Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
29 lines (24 loc) · 3.63 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

29 lines (24 loc) · 3.63 KB

Threat Model Analysis for mislav/hub

Threat: 1. Git Command Execution Threats via hub

  • Threat: Command Injection Vulnerabilities in hub Command Construction.
    • Description: An attacker can inject malicious commands if user-controlled input is directly concatenated into shell commands executed by hub. For example, if the application uses user input to construct a hub pull-request command without sanitization, an attacker could inject shell commands to be executed alongside the intended hub command. This is possible because hub relies on shell execution to run git commands and can be vulnerable if input to hub is not properly handled.
    • Impact: Critical. Full system compromise, arbitrary code execution on the server, data breach, denial of service, and complete loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
    • Affected Hub Component: hub's command execution mechanism, specifically when constructing and executing shell commands based on application input.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Never directly concatenate user input into shell commands when using hub.
      • If possible, avoid constructing shell commands directly and use safer alternatives if available (though hub primarily works by shell command execution).
      • Rigorous input sanitization and validation is absolutely crucial if direct command construction with hub is unavoidable.
      • Employ input validation whitelists to restrict allowed characters and formats in user inputs used with hub.
      • Consider using a wrapper library or function that abstracts away direct command construction with hub and provides safer interfaces.

Threat: 2. Dependency and Supply Chain Threats

  • Threat: Vulnerabilities in hub or its Dependencies.
    • Description: hub itself, or libraries it depends on, might contain security vulnerabilities. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities if the application uses a vulnerable version of hub. This is a supply chain risk, where the vulnerability exists within the hub tool itself or its dependencies, and the application becomes vulnerable by using hub. Exploitation could range from denial of service to remote code execution depending on the specific vulnerability.
    • Impact: Medium to High. The impact depends on the nature and severity of the vulnerability in hub or its dependencies. Could lead to denial of service, information disclosure, or even remote code execution, potentially compromising the application or the system it runs on. In worst case scenarios, this could be Critical if remote code execution is possible.
    • Affected Hub Component: The hub binary and its dependencies as a whole.
    • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on vulnerability severity, potentially Critical for RCE vulnerabilities)
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Regularly update hub to the latest version. This is the most important mitigation.
      • Monitor security advisories and vulnerability databases specifically for hub and its dependencies.
      • Use dependency scanning tools to automatically identify known vulnerabilities in hub and its dependencies within your application's build or deployment pipeline.
      • Consider pinning the version of hub used by the application to ensure consistent behavior, but ensure a process is in place for timely updates when security patches are released.