Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
64 lines (55 loc) · 6.41 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

64 lines (55 loc) · 6.41 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for smallstep/certificates

Attack Surface: CA Private Key Compromise

  • Description: Unauthorized access and control of the Certificate Authority's private key.
  • How Certificates Contribute: The CA private key is the root of trust for all certificates issued by the CA. Compromise allows attackers to forge any certificate, undermining the entire PKI.
  • Example: An attacker gains access to the server where the CA private key is stored due to weak access controls. They copy the key and use it to issue a valid certificate for google.com. They can then use this certificate to perform Man-in-the-Middle attacks against users trying to access Google services.
  • Impact: Complete loss of trust in the PKI, ability to impersonate any service or user, widespread security breaches.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Strong Key Generation: Use strong cryptographic algorithms and key sizes for CA key generation.
      • HSM Usage: Store the CA private key in a Hardware Security Module (HSM) for enhanced security.
      • Strict Access Control: Implement robust access control mechanisms to limit access to the CA private key to only authorized personnel and systems.
      • Key Rotation: Regularly rotate the CA private key (though less frequently than other keys) following established security practices.
      • Secure Backup and Recovery: Implement secure backup and recovery procedures for the CA private key, ensuring backups are encrypted and stored securely offline.
      • Monitoring and Auditing: Implement comprehensive logging and monitoring of CA key access and usage.

Attack Surface: Unauthenticated Certificate Requests

  • Description: Certificate issuance process that does not properly verify the identity and authorization of the requester.
  • How Certificates Contribute: Certificates are issued without proper validation, allowing unauthorized entities to obtain valid certificates.
  • Example: An API endpoint for requesting certificates is exposed without any authentication. An attacker can script requests to obtain certificates for arbitrary domains or identities, potentially for phishing or impersonation attacks.
  • Impact: Unauthorized certificate issuance, potential for impersonation, domain hijacking, and phishing attacks.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Strong Authentication: Implement robust authentication mechanisms for certificate requests (e.g., mutual TLS, API keys, OAuth 2.0).
      • Authorization Checks: Enforce strict authorization policies to ensure only authorized entities can request certificates for specific domains or identities.
      • Input Validation: Thoroughly validate all inputs to the certificate request process to prevent injection attacks and ensure data integrity.
      • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting on certificate request endpoints to prevent abuse and Denial of Service.

Attack Surface: Improper Certificate Validation in Applications

  • Description: Applications fail to properly validate certificates presented to them, leading to acceptance of invalid or malicious certificates.
  • How Certificates Contribute: Even if certificates are issued correctly, vulnerabilities arise if applications don't correctly verify their validity and chain of trust.
  • Example: An application is configured to accept any certificate presented to it without verifying the certificate chain or revocation status. An attacker can present a self-signed certificate or a revoked certificate to bypass authentication or perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack.
  • Impact: Man-in-the-Middle attacks, bypass of authentication, data breaches, and compromised communication security.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Strict Certificate Validation: Implement rigorous certificate validation in applications, including:
        • Verifying the certificate chain of trust back to a trusted root CA.
        • Checking certificate revocation status using CRLs or OCSP.
        • Validating certificate expiration dates.
        • Verifying certificate fields like Subject Alternative Names (SANs) and Key Usage.
      • Use Secure Libraries: Utilize well-vetted and secure TLS/SSL libraries that handle certificate validation correctly.
      • Certificate Pinning (Optional): Consider certificate pinning for critical applications to further restrict accepted certificates to a known set.

Attack Surface: Insecure Storage of Private Keys (Client/Service Certificates)

  • Description: Private keys for client or service certificates are stored insecurely, making them vulnerable to unauthorized access.
  • How Certificates Contribute: Client and service certificates rely on the secrecy of their private keys. If these keys are compromised, the corresponding certificates can be misused.
  • Example: A developer stores a service's private key in plaintext on a server's filesystem. An attacker gains access to the server and steals the private key. They can then use this key to impersonate the service and gain unauthorized access to resources.
  • Impact: Impersonation of services or users, unauthorized access to resources, data breaches, and compromised system integrity.
  • Risk Severity: High to Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Encrypted Storage: Encrypt private keys at rest using strong encryption algorithms.
      • Secure Key Management Systems: Utilize secure key management systems or key vaults to store and manage private keys.
      • Least Privilege Access: Implement strict access control policies to limit access to private keys to only authorized processes and users.
      • Avoid Storing Keys in Code: Never hardcode private keys directly into application code.
      • Regular Key Rotation: Rotate client and service certificates and their corresponding private keys regularly.