Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
201 lines (180 loc) · 24.5 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

201 lines (180 loc) · 24.5 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for ory/hydra

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Configuration Management (Hydra Specific)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Secure Hydra Configuration Management
  • Description:
    1. Version Control Hydra Configuration: Store hydra.yml and any custom configuration files (e.g., client definitions as code) in a version control system.
    2. Externalize Hydra Secrets: Use environment variables or a dedicated secrets management solution (like HashiCorp Vault or Kubernetes Secrets) to manage sensitive Hydra configuration parameters such as:
      • DATABASE_URL
      • SYSTEM_SECRET
      • OAUTH2_JWT_PRIVATE_SIGNER_KEY
      • OAUTH2_JWT_PUBLIC_SIGNER_KEYS
      • SUBJECT_IDENTIFIERS_PAIRWISE_SALT
      • Client secrets (if managed in configuration files).
    3. Restrict Access to Hydra Configuration: Limit access to the configuration repository and secrets management system to authorized administrators only.
    4. Regularly Audit Hydra Configuration: Periodically review the hydra.yml and client configurations for any misconfigurations or insecure settings. Pay attention to:
      • urls.self.issuer - Ensure it's the correct and secure issuer URL.
      • oauth2.grant_types and oauth2.response_types - Only enable necessary grant and response types.
      • oauth2.enforce_pkce - Ensure PKCE enforcement is enabled for relevant client types.
      • secrets.system - Verify the system secret is strong and securely managed.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Exposure of Hydra Secrets (High Severity): Accidental exposure of SYSTEM_SECRET, database credentials, or signing keys leading to complete compromise of Hydra.
    • Hydra Misconfiguration (Medium Severity): Misconfigured Hydra settings leading to insecure OAuth flows, open redirects, or privilege escalation.
    • Unauthorized Configuration Changes (Medium Severity): Unauthorized modification of Hydra configuration leading to security vulnerabilities or service disruption.
  • Impact:
    • Exposure of Hydra Secrets: High reduction - significantly reduces the risk of exposing critical Hydra secrets.
    • Hydra Misconfiguration: Medium reduction - promotes better configuration management and reduces the likelihood of misconfigurations.
    • Unauthorized Configuration Changes: Medium reduction - makes unauthorized configuration changes more difficult and auditable.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. hydra.yml is version controlled. Some secrets are managed via environment variables.
  • Missing Implementation: Dedicated secrets management solution is not fully implemented for all sensitive Hydra parameters. Regular configuration audits are not formally scheduled.

Mitigation Strategy: Strict Redirect URI Validation (Hydra Specific)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Strict Hydra Redirect URI Validation
  • Description:
    1. Configure Exact Match Redirect URIs in Hydra: When registering OAuth 2.0 clients in Hydra, use exact match validation for redirect URIs whenever possible.
    2. Minimize Wildcard Redirect URIs in Hydra: If wildcard matching is necessary for redirect URIs in Hydra client configurations, carefully consider the security implications and minimize the wildcard pattern to be as restrictive as possible.
    3. Avoid Open Redirects in Hydra: Never configure clients in Hydra to allow open redirects (e.g., allowing any URI as a redirect URI).
    4. Regularly Review Hydra Client Redirect URIs: Periodically review registered client configurations in Hydra to identify and remove any unnecessary or overly permissive redirect URI configurations.
    5. Hydra Input Validation: Ensure Hydra itself performs robust input validation on the redirect_uri parameter during authorization requests to prevent manipulation attempts.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Authorization Code Interception via Redirect URI Manipulation (High Severity): Attackers manipulating redirect URIs to intercept authorization codes and gain unauthorized access.
    • Open Redirect Vulnerability via Hydra (Medium Severity): Abusing Hydra's redirect functionality (if misconfigured) to facilitate phishing attacks or redirect users to malicious sites.
  • Impact:
    • Authorization Code Interception via Redirect URI Manipulation: High reduction - effectively prevents redirection of authorization codes to attacker-controlled URIs by enforcing strict validation.
    • Open Redirect Vulnerability via Hydra: High reduction - eliminates the possibility of using Hydra as an open redirector by enforcing proper redirect URI configuration.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Hydra enforces redirect URI validation, primarily using exact match.
  • Missing Implementation: Regular review process for Hydra client redirect URIs is not formally established. Wildcard redirect URI usage in Hydra clients needs to be reviewed and minimized.

Mitigation Strategy: Enforce PKCE (Proof Key for Code Exchange) in Hydra

  • Mitigation Strategy: Enforce PKCE in Hydra
  • Description:
    1. Enable Hydra PKCE Enforcement: Configure Hydra's oauth2.enforce_pkce setting to true to require PKCE for all public clients.
    2. Configure Hydra Clients for PKCE: Ensure that client applications intended to be public clients are registered in Hydra with token_endpoint_auth_method set to none (or appropriate public client type) and are designed to use PKCE during the authorization code flow.
    3. Hydra PKCE Verification: Verify that Hydra correctly implements and enforces PKCE verification during the authorization code exchange process.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Authorization Code Interception for Public Clients (High Severity): Attackers intercepting authorization codes intended for public clients, especially in scenarios where the redirect URI is not perfectly secure.
  • Impact:
    • Authorization Code Interception for Public Clients: High reduction - makes authorization code interception attacks significantly more difficult and practically infeasible for public clients by enforcing cryptographic binding.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. PKCE enforcement setting in Hydra is enabled, but not fully enforced for all public clients yet.
  • Missing Implementation: Full enforcement of PKCE for all designated public clients in Hydra needs to be implemented and tested. Client registration process in Hydra should clearly define and enforce client types and PKCE requirements.

Mitigation Strategy: State Parameter Usage Validation by Hydra

  • Mitigation Strategy: Hydra State Parameter Validation
  • Description:
    1. Hydra State Parameter Requirement: Ensure that Hydra is configured to expect and require the state parameter in authorization requests. While Hydra doesn't strictly enforce state parameter generation, it's crucial for clients to send it and for Hydra to pass it back.
    2. Client-Side State Parameter Generation and Validation (Client Responsibility): While not directly a Hydra configuration, emphasize to developers that client applications must generate, include, and validate the state parameter as described in general OAuth 2.0 best practices. Hydra's role is to pass it back unchanged.
    3. Hydra Pass-Through of State: Verify that Hydra correctly passes the state parameter back to the client application in the redirect URI without modification.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) Attacks (Medium Severity): Attackers exploiting the lack of state parameter validation to trick users into making unintended authorization requests.
  • Impact:
    • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) Attacks: High reduction - effectively prevents CSRF attacks by ensuring the authorization response is tied to the original authorization request (when clients properly implement state). Hydra's role in passing it back is crucial for this mitigation to work.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Hydra is configured to pass through the state parameter.
  • Missing Implementation: Client-side enforcement and consistent implementation of state parameter generation and validation in all applications using Hydra needs to be ensured through developer guidelines and code reviews.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Hydra Client Registration and Management

