Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
121 lines (108 loc) · 13.1 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

121 lines (108 loc) · 13.1 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for shopify/sarama

Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Update Sarama

Description:

  1. Monitor Sarama's GitHub repository for new releases and security advisories. Subscribe to release notifications or use RSS feeds.
  2. Periodically check for updates using go list -m -u all in your project directory.
  3. Review release notes and changelogs for each new version to understand bug fixes and security patches relevant to Sarama.
  4. Update the require directive for github.com/shopify/sarama in your go.mod file to the latest stable version.
  5. Run go mod tidy and go mod vendor to update dependencies and ensure consistency.
  6. Thoroughly test your application after updating Sarama to verify compatibility and functionality with the new version.
  7. Consider automating dependency updates using tools like Dependabot or Renovate in your CI/CD pipeline. List of Threats Mitigated:
  • Vulnerable Dependencies (High Severity): Exploitation of known security vulnerabilities present in older versions of Sarama or its dependencies. Impact:
  • Vulnerable Dependencies: High (Significantly reduces the risk of exploitation by patching known flaws within Sarama). Currently Implemented:
  • Partially implemented. Dependency updates are performed manually during major release cycles, documented in release notes and dependency update logs. go.mod and go.sum files are version controlled in Git repository. Missing Implementation:
  • Automated dependency update process integrated into the CI/CD pipeline specifically for Sarama and its dependencies.
  • Regular, scheduled checks for Sarama updates outside of major release cycles.

Mitigation Strategy: Enforce TLS Encryption in Sarama Configuration

Description:

  1. In your Sarama client configuration, set config.Net.TLS.Enable = true. This enables TLS encryption for communication with Kafka brokers.
  2. If your Kafka cluster uses self-signed certificates or requires specific certificate authorities, configure config.Net.TLS.Config with appropriate tls.Config. This may involve loading CA certificates using x509.SystemCertPool() or x509.NewCertPool() and pool.AppendCertsFromPEM().
  3. For client authentication using TLS certificates, configure config.Net.TLS.Config to load client certificates and private keys using tls.LoadX509KeyPair().
  4. Test the connection using the configured Sarama client to Kafka brokers to verify TLS encryption is successfully established. Monitor network traffic initiated by Sarama to confirm encrypted communication. List of Threats Mitigated:
  • Data in Transit Eavesdropping (High Severity): Prevents attackers from intercepting and reading sensitive data exchanged between the application (using Sarama) and Kafka brokers.
  • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks (High Severity): Reduces the risk of attackers intercepting and manipulating communication between the application (using Sarama) and Kafka brokers. Impact:
  • Data in Transit Eavesdropping: High (Eliminates the risk of plaintext data interception by Sarama).
  • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks: Medium (Significantly reduces the risk by providing encryption and potentially mutual authentication via Sarama TLS configuration). Currently Implemented:
  • Implemented in production and staging environments. config.Net.TLS.Enable = true is set in the application's Sarama configuration. TLS certificates are managed by the infrastructure team and loaded into the application at runtime. Missing Implementation:
  • Automated testing specifically for Sarama client to verify TLS encryption is always enabled and correctly configured in all environments.
  • Alerting and monitoring for TLS configuration drift or misconfigurations within Sarama client setup.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Strong Authentication and Authorization (SASL/SCRAM) in Sarama Configuration

Description:

  1. In your Sarama client configuration:
    • Set config.Net.SASL.Enable = true. This enables SASL authentication in Sarama.
    • Set config.Net.SASL.Mechanism to the desired SASL mechanism supported by your Kafka brokers (e.g., sarama.SASLTypeSCRAMSHA512).
    • Set config.Net.SASL.User and config.Net.SASL.Password with the credentials for the dedicated Kafka user. Retrieve these credentials securely from a secrets management system and configure them for Sarama.
  2. Test the application's connection to Kafka using the configured Sarama client to ensure successful authentication using SASL/SCRAM. Monitor Kafka logs for authentication successes and failures originating from Sarama clients. List of Threats Mitigated:
  • Unauthorized Access (High Severity): Prevents unauthorized applications or users from accessing Kafka resources and data through Sarama clients.
  • Data Manipulation (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of unauthorized modification or deletion of data in Kafka topics by restricting access via Sarama client authentication. Impact:
  • Unauthorized Access: High (Significantly reduces the risk by enforcing authentication and access control within Sarama client connections).
  • Data Manipulation: Medium (Reduces the risk by limiting access through Sarama, but authorization needs to be correctly configured on Kafka brokers). Currently Implemented:
  • Implemented in production and staging environments. SASL/SCRAM-SHA-512 is configured for Kafka brokers and Sarama clients. Application uses dedicated Kafka user with credentials retrieved from HashiCorp Vault and configured in Sarama. Missing Implementation:
  • Automated testing to verify SASL/SCRAM authentication is always enabled and correctly configured in Sarama client.
  • Regular audits of Sarama client authentication configuration to ensure it remains consistent with security policies.

Mitigation Strategy: Robust Error Handling for Sarama Operations

Description:

  1. Implement error handling for all Sarama operations (producing, consuming, connecting, metadata retrieval, etc.). Use if err != nil checks after each Sarama API call.
  2. Log errors appropriately for debugging and monitoring purposes, specifically logging Sarama-related errors to understand client-side issues.
  3. Implement retry mechanisms with exponential backoff for transient errors during Kafka operations initiated by Sarama. Configure Sarama's retry settings (Producer.Retry.Max, Producer.Retry.Backoff, Consumer.Retry.Backoff) to manage retry behavior within the client.
  4. Gracefully handle connection errors reported by Sarama and implement reconnection logic if necessary. Sarama handles reconnection internally, but ensure your application logic can handle temporary unavailability signaled by Sarama. List of Threats Mitigated:
  • Information Disclosure (Low Severity): Prevents leakage of internal system details through overly verbose error messages exposed to users due to Sarama errors.
  • Denial of Service (Low Severity): Robust error handling and retry mechanisms in Sarama clients can improve application resilience and prevent cascading failures in case of Kafka issues impacting Sarama. Impact:
  • Information Disclosure: Low (Minimizes the risk of information leakage through Sarama error messages).
  • Denial of Service: Low (Slightly improves resilience of Sarama clients, but primarily addresses operational stability rather than direct DoS attacks). Currently Implemented:
  • Implemented throughout the application. Error handling is present for most Sarama operations. Basic logging of Sarama errors is in place. Retry mechanisms are configured for producers using Sarama settings. Missing Implementation:
  • Standardized error handling patterns across all Sarama interactions to ensure consistent error management.
  • Centralized error logging and monitoring specifically for Sarama-related errors to proactively identify client-side issues.
  • More sophisticated retry strategies within Sarama clients with circuit breaker patterns for handling persistent Kafka issues reported by Sarama.

Mitigation Strategy: Resource Management and Connection Handling for Sarama Clients

Description:

  1. Properly close Sarama clients, producers, and consumers when they are no longer needed using defer client.Close(), defer producer.Close(), and defer consumer.Close() patterns to release resources held by Sarama.
  2. Avoid creating unnecessary Sarama clients, producers, or consumers. Reuse existing instances where possible to minimize resource consumption by Sarama clients.
  3. Monitor application resource usage (connections, memory, CPU, file descriptors) to detect potential resource leaks or exhaustion specifically related to Sarama client usage. Use monitoring tools and dashboards to track Sarama client metrics.
  4. Set appropriate timeouts for Sarama operations (config.Net.DialTimeout, config.Net.ReadTimeout, config.Net.WriteTimeout) to prevent indefinite blocking within Sarama client operations and resource starvation. List of Threats Mitigated:
  • Denial of Service (Medium Severity): Prevents resource exhaustion attacks or unintentional resource leaks in Sarama clients that could lead to application instability or denial of service.
  • Resource Exhaustion (Medium Severity): Mitigates the risk of application crashing or becoming unresponsive due to excessive resource consumption specifically related to Sarama connections and operations. Impact:
  • Denial of Service: Medium (Reduces the risk of resource exhaustion-based DoS related to Sarama, but not direct attack mitigation).
  • Resource Exhaustion: Medium (Significantly reduces the risk of application instability due to resource leaks in Sarama clients). Currently Implemented:
  • Partially implemented. defer Close() is used in many places, but not consistently across all Sarama components. Basic resource monitoring is in place at the infrastructure level, but not specifically for Sarama clients. Missing Implementation:
  • Consistent and enforced resource management practices for all Sarama clients, producers, and consumers.
  • Application-level monitoring of Sarama connection metrics and resource usage to specifically track client-side resource consumption.
  • Automated checks to detect and alert on potential resource leaks or excessive connection counts originating from Sarama clients.

Mitigation Strategy: Rate Limiting and Backoff Strategies in Sarama Producers/Consumers

Description:

  1. Implement rate limiting on message production using Sarama producer settings like Producer.Flush.Frequency and Producer.Flush.Messages to prevent overwhelming the Kafka cluster or downstream consumers from Sarama producers.
  2. Implement backoff strategies for producer retries and consumer rebalances using Sarama settings like Producer.Retry.Max, Producer.Retry.Backoff, Consumer.Retry.Backoff to avoid overwhelming Kafka brokers with repeated requests from Sarama clients during transient errors.
  3. Monitor Kafka cluster and application performance metrics (latency, throughput, error rates) related to Sarama producers and consumers to identify potential overload situations and adjust rate limiting or backoff strategies in Sarama configuration accordingly. List of Threats Mitigated:
  • Denial of Service (Medium Severity): Prevents unintentional or intentional denial of service caused by overwhelming the Kafka cluster or application with excessive requests from Sarama clients.
  • Resource Exhaustion (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of resource exhaustion in Kafka brokers or application components due to excessive load or retry storms initiated by Sarama clients.
  • Throttling/Performance Degradation (Medium Severity): Prevents performance degradation and ensures fair resource allocation by limiting request rates from Sarama clients. Impact:
  • Denial of Service: Medium (Reduces the risk of DoS due to overload from Sarama clients, but not direct attack mitigation).
  • Resource Exhaustion: Medium (Reduces the risk of resource exhaustion due to excessive load from Sarama clients).
  • Throttling/Performance Degradation: Medium (Improves system stability and performance under load from Sarama clients). Currently Implemented:
  • Partially implemented. Basic retry and backoff strategies are configured for producers using Sarama settings. Rate limiting is not explicitly implemented at the application level within Sarama producer configuration, relying on Kafka broker configurations. Missing Implementation:
  • Application-level rate limiting for Sarama producers and consumers using Sarama's configuration options.
  • Dynamic adjustment of rate limiting and backoff strategies in Sarama configuration based on real-time monitoring data of Sarama client performance.