Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
132 lines (101 loc) · 11.4 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

132 lines (101 loc) · 11.4 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for mislav/hub

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Storage of GitHub API Tokens

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Identify where your application configures hub with GitHub API tokens. This might be through environment variables that hub reads, command-line arguments passed to hub, or configuration files used by hub.
    • Step 2: Avoid passing API tokens directly in command-line arguments to hub or hardcoding them in configuration files. These methods can expose tokens in process listings, logs, or configuration repositories.
    • Step 3: Utilize secure environment variables or a dedicated secrets management solution to store API tokens used by hub. Ensure these environment variables are not easily accessible to unauthorized processes or users. For secrets managers, configure hub to retrieve tokens from the secure store.
    • Step 4: Restrict access to the environment where hub is executed and where API tokens are stored. Implement operating system-level permissions to limit access to these sensitive resources.
    • Step 5: Regularly audit the configuration and access controls for API token storage used by hub.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Exposure of API Tokens to Unauthorized Users/Processes - Severity: High
    • Accidental Leakage of API Tokens in Logs or Process Listings - Severity: Medium
    • Compromise of GitHub Account Access via Stolen Tokens - Severity: High

  • Impact:

    • Exposure of API Tokens to Unauthorized Users/Processes: High Risk Reduction
    • Accidental Leakage of API Tokens in Logs or Process Listings: Medium Risk Reduction
    • Compromise of GitHub Account Access via Stolen Tokens: High Risk Reduction

  • Currently Implemented: Partially - Environment variables are used to pass tokens to hub, but they are not encrypted and access control might not be sufficiently strict.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Using a dedicated secrets management solution for hub API tokens.
    • Enforcing stricter OS-level access control to environment variables used by hub.
    • Potentially encrypting environment variables at rest if the environment supports it.

Mitigation Strategy: Principle of Least Privilege for API Tokens used by hub

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Analyze the specific hub commands your application executes. Determine the minimum GitHub API permissions required for these commands to function correctly. Consult GitHub API documentation to understand the scopes needed for each operation.
    • Step 2: Create dedicated GitHub Personal Access Tokens (PATs) or OAuth tokens specifically for your application's use with hub. Avoid reusing personal tokens or tokens with broad, unnecessary permissions.
    • Step 3: Grant only the essential API scopes to these dedicated tokens. For example, if hub is only used for reading public repositories, grant only public_repo scope or no scope at all if unauthenticated access is sufficient. Avoid repo scope unless absolutely necessary for private repository operations.
    • Step 4: Configure hub to use these least-privileged tokens. Ensure your application passes these restricted tokens to hub during execution.
    • Step 5: Regularly review and audit the API token permissions granted to hub. As your application's usage of hub evolves, re-evaluate and adjust token scopes to maintain least privilege.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Over-Privileged Access for hub - Severity: Medium
    • Reduced Impact of Token Compromise - Severity: Medium
    • Accidental or Malicious Actions via hub with Excessive Permissions - Severity: Medium to High (depending on initial permissions)

  • Impact:

    • Over-Privileged Access for hub: Medium Risk Reduction
    • Reduced Impact of Token Compromise: Medium Risk Reduction
    • Accidental or Malicious Actions via hub with Excessive Permissions: Medium to High Risk Reduction

  • Currently Implemented: No - A single, potentially over-privileged API token might be used for all hub operations.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Creation of dedicated, least-privileged API tokens for hub.
    • Configuration of hub to use these restricted tokens.
    • A process for regularly reviewing and adjusting hub's API token permissions.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Rate Limit Handling for hub Interactions

  • Description:

    • Step 1: When using hub programmatically (e.g., parsing its output), monitor for GitHub API rate limit headers in hub's responses. Specifically, look for X-RateLimit-Remaining and X-RateLimit-Reset headers.
    • Step 2: Implement logic to check X-RateLimit-Remaining before executing hub commands that interact with the GitHub API. If the remaining limit is low, implement a delay or backoff strategy.
    • Step 3: If hub encounters a rate limit (indicated by HTTP 429 status code or similar errors in hub's output), implement exponential backoff and retry mechanisms. Pause execution, increase the delay with each retry, and attempt the hub command again after the backoff period.
    • Step 4: Handle rate limit exhaustion gracefully. If retries are unsuccessful after a reasonable number of attempts, log the error and inform the user appropriately, preventing application crashes due to rate limits encountered by hub.
    • Step 5: Optimize your application's usage of hub to minimize API calls. Reduce the frequency of hub commands that interact with the GitHub API where possible.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Application Failures due to GitHub API Rate Limiting via hub - Severity: Medium
    • Degraded Application Performance due to Rate Limiting - Severity: Low to Medium
    • Unreliable hub Operations due to Rate Limits - Severity: Medium