  • Mitigation Strategy: Secure Hydra Client Management
  • Description:
    1. Authenticated Hydra Client Registration: Implement an authentication mechanism for accessing Hydra's client registration and management endpoints (e.g., using Hydra Admin API with proper authentication and authorization).
    2. Authorization for Hydra Client Management: Enforce authorization policies to control which users or services can register, modify, or delete OAuth 2.0 clients in Hydra. Use Hydra's Admin API roles or integrate with an external authorization system.
    3. Least Privilege for Hydra Client Admins: Grant only necessary permissions to users or roles responsible for managing Hydra clients.
    4. Audit Hydra Client Management Activities: Enable audit logging for all client registration and management operations performed via the Hydra Admin API.
    5. Hydra Client Secret Rotation Guidance: Provide guidance and potentially tools for clients to securely manage and rotate their client secrets (if applicable) within Hydra.
    6. Regular Hydra Client Review: Periodically review registered clients in Hydra and their configurations, removing or disabling unused, suspicious, or outdated clients.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized Hydra Client Registration (Medium Severity): Attackers registering malicious clients in Hydra to gain unauthorized access or impersonate legitimate applications.
    • Hydra Client Configuration Tampering (Medium Severity): Unauthorized modification of client configurations in Hydra leading to security vulnerabilities or service disruption.
    • Compromised Client Secrets (Medium Severity): If client secrets are not managed securely within Hydra or by clients, they could be vulnerable to compromise.
  • Impact:
    • Unauthorized Hydra Client Registration: High reduction - prevents unauthorized entities from registering clients in Hydra.
    • Hydra Client Configuration Tampering: Medium reduction - limits who can modify client configurations in Hydra and provides audit trails.
    • Compromised Client Secrets: Medium reduction - encourages better secret management practices for clients registered in Hydra.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Hydra Admin API is used for client registration, requiring authentication.
  • Missing Implementation: Authorization policies for Hydra client management are not fully enforced. Audit logging for client management activities in Hydra is not fully enabled. Client secret rotation guidance is not yet provided. Regular client review process is not formally established.

Mitigation Strategy: Consent Management Security within Hydra

  • Mitigation Strategy: Secure Hydra Consent Management
  • Description:
    1. Customize Hydra Consent UI for Clarity: Customize the Hydra consent UI to be clear, user-friendly, and accurately reflect the scopes being requested by client applications.
    2. Hydra Scope Display Accuracy: Ensure that the consent UI displayed by Hydra accurately represents the scopes requested in the authorization request.
    3. Secure Hydra Consent Storage: Verify that Hydra stores user consent decisions securely in its database, protecting against unauthorized access or modification.
    4. Hydra Consent Enforcement: Ensure Hydra strictly enforces user consent decisions during authorization and token issuance, preventing access to resources without proper consent.
    5. Hydra User Consent Revocation Endpoint: Implement and expose Hydra's user consent revocation endpoint to allow users to review and revoke previously granted consent.
    6. Audit Logging of Hydra Consent Events: Enable audit logging within Hydra for consent grants and revocations to track consent-related activities.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Over-Scoping due to Unclear Consent (Low to Medium Severity): Users granting consent to excessive scopes due to a confusing or unclear consent UI presented by Hydra.
    • Consent Bypass in Hydra (High Severity): Vulnerabilities in Hydra's consent management logic allowing clients to bypass user consent and access data without authorization.
    • Data Breach due to Hydra Consent Mismanagement (Medium to High Severity): Improper handling of consent within Hydra leading to unauthorized data access and potential data breaches.
  • Impact:
    • Over-Scoping due to Unclear Consent: Medium reduction - improves user understanding of consent and encourages more informed consent decisions through a clearer UI.
    • Consent Bypass in Hydra: High reduction - ensures consent is properly enforced by Hydra, preventing unauthorized access due to consent bypass vulnerabilities.
    • Data Breach due to Hydra Consent Mismanagement: Medium reduction - improves overall consent handling within Hydra and reduces the risk of consent-related data breaches.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Default Hydra consent UI is used. Consent decisions are stored and enforced by Hydra.
  • Missing Implementation: Customization of Hydra consent UI for improved clarity is needed. User consent revocation endpoint needs to be fully implemented and exposed. Audit logging of consent events in Hydra needs to be enabled.

