microservices, but may require significant adaptation.
Chosen Solution: Kubernetes
graph LR
subgraph "Kubernetes Cluster"
subgraph "Namespace (e.g., go-micro-app)"
Pod1["Pod (go-micro-service-1)"] -- "Network" --> Pod2["Pod (go-micro-service-2)"]
Pod1 -- "Service Discovery" --> K8sServiceDiscovery["Kubernetes Service Discovery"]
Pod1 -- "Message Broker" --> MessageBroker["Message Broker (e.g., RabbitMQ)"]
Pod2 -- "Message Broker" --> MessageBroker
Pod1 -- "Database" --> Database["Database (e.g., PostgreSQL)"]
Pod2 -- "Database" --> Database
end
Ingress["Ingress Controller"] --> Pod1
Ingress --> Pod2
end
Element Descriptions:
-
Element:
- Name: Pod (go-micro-service-1)
- Type: Deployment Unit
- Description: An instance of a Go-Micro service running in a Kubernetes Pod.
- Responsibilities: Executes the service's code.
- Security controls: Network policies, resource limits, security contexts.
-
Element:
- Name: Pod (go-micro-service-2)
- Type: Deployment Unit
- Description: Another instance of a Go-Micro service (or a different service) running in a Pod.
- Responsibilities: Executes the service's code.
- Security controls: Network policies, resource limits, security contexts.
-
Element:
- Name: Kubernetes Service Discovery
- Type: Infrastructure
- Description: Kubernetes' built-in service discovery mechanism.
- Responsibilities: Provides service discovery within the cluster.
- Security controls: RBAC for access to service information.
-
Element:
- Name: Message Broker (e.g., RabbitMQ)
- Type: Infrastructure
- Description: A message broker deployed within or outside the Kubernetes cluster.
- Responsibilities: Handles asynchronous communication.
- Security controls: Authentication, authorization, encryption.
-
Element:
- Name: Database (e.g., PostgreSQL)
- Type: Infrastructure
- Description: A database deployed within or outside the Kubernetes cluster.
- Responsibilities: Stores and retrieves data.
- Security controls: Authentication, authorization, encryption.
-
Element:
- Name: Ingress Controller
- Type: Infrastructure
- Description: Handles external access to services within the cluster.
- Responsibilities: Routing, TLS termination, load balancing.
- Security controls: TLS, authentication, authorization, web application firewall (WAF).
graph LR
Developer["Developer"] -- "Code Commit" --> GitRepo["Git Repository (GitHub)"]
GitRepo -- "Webhook Trigger" --> CI["CI/CD System (e.g., GitHub Actions)"]
CI -- "Build & Test" --> Build["Build Process"]
Build -- "SAST" --> SAST["SAST Scanner"]
Build -- "Dependency Scan" --> DependencyScanner["Dependency Scanner"]
Build -- "Container Build" --> ContainerBuild["Container Build (Docker)"]
ContainerBuild -- "Push Image" --> ContainerRegistry["Container Registry (e.g., Docker Hub, ECR)"]
Build Process Description:
- Developer commits code to the Git repository (GitHub).
- A webhook triggers the CI/CD system (e.g., GitHub Actions).
- The CI/CD system checks out the code.
- The build process starts:
- Static Application Security Testing (SAST) is performed using a SAST scanner.
- Dependencies are scanned for known vulnerabilities.
- Unit and integration tests are executed.
- The Go code is compiled.
- A Docker container image is built.
- The container image is pushed to a container registry (e.g., Docker Hub, ECR).
Security Controls:
- security control: SAST: Static analysis to identify vulnerabilities in the code.
- security control: Dependency Scanning: Scanning dependencies for known vulnerabilities.
- security control: Code Signing: Signing the built artifacts to ensure integrity.
- security control: Least Privilege: Running build processes with minimal required permissions.
- security control: Build Automation: Automating the build process to ensure consistency and reduce manual errors.
Critical Business Processes:
- Service availability: Ensuring that microservices are available and responsive.
- Data integrity: Maintaining the accuracy and consistency of data.
- Data confidentiality: Protecting sensitive data from unauthorized access.
- User authentication and authorization: Ensuring that only authorized users can access services and data.
Data Sensitivity:
- User data (PII): High sensitivity. Requires strong protection (encryption, access control).
- Financial data: High sensitivity. Requires strong protection (encryption, access control, auditing).
- Service configuration data: Medium sensitivity. Requires protection to prevent unauthorized modification.
- Logs: Low to medium sensitivity, depending on the content. Requires protection to prevent tampering and unauthorized access.
Questions:
- What specific service discovery and message broker implementations are intended to be used?
- What are the specific data storage requirements (database type, data volume, etc.)?
- What are the existing security policies and compliance requirements?
- What is the expected traffic volume and load?
- Are there any specific regulatory requirements (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA)?
- What level of logging and monitoring is required?
- What is the deployment environment (cloud provider, on-premise)?
- Are there any existing authentication and authorization mechanisms in place?
Assumptions:
- BUSINESS POSTURE: The organization has a moderate risk appetite, balancing innovation with security.
- SECURITY POSTURE: Developers have basic security awareness, but may not be security experts.
- DESIGN: The microservices will be primarily written in Go. The system will be deployed on Kubernetes. A service mesh (e.g., Istio) may be considered in the future, but is not currently in scope.