Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
62 lines (43 loc) · 7.93 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

62 lines (43 loc) · 7.93 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for mislav/hub

Mitigation Strategy: Principle of Least Privilege for PATs

  • Description:

    1. Identify Required Actions: Before creating a PAT for use with hub, list all the specific hub commands that will be used (e.g., hub issue create, hub pr list, hub release create).
    2. Consult hub Documentation: Refer to the hub documentation (and GitHub's API documentation, as hub is a wrapper) to determine the minimum required GitHub API scope for each hub command. hub often maps commands directly to API endpoints.
    3. Create Fine-Grained PAT: When generating the PAT in GitHub's settings, select only the necessary scopes identified in steps 1 and 2. Do not select the broad "repo" scope unless absolutely necessary for a specific hub command (and document why). Use fine-grained PATs.
    4. Document Scope: Clearly document the purpose and scope of each PAT, including the specific hub commands it's intended for, and why those specific scopes were chosen.
    5. Regular Audit: At least quarterly, review all active PATs used with hub. Verify that the scopes are still appropriate for the intended hub commands and revoke any PATs that are no longer needed or overly permissive.
    6. Short-Lived Tokens (if possible): If the workflow allows and you're using hub in scripts, consider generating a new, short-lived PAT for each script execution (or even each hub command, if feasible) and revoking it immediately afterward. This requires more automation but significantly reduces the risk, as the PAT is only valid for the duration of that specific hub operation.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Compromised PAT (used with hub): (Severity: High) - Limits the damage an attacker can do if the PAT is stolen. They can only perform actions within the defined scope, restricting the hub commands they can execute.
    • Accidental Misuse of hub: (Severity: Medium) - Reduces the risk of a developer accidentally performing a destructive action via hub (e.g., hub repo delete) due to an overly permissive PAT.
    • Insider Threat (using hub): (Severity: Medium) - Limits the potential damage a malicious insider could cause with a compromised or misused PAT, restricting the hub commands they can leverage.

  • Impact:

    • Compromised PAT: Risk reduction: High (significantly reduces the blast radius by limiting usable hub commands).
    • Accidental Misuse: Risk reduction: Medium (prevents major accidental damage via hub).
    • Insider Threat: Risk reduction: Medium (limits the scope of potential malicious actions using hub).

  • Currently Implemented: Partially. PATs are used, but a comprehensive review of scopes specifically tied to hub commands and a formal audit process are not yet in place. Implemented for CI/CD pipeline PATs used with hub.

  • Missing Implementation: Needs a formal audit process for all PATs used by developers with hub, focusing on the specific hub commands they execute. Short-lived PATs are not yet implemented for hub usage. Documentation of PAT scopes needs improvement, specifically linking scopes to intended hub commands.

Mitigation Strategy: Keep hub Updated

  • Description:

    1. Regular Updates: Check for updates to the hub CLI tool regularly (e.g., weekly). Use your system's package manager (e.g., brew, apt, choco) or the recommended installation method from the hub repository to update.
    2. Monitor for Security Advisories: Subscribe to the hub repository's releases or security advisories on GitHub to be notified of any vulnerabilities specific to hub.
    3. Automated Updates (CI/CD): In CI/CD pipelines that use hub, ensure that hub is updated automatically as part of the build process. This can be done using a package manager or by explicitly downloading the latest version of hub within the pipeline script.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • hub CLI Vulnerabilities: (Severity: Variable, depends on the vulnerability) - Protects against known vulnerabilities in the hub tool itself. This is crucial as a vulnerability in hub could allow an attacker to bypass intended security controls.

  • Impact:

    • hub CLI Vulnerabilities: Risk reduction: High (for known vulnerabilities in hub).

  • Currently Implemented: Developers are encouraged to update hub, but there's no enforced policy. CI/CD pipeline uses a specific version of hub, but it's not automatically updated.

  • Missing Implementation: Automated updates of hub in the CI/CD pipeline are needed. A formal policy and process for ensuring developers are using the latest version of hub are also needed.

Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation (for hub commands)

  • Description:

    1. Identify Input Sources: Determine all points where user-provided data is used to construct hub commands. This might include command-line arguments to scripts that wrap hub, web forms that trigger hub actions, or API requests that result in hub being used.
    2. Implement Strict Validation: For each input source, implement strict validation rules based on the expected data type and format, specifically considering how that input will be used within a hub command. For example, if an input is expected to be a repository name, validate that it conforms to GitHub's repository naming rules and that it doesn't contain characters that could be misinterpreted by the shell when the hub command is executed.
    3. Use Parameterized Queries/Commands (Ideal, but often not directly applicable to hub): While hub itself doesn't offer parameterized commands in the same way a database query does, strive to structure your code in a way that treats user input as data, not as part of the command string. This might involve using helper functions or libraries to construct the hub command safely.
    4. Escape User Input (Crucial for hub): If parameterized commands are not fully achievable (which is common with CLI tools like hub), carefully escape any user input that is included in a hub command string. Use appropriate escaping functions for the shell being used (e.g., shellescape in Python, proper quoting in Bash). Never directly embed user input into a hub command string without proper escaping. This is the most critical step for preventing command injection with hub.
    5. Test Thoroughly: Test the input validation with a variety of valid and invalid inputs, including edge cases and potential attack vectors specifically designed to exploit how hub might handle unusual input.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Command Injection (via hub): (Severity: High) - Prevents attackers from injecting malicious code into hub commands via user-provided input. This is the primary threat this mitigation addresses. An attacker could potentially use hub to perform unauthorized actions on GitHub if they can control the arguments passed to it.

  • Impact:

    • Command Injection (via hub): Risk reduction: High (prevents a critical vulnerability that could give an attacker control over your GitHub interactions through hub).

  • Currently Implemented: Basic input validation is performed on some inputs to scripts that use hub, but it's not comprehensive or consistently applied, and proper escaping is not always used.

  • Missing Implementation: A thorough review of all input sources that feed into hub commands and the implementation of robust validation and especially shell escaping mechanisms are needed. The concept of "parameterized commands" needs to be adapted to the context of building hub command strings safely.