Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
76 lines (62 loc) · 7.17 KB

File metadata and controls

76 lines (62 loc) · 7.17 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for smallstep/certificates

Objective: Attacker's Goal: To compromise an application that uses smallstep/certificates by exploiting weaknesses or vulnerabilities related to certificate management, leading to unauthorized access or control.

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Application via Certificate Exploitation ├───[AND]─ [HIGH-RISK PATH] Compromise Certificate Infrastructure [CRITICAL NODE] │ ├───[OR]─ [HIGH-RISK PATH] Compromise CA Private Key [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ ├─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] File System Access on CA Server [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ ├─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Weak File Permissions [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ ├─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Insider Threat [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ ├─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Backup/Storage Compromise [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ ├─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Insecure Backups [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ ├─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Exploit Software Vulnerabilities in step-ca [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ ├─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Known Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ ├─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] API Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ │ ├─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Authentication/Authorization Bypass [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ ├─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Social Engineering/Phishing CA Admins [CRITICAL NODE] │ ├───[OR]─ Compromise Issued Certificates │ │ ├─── Certificate Theft │ │ │ ├─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Endpoint Compromise (Server/Client) │ │ │ │ ├─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Malware Infection │ │ │ │ ├─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Weak Access Controls on Certificate Storage [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ └