Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
144 lines (119 loc) · 11.7 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

144 lines (119 loc) · 11.7 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for pingcap/tidb

Mitigation Strategy: Transaction Isolation Level Awareness and Configuration

  • Description:

    1. Understand Isolation Levels: Thoroughly understand the different transaction isolation levels supported by TiDB (Read Committed, Repeatable Read, Serializable) and their implications for data consistency and performance. Refer to the official TiDB documentation.
    2. Analyze Application Requirements: Analyze the specific data consistency requirements of your application. Identify transactions that require strong consistency (e.g., financial transactions) and those that can tolerate weaker consistency (e.g., read-only reporting queries).
    3. Choose Appropriate Levels: Select the lowest isolation level that meets the requirements of each transaction. Avoid using Serializable globally unless absolutely necessary, as it can significantly impact performance.
    4. Configure TiDB: Configure the default transaction isolation level in the TiDB configuration file (tidb.toml). Override the default level for specific transactions using the SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SQL statement within the application code.
    5. Document Choices: Clearly document the chosen isolation levels and the rationale behind them. This documentation should be part of the application's design and code documentation.
    6. Testing: Thoroughly test the application with the chosen isolation levels, including concurrent access scenarios, to ensure that data consistency is maintained.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Data Inconsistency due to Incorrect Isolation Level: (Severity: High) - Prevents data corruption or incorrect results caused by using an inappropriate isolation level.
    • Lost Updates: (Severity: High) - Reduces the risk of lost updates in concurrent transactions.
    • Phantom Reads: (Severity: Medium) - Mitigates the risk of reading inconsistent data.
    • Non-Repeatable Reads: (Severity: Medium) - Prevents reading different values for the same data within a transaction.

  • Impact:

    • Data Inconsistency: Risk reduced significantly (e.g., 80%) by choosing the correct isolation level.
    • Lost Updates: Risk reduced significantly (e.g., 70%).
    • Phantom Reads: Risk reduced moderately (e.g., 60%).
    • Non-Repeatable Reads: Risk reduced significantly (e.g., 75%).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • The default isolation level (Repeatable Read) is used globally.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • No analysis of application-specific requirements for different transactions.
    • No explicit configuration of isolation levels for specific transactions.
    • No documentation of isolation level choices.
    • Testing does not specifically focus on isolation level behavior.

Mitigation Strategy: TiDB-Specific SQL Injection Prevention (Using Parameterized Queries and Configuration)

  • Description:

    1. Enforce Parameterized Queries: Mandate the use of parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database interactions from the application code. This is the primary defense against SQL injection.
    2. Code Review and Static Analysis: Implement code reviews and use static analysis tools to automatically detect any instances of string concatenation or dynamic SQL generation that could lead to SQL injection vulnerabilities.
    3. TiDB Configuration: Review and configure TiDB's SQL-related settings in tidb.toml to enhance security. For example:
      • prepared-plan-cache: Enable the prepared plan cache to improve performance and security of parameterized queries.
      • treat-old-grant-as-revoke: Ensure that old grant statements are treated as revoke statements.
    4. Least Privilege (Database Users): Ensure that database users created within TiDB have only the minimum necessary privileges. Avoid granting excessive permissions (e.g., SUPER, GRANT OPTION) that could be abused through SQL injection. Use TiDB's CREATE USER, GRANT, and REVOKE statements to manage user privileges.
    5. TiDB-Specific Testing: Conduct penetration testing that specifically targets TiDB's SQL dialect and features, looking for potential SQL injection vulnerabilities that might be unique to TiDB.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • SQL Injection: (Severity: Critical) - Prevents attackers from injecting malicious SQL code into the application.
    • Data Breach: (Severity: High) - Prevents unauthorized data access through SQL injection.
    • Data Modification/Deletion: (Severity: High) - Prevents unauthorized data manipulation.
    • Privilege Escalation: (Severity: High) - Prevents attackers from gaining higher privileges within the database.

  • Impact:

    • SQL Injection: Risk reduced very significantly (e.g., 95%) with strict enforcement of parameterized queries.
    • Data Breach: Risk reduced very significantly (e.g., 90%).
    • Data Modification/Deletion: Risk reduced very significantly (e.g., 90%).
    • Privilege Escalation: Risk reduced significantly (e.g., 80%).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Parameterized queries are used in some parts of the application, but not consistently.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • No strict enforcement of parameterized queries.
    • No static analysis to detect SQL injection vulnerabilities.
    • TiDB configuration is not optimized for SQL security.
    • Database user privileges are not consistently managed based on the principle of least privilege.
    • No TiDB-specific penetration testing.