Mitigation Strategy: Token Security and Handling within Hydra

  • Mitigation Strategy: Hydra Token Security and Handling
  • Description:
    1. Configure Short-Lived Hydra Access Tokens: Configure Hydra's token settings to issue short-lived access tokens to minimize the window of opportunity for token misuse. Adjust token lifetimes in hydra.yml (oauth2.access_token_lifespan).
    2. Implement Hydra Refresh Token Rotation: Enable and configure refresh token rotation in Hydra to minimize the impact of refresh token compromise. (Check Hydra documentation for refresh token rotation configuration).
    3. Hydra Token Revocation Endpoint Implementation: Ensure Hydra's token revocation endpoint (/oauth2/revoke) is properly implemented and accessible to allow clients and users to invalidate tokens when necessary.
    4. JWT Verification by Hydra (if applicable): If using JWT access tokens issued by Hydra, leverage Hydra's built-in JWT signing and verification capabilities and ensure resource servers correctly verify JWTs using Hydra's public keys.
    5. HTTPS Enforcement by Hydra: Ensure Hydra enforces HTTPS for all token-related endpoints (token endpoint, authorization endpoint, revocation endpoint) to prevent token interception in transit.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Access Token Theft and Misuse (High Severity): Attackers stealing access tokens issued by Hydra and using them to gain unauthorized access to protected resources.
    • Refresh Token Theft and Misuse (Medium Severity): Attackers stealing refresh tokens issued by Hydra and using them to obtain new access tokens for extended unauthorized access.
    • Token Replay Attacks (Medium Severity): Attackers replaying stolen tokens issued by Hydra to gain unauthorized access.
  • Impact:
    • Access Token Theft and Misuse: High reduction - short-lived tokens issued by Hydra limit the lifespan of stolen tokens.
    • Refresh Token Theft and Misuse: Medium reduction - refresh token rotation in Hydra limits the lifespan of compromised refresh tokens.
    • Token Replay Attacks: Medium reduction - JWT verification by resource servers (using Hydra's keys) and secure token handling practices reduce the risk of successful replay attacks.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Short-lived access tokens are configured in Hydra. HTTPS is enforced for Hydra endpoints.
  • Missing Implementation: Refresh token rotation in Hydra is not yet implemented. Hydra's token revocation endpoint is not fully utilized by clients. JWT verification by resource servers needs to be consistently implemented.

Mitigation Strategy: Rate Limiting and DoS Prevention in Hydra

  • Mitigation Strategy: Hydra Rate Limiting and DoS Prevention
  • Description:
    1. Identify Critical Hydra Endpoints for Rate Limiting: Identify critical Hydra endpoints that are susceptible to DoS attacks or brute force attempts (e.g., /oauth2/token, /oauth2/auth, /clients - Admin API).
    2. Configure Hydra Rate Limiting Middleware: Utilize Hydra's built-in rate limiting middleware or integrate with external rate limiting solutions to protect these critical endpoints. Configure rate limits in hydra.yml or through custom middleware.
    3. Set Appropriate Hydra Rate Limits: Set rate limits in Hydra based on expected traffic patterns and resource capacity. Start with conservative limits and monitor and adjust as needed.
    4. Hydra Admin API Rate Limiting: Ensure rate limiting is also applied to Hydra's Admin API endpoints to prevent abuse of client management and other administrative functions.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks against Hydra (High Severity): Attackers overwhelming Hydra services with excessive requests, making them unavailable for legitimate authentication and authorization requests.
    • Brute Force Attacks against Hydra Endpoints (Medium Severity): Attackers attempting to brute force client secrets or other credentials by making numerous requests to Hydra's token or authentication endpoints.
  • Impact:
    • Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks against Hydra: High reduction - rate limiting in Hydra effectively mitigates many types of DoS attacks by limiting request rates to critical endpoints.
    • Brute Force Attacks against Hydra Endpoints: Medium reduction - makes brute force attacks against Hydra significantly slower and less likely to succeed by limiting the number of attempts.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Basic rate limiting might be implicitly in place due to infrastructure, but explicit Hydra rate limiting configuration needs review.
  • Missing Implementation: Explicit rate limiting configuration within Hydra needs to be reviewed and enhanced for critical endpoints. Rate limiting for Hydra Admin API needs to be implemented. Monitoring and tuning of Hydra rate limits are not yet established.

