Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
126 lines (103 loc) · 13.7 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

126 lines (103 loc) · 13.7 KB

Okay, let's dive deep into the security analysis of Croc.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective: The primary objective of this deep analysis is to conduct a thorough security assessment of Croc's key components, identify potential vulnerabilities and weaknesses, and provide actionable mitigation strategies. This includes analyzing the cryptographic protocols, relay server architecture, client-side security, and build/deployment processes. The goal is to ensure Croc meets its stated security goals and to minimize the risk of data breaches, data loss, and other security incidents.

Scope: This analysis covers the following aspects of Croc:

  • Core Functionality: File transfer mechanism, encryption/decryption process, code phrase handling, and relay server interaction.
  • Relay Server: Security of the default relay server and considerations for self-hosted relays.
  • Client Application: Security of the Croc client on various operating systems.
  • Build and Deployment: Security of the build process and deployment mechanisms.
  • Dependencies: Analysis of third-party libraries and their potential security implications (though a full dependency audit is beyond the scope of this review).
  • Threat Model: We will focus on threats identified in the security design review, such as MitM attacks, relay compromise, code phrase compromise, and denial-of-service.

Methodology:

  1. Architecture Review: Analyze the provided C4 diagrams and descriptions to understand the system's architecture, components, and data flow.
  2. Code Review (Inferred): Based on the documentation and security design review, we will infer the likely code structure and behavior, focusing on security-critical areas. A full code review is not possible without direct access to the codebase, but we can make educated assumptions.
  3. Threat Modeling: Identify potential threats and attack vectors based on the architecture, identified risks, and common attack patterns.
  4. Vulnerability Analysis: Assess the likelihood and impact of identified threats, considering existing security controls.
  5. Mitigation Recommendations: Propose specific, actionable steps to mitigate identified vulnerabilities and improve Croc's overall security posture.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of each key component, building upon the provided security design review:

  • PAKE (Password-Authenticated Key Exchange - SPAKE2):

    • Implications: This is the cornerstone of Croc's security. SPAKE2 is a strong protocol designed to resist offline dictionary attacks and man-in-the-middle attacks, provided the code phrase is strong and kept secret. The security of the entire system hinges on the correct implementation and use of SPAKE2.
    • Threats:
      • Weak Code Phrase: If users choose short, predictable, or easily guessable code phrases, the security is severely compromised. An attacker could potentially brute-force the code phrase.
      • Implementation Flaws: Bugs in the SPAKE2 implementation (either in Croc's code or in the underlying library) could introduce vulnerabilities.
      • Side-Channel Attacks: While less likely, sophisticated attacks could try to extract information about the key exchange process through timing or other side channels.
    • Mitigation:
      • Enforce Strong Code Phrases: Crucially, Croc should enforce a minimum complexity for code phrases. This should include a minimum length (e.g., at least 12 characters, preferably more) and ideally a mix of character types (uppercase, lowercase, numbers, symbols). Consider using a password strength meter to guide users. Do not allow common words or phrases.
      • Use a Well-Vetted Library: Rely on a reputable, actively maintained cryptographic library for the SPAKE2 implementation. Do not attempt to implement this from scratch.
      • Regular Audits: The cryptographic code should be a primary focus of security audits.
      • Consider Rate Limiting on Incorrect Code Phrase Attempts: This can slow down brute-force attempts, although it won't stop a determined attacker with a weak code phrase.

  • Relay Server:

    • Implications: The relay server is a critical point of trust. While it doesn't have access to the decrypted data, it does handle the encrypted data stream and facilitates the connection. A compromised relay can disrupt service, perform MitM attacks (if TLS isn't properly configured or if certificate pinning isn't used), or collect metadata.
    • Threats:
      • Relay Compromise: An attacker gaining control of the relay server could eavesdrop on connections, inject malicious data, or perform a denial-of-service attack.
      • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM): If the connection between the clients and the relay isn't properly secured, an attacker could intercept the traffic.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): The relay could be overwhelmed with traffic, making it unavailable to legitimate users.
      • Data Retention: Even if the relay doesn't decrypt the data, it might log connection information (IP addresses, timestamps, etc.), which could be sensitive.
    • Mitigation:
      • Certificate Pinning: Implement certificate pinning for the default relay server. This is essential to prevent MitM attacks using forged certificates. The client should verify that the relay's certificate matches a pre-defined fingerprint.
      • Rate Limiting: Implement robust rate limiting to mitigate DoS attacks. This should include limits on connection attempts, data transfer rates, and other relevant metrics.
      • Secure Configuration: The relay server should be configured with strong security settings, including disabling unnecessary services, using strong passwords, and keeping the software up to date.
      • Minimal Logging: Minimize the amount of data logged by the relay server. If logging is necessary, ensure it's done securely and that logs are regularly reviewed and rotated.
      • Intrusion Detection/Prevention: Consider deploying intrusion detection and prevention systems (IDS/IPS) to monitor the relay server for suspicious activity.
      • Self-Hosting Guidance: Provide very clear and detailed instructions for users who want to run their own relay servers. This should include security best practices.

  • Client Application (CLI, Transfer Library, Relay Client):

    • Implications: The client-side code is responsible for handling user input, interacting with the relay server, and performing encryption/decryption. Vulnerabilities here could lead to data breaches, code execution, or other security issues.
    • Threats:
      • Input Validation: Failure to properly sanitize user input (e.g., file paths, code phrases) could lead to vulnerabilities like path traversal or command injection.
      • Buffer Overflows: If the code doesn't handle input buffers correctly, it could be vulnerable to buffer overflows.
      • Code Injection: If an attacker can inject malicious code into the client application, they could gain control of the system.
      • Dependency Vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in third-party libraries used by the client could be exploited.
    • Mitigation:
      • Strict Input Validation: Thoroughly validate and sanitize all user input. This includes file paths, code phrases, and any other data received from the user or the network. Use whitelisting where possible, rather than blacklisting.
      • Safe Memory Management: Use secure coding practices to prevent buffer overflows and other memory-related vulnerabilities. If using Go, leverage its built-in memory safety features.
      • Dependency Management: Regularly update dependencies to patch known vulnerabilities. Use a dependency scanning tool to identify vulnerable libraries.
      • Code Signing: Sign the released binaries to ensure their integrity and authenticity. This helps prevent attackers from distributing modified versions of the client.
      • Least Privilege: Run the client application with the least privileges necessary. Avoid running as root or administrator.

  • Build and Deployment:

    • Implications: A compromised build process could lead to the distribution of malicious binaries.
    • Threats:
      • Compromised Build Server: An attacker gaining control of the build server could inject malicious code into the binaries.
      • Dependency Tampering: An attacker could compromise a dependency and inject malicious code into it.
      • Unsigned Binaries: Users might download and run modified binaries from unofficial sources.
    • Mitigation:
      • Secure Build Environment: Use a secure build environment (like GitHub Actions) with appropriate access controls and security hardening.
      • Dependency Verification: Use checksums or other mechanisms to verify the integrity of dependencies.
      • SBOM Generation: Generate a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) to track dependencies and identify potential vulnerabilities.
      • Code Signing: Sign the released binaries. This is crucial for ensuring that users are running the authentic, unmodified code.
      • SAST/DAST: Integrate Static and Dynamic Application Security Testing tools into the build pipeline.

3. Inferred Architecture, Components, and Data Flow

Based on the provided information, we can infer the following:

  1. User Interaction: The user interacts with the Croc CLI, providing the file to send and the code phrase (or generating one).
  2. PAKE Initiation: The CLI uses the PAKE library to initiate the key exchange with the recipient's Croc instance, using the code phrase as input.
  3. Relay Connection: The Relay Client establishes a connection to the configured relay server (default or custom).
  4. Key Exchange: The PAKE library performs the secure key exchange through the relay server. The relay does not see the derived encryption key.
  5. File Encryption: Once the key exchange is complete, the Transfer Library encrypts the file using the derived key (likely using a symmetric cipher like AES).
  6. Data Transfer: The encrypted file data is sent through the relay server to the recipient.
  7. File Decryption: The recipient's Transfer Library decrypts the file using the shared key.
  8. File Integrity Check (Recommended): The recipient's client should verify the integrity of the decrypted file (e.g., using a hash).

4. Tailored Security Considerations

  • Code Phrase Strength Enforcement: This is paramount. Croc must enforce strong code phrases. A simple length check is insufficient. Consider using a library like zxcvbn to estimate password strength and reject weak phrases.
  • Relay Server Security: The default relay server is a single point of failure and a high-value target. Invest heavily in securing it. Certificate pinning, rate limiting, and intrusion detection are essential.
  • User Education: Clearly communicate the security implications of using the default relay server versus a self-hosted one. Provide clear, concise instructions for self-hosting.
  • File Integrity: Implement file integrity checks (e.g., using SHA-256 hashing) to ensure that files are not corrupted during transfer or tampered with on the relay.
  • Metadata Protection: Consider ways to minimize the amount of metadata exposed during the transfer. For example, could the file name be encrypted as well?

5. Actionable Mitigation Strategies (Prioritized)

Here's a prioritized list of actionable mitigation strategies, building on the recommendations above:

  1. High Priority:

    • Enforce Strong Code Phrases: Implement robust code phrase strength enforcement, using a password strength estimator and rejecting weak phrases.
    • Certificate Pinning: Implement certificate pinning for the default relay server.
    • File Integrity Checks: Implement file integrity checks (e.g., SHA-256 hashing) before encryption and after decryption.
    • Code Signing: Sign all released binaries.
    • SAST Integration: Integrate a Static Application Security Testing tool into the build pipeline.

  2. Medium Priority:

    • Rate Limiting: Implement comprehensive rate limiting on the relay server.
    • Dependency Scanning: Use a dependency scanning tool to identify and address vulnerable libraries.
    • Self-Hosting Documentation: Improve and expand the documentation for self-hosting relay servers, with a strong emphasis on security best practices.
    • DAST Integration: Integrate basic Dynamic Application Security Testing.

  3. Low Priority (But Still Important):

    • Metadata Minimization: Explore ways to further minimize metadata exposure.
    • Intrusion Detection/Prevention: Consider deploying IDS/IPS for the default relay server.
    • U2F/WebAuthn Support (Future): Investigate the feasibility of supporting U2F/WebAuthn for stronger authentication (as a longer-term goal).
    • Formal Security Audit: Conduct a formal, independent security audit of the codebase and infrastructure.

This deep analysis provides a comprehensive overview of Croc's security posture and offers concrete steps to improve it. The most critical areas to address are code phrase strength, relay server security (especially certificate pinning), and file integrity checks. By implementing these recommendations, Croc can significantly enhance its security and protect its users from a wide range of threats.