Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
36 lines (29 loc) · 4.05 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

36 lines (29 loc) · 4.05 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for schollz/croc

Attack Surface: Default Relay Server Compromise

  • Description: Reliance on the public croc.schollz.com relay server introduces risk if this server is compromised by a malicious actor.
  • Croc Contribution: croc defaults to using this public relay server for connection brokering and potentially data relay if direct peer-to-peer connection fails. This is a core design choice in croc's ease of use.
  • Example: An attacker gains control of croc.schollz.com. Users transferring files unknowingly route their data through the attacker's server, allowing the attacker to intercept and potentially modify files in transit.
  • Impact: Data breach, data manipulation, loss of confidentiality and integrity, denial of service if the relay is taken offline.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Self-Hosted Relay Server: Deploy and use a private, self-hosted croc relay server within your controlled infrastructure. This completely removes dependency on the public server.
    • VPN/Secure Network: Use croc within a trusted and secure network environment (e.g., VPN) to minimize exposure even when relying on the default relay. This adds a layer of network security.

Attack Surface: Croc Application Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Bugs or vulnerabilities within the croc application code itself could be exploited by attackers.
  • Croc Contribution: As with any software, croc's codebase may contain vulnerabilities (e.g., buffer overflows, injection flaws) inherent to software development.
  • Example: A crafted filename or file content sent during a croc transfer triggers a buffer overflow vulnerability in the receiving croc application, allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the receiver's machine.
  • Impact: Remote code execution, denial of service, information disclosure, compromise of user's system.
  • Risk Severity: High (if remote code execution potential exists)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Keep Croc Updated: Regularly update croc to the latest version to benefit from bug fixes and security patches released by the developers. This is crucial for addressing known vulnerabilities.
    • Code Audits (If Modifying Croc): If you are modifying or extending croc, conduct thorough security code audits to identify and fix potential vulnerabilities introduced in your changes. This is important for custom deployments.
    • Sandbox/Isolate Croc (Advanced): Run croc in a sandboxed or isolated environment to limit the impact of potential exploits. This is a more advanced security measure for high-risk environments.

Attack Surface: Dependency Vulnerabilities

  • Description: croc relies on external libraries and dependencies. Vulnerabilities in these dependencies can indirectly affect croc and introduce attack vectors.
  • Croc Contribution: croc's functionality is built upon external libraries for core functionalities like cryptography and networking. The choice to use these dependencies directly introduces this attack surface.
  • Example: A critical vulnerability is discovered in a cryptographic library used by croc. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability through croc to compromise the security of file transfers.
  • Impact: Varies depending on the dependency vulnerability - could range from information disclosure to remote code execution, potentially critical.
  • Risk Severity: High (depending on the severity of the dependency vulnerability and its exploitability through croc)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Dependency Scanning: Regularly scan croc's dependencies for known vulnerabilities using security scanning tools. This is a proactive measure to identify risks.
    • Dependency Updates: Keep croc's dependencies updated to the latest versions that include security patches. This is essential for patching known vulnerabilities.