Mitigation Strategy: Comprehensive Logging for Hydra

  • Mitigation Strategy: Comprehensive Hydra Logging
  • Description:
    1. Enable Detailed Hydra Logging: Configure Hydra to enable detailed logging by adjusting the logging level in hydra.yml or through environment variables.
    2. Log Security-Relevant Hydra Events: Ensure Hydra logs capture security-relevant events, including:
      • Authentication attempts (successful and failed)
      • Authorization decisions (grants and denials)
      • Token issuance and revocation events
      • Consent grants and revocations
      • Client registration and management activities via Admin API
      • Errors and exceptions within Hydra
    3. Contextual Hydra Logging: Configure Hydra logging to include sufficient context in logs, such as timestamps, user IDs, client IDs, request IDs, and error details.
    4. Secure Hydra Log Storage: Configure Hydra to output logs to a secure and centralized logging system for long-term storage and analysis.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Delayed Incident Detection in Hydra (Medium to High Severity): Lack of sufficient Hydra logging hindering timely detection of security incidents and breaches related to authentication and authorization.
    • Insufficient Forensic Information from Hydra (Medium Severity): Inadequate Hydra logging making it difficult to investigate security incidents and understand their root cause and impact.
    • Compliance Violations related to Hydra Logging (Low to Medium Severity): Insufficient Hydra logging failing to meet regulatory compliance requirements for security auditing.
  • Impact:
    • Delayed Incident Detection in Hydra: High reduction - comprehensive Hydra logging enables faster detection of security incidents related to authentication and authorization.
    • Insufficient Forensic Information from Hydra: High reduction - detailed Hydra logs provide valuable information for incident investigation and response related to Hydra.
    • Compliance Violations related to Hydra Logging: Medium reduction - helps meet logging requirements for various compliance standards related to identity and access management.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Basic logging is enabled for Hydra. Logs might be stored locally or in a basic centralized system.
  • Missing Implementation: Detailed logging configuration for Hydra needs to be reviewed and enhanced to include all security-relevant events. Secure and centralized log storage for Hydra logs needs to be fully implemented. Log rotation and retention policies specifically for Hydra logs need to be implemented.

Mitigation Strategy: Regular Hydra Updates and Vulnerability Management

  • Mitigation Strategy: Regular Hydra Updates and Vulnerability Scanning
  • Description:
    1. Subscribe to Hydra Security Advisories: Subscribe to Ory Hydra security advisories and mailing lists to receive timely notifications about security releases and vulnerabilities.
    2. Monitor Hydra Release Notes for Security Patches: Regularly monitor Hydra release notes for announcements of security patches and updates.
    3. Establish Hydra Update Process: Establish a documented process for promptly applying security patches and updates to the Hydra deployment.
    4. Test Hydra Updates in Staging: Test Hydra updates in a staging environment before deploying them to production to ensure compatibility and stability.
    5. Regular Hydra Vulnerability Scanning: Regularly perform vulnerability scanning specifically targeting the Hydra deployment and its dependencies to identify potential weaknesses.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Exploitation of Known Hydra Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Attackers exploiting publicly known vulnerabilities in outdated versions of Hydra.
    • Exploitation of Unknown Hydra Vulnerabilities (Medium to High Severity): Attackers exploiting zero-day or less known vulnerabilities in Hydra that could be identified through vulnerability scanning.
    • Hydra Dependency Vulnerabilities (Medium Severity): Vulnerabilities in Hydra's dependencies (libraries, frameworks) that could be exploited.
  • Impact:
    • Exploitation of Known Hydra Vulnerabilities: High reduction - regularly updating Hydra eliminates known vulnerabilities and reduces the attack surface significantly.
    • Exploitation of Unknown Hydra Vulnerabilities: Medium reduction - vulnerability scanning helps identify and mitigate potential unknown vulnerabilities in Hydra and its dependencies.
    • Hydra Dependency Vulnerabilities: Medium reduction - scanning and updates address vulnerabilities in Hydra's dependencies, improving overall security posture.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. We are subscribed to Ory Hydra release notes.
  • Missing Implementation: Formal process for applying Hydra security updates is not yet established. Automated update mechanisms are not in place. Testing Hydra updates in staging before production is not consistently followed. Regular vulnerability scanning specifically for Hydra is not yet implemented.