Mitigation Strategy: Monitoring TiDB-Specific Metrics and Alerts

  • Description:

    1. Identify Key Metrics: Identify TiDB-specific metrics that are critical for monitoring the health, performance, and security of the cluster. This includes metrics related to:
      • PD: Leader election latency, region count, store count, heartbeat latency.
      • TiKV: Region size, write/read latency, storage capacity, compaction statistics, raft log statistics.
      • TiDB Server: Query latency, QPS, connection count, transaction commit/rollback rates, slow query log.
      • TiFlash (if used): Query latency, data replication lag, resource utilization.
    2. Configure TiDB Monitoring: Use TiDB's built-in monitoring capabilities (e.g., Prometheus integration, Grafana dashboards) to collect and visualize the identified metrics.
    3. Define Alerting Rules: Create specific alerting rules based on thresholds for the key metrics. For example:
      • Alert if PD leader election latency exceeds a certain threshold.
      • Alert if TiKV write latency is consistently high.
      • Alert if the number of slow queries exceeds a certain limit.
      • Alert if TiFlash replication lag is increasing.
    4. Alerting Channels: Configure appropriate alerting channels (e.g., email, Slack, PagerDuty) to notify administrators when alerts are triggered.
    5. Regular Review: Regularly review the monitoring dashboards and alerts to identify any potential issues and tune the alerting rules as needed.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Performance Degradation: (Severity: Medium) - Early detection of performance issues.
    • Cluster Instability: (Severity: High) - Detects issues that could lead to cluster downtime.
    • Data Loss/Corruption (Indirectly): (Severity: High) - Early warning of potential problems that could lead to data loss.
    • Resource Exhaustion: (Severity: Medium) - Detects excessive resource consumption.
    • Security Anomalies (Indirectly): (Severity: Medium) - Unusual patterns in metrics might indicate a security issue.

  • Impact:

    • Performance Degradation: Risk reduced moderately (e.g., 60%).
    • Cluster Instability: Risk reduced significantly (e.g., 70%).
    • Data Loss/Corruption: Risk reduced indirectly (e.g., 40%).
    • Resource Exhaustion: Risk reduced moderately (e.g., 50%).
    • Security Anomalies: Risk reduced indirectly (e.g., 30%).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Basic monitoring of overall system resource utilization.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • No comprehensive monitoring of TiDB-specific metrics.
    • No specific alerting rules for TiDB components.
    • No integration with dedicated alerting channels.

Mitigation Strategy: TiDB Configuration Hardening

  • Description:

    1. Review Configuration Files: Thoroughly review the configuration files for all TiDB components (tidb-server, tikv-server, pd-server).
    2. Disable Unnecessary Features: Disable any features or functionalities that are not required by the application. This reduces the attack surface.
    3. Secure Configuration Options: Configure security-related options appropriately. Examples include:
      • tidb-server:
        • security.ssl-ca, security.ssl-cert, security.ssl-key: Configure TLS encryption for client connections.
        • security.cluster-ssl-ca, security.cluster-ssl-cert, security.cluster-ssl-key: Configure TLS for inter-component communication.
        • skip-grant-table: Ensure this is set to false (the default) to enforce authentication.
      • tikv-server:
        • security.ca-path, security.cert-path, security.key-path: Configure TLS for inter-component communication.
      • pd-server:
        • security.ca-path, security.cert-path, security.key-path: Configure TLS for inter-component communication.
    4. Regular Updates: Keep TiDB components updated to the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches and improvements. Use TiDB's update mechanisms.
    5. Configuration Management: Use configuration management tools (e.g., Ansible, Chef, Puppet) to manage TiDB configurations in a consistent and reproducible manner. This helps prevent configuration drift and ensures that security settings are applied consistently across all nodes.
    6. Configuration Validation: Implement automated checks to validate TiDB configurations against a set of predefined rules and best practices. This can be done using custom scripts or configuration management tools.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Unauthorized Access: (Severity: High) - Prevents unauthorized access due to misconfigured security settings.
    • Data Breach: (Severity: High) - Reduces the risk of data breaches due to insecure configurations.
    • Privilege Escalation: (Severity: High) - Prevents attackers from gaining higher privileges.
    • Configuration Drift: (Severity: Medium) - Ensures consistent and secure configurations across the cluster.

  • Impact:

    • Unauthorized Access: Risk reduced significantly (e.g., 80%).
    • Data Breach: Risk reduced significantly (e.g., 75%).
    • Privilege Escalation: Risk reduced significantly (e.g., 70%).
    • Configuration Drift: Risk reduced significantly (e.g., 85%).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Basic configuration settings are in place, but not comprehensively reviewed or hardened.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • No systematic review of configuration files for security best practices.
    • Not all security-related configuration options are explicitly set.
    • No configuration management tools are used.
    • No automated configuration validation.