  • Impact:

    • Application Failures due to GitHub API Rate Limiting via hub: High Risk Reduction
    • Degraded Application Performance due to Rate Limiting: High Risk Reduction
    • Unreliable hub Operations due to Rate Limits: High Risk Reduction

  • Currently Implemented: No - The application does not currently handle GitHub API rate limits encountered by hub.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Parsing of rate limit headers from hub's output.
    • Rate limit checking logic before executing API-interacting hub commands.
    • Exponential backoff and retry mechanisms for rate-limited hub operations.
    • Error handling for rate limit exhaustion in the context of hub usage.

Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation and Sanitization for User-Controlled Data in hub Commands

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Identify all points where user input or external data is incorporated into commands executed by hub. This includes repository names, branch names, issue titles, or any other parameters passed to hub commands based on user input.
    • Step 2: Implement strict input validation for all user-provided data before using it in hub commands. Define allowed characters, formats, and lengths for each input field relevant to hub commands. Reject invalid input and provide clear error messages.
    • Step 3: Sanitize user input before constructing hub commands. Use appropriate escaping or quoting mechanisms provided by your programming language or shell to prevent command injection vulnerabilities when passing user input to hub. Ensure proper handling of shell metacharacters.
    • Step 4: If possible, use parameterized command construction methods or libraries that help prevent command injection when working with hub (if such libraries exist for your programming language and hub interaction method). Avoid direct string concatenation of user input into shell commands for hub.
    • Step 5: Regularly review and update input validation and sanitization logic as your application's usage of hub evolves and new commands are used.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Command Injection Vulnerabilities via hub Command Construction - Severity: High
    • Arbitrary Command Execution on the Server through hub - Severity: Critical
    • Unauthorized Actions on GitHub via hub due to Command Injection - Severity: High (depending on hub command and permissions)

  • Impact:

    • Command Injection Vulnerabilities via hub Command Construction: High Risk Reduction
    • Arbitrary Command Execution on the Server through hub: High Risk Reduction
    • Unauthorized Actions on GitHub via hub due to Command Injection: High Risk Reduction

  • Currently Implemented: No - User input used in hub commands is currently not validated or sanitized, creating a command injection risk.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Input validation for all user-provided data used in constructing hub commands.
    • Input sanitization or escaping to prevent command injection when using user input with hub.
    • Review and hardening of command construction logic for hub to eliminate injection vulnerabilities.

Mitigation Strategy: Keep hub Updated to Patch Vulnerabilities

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Establish a process for regularly monitoring for new releases and security updates for hub. Watch the hub GitHub repository (https://github.com/mislav/hub) for announcements and security advisories.
    • Step 2: Include hub version management in your application's deployment and maintenance procedures. Track the version of hub being used and plan for updates.
    • Step 3: Test new versions of hub in a non-production environment before deploying them to production. Verify compatibility with your application and identify any potential issues introduced by the update.
    • Step 4: Implement a streamlined process for updating hub in your production environment. This could involve automated scripts or configuration management tools to ensure timely updates.
    • Step 5: Subscribe to security vulnerability databases and advisories that might cover hub or its dependencies. Proactively identify and address any reported security issues in hub.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Exploitation of Known Security Vulnerabilities in hub itself - Severity: Medium to High (depending on the vulnerability)
    • Compromise of Application or Server due to Vulnerable hub - Severity: Medium to High

  • Impact:

    • Exploitation of Known Security Vulnerabilities in hub: High Risk Reduction
    • Compromise of Application or Server due to Vulnerable hub: High Risk Reduction

  • Currently Implemented: No - hub updates are not performed regularly or systematically. The installed version might be outdated and vulnerable.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • A process for regularly checking for and applying hub updates.
    • Integration of hub version management into application maintenance procedures.
    • Testing of new hub versions before production deployment.
    • A streamlined process for updating hub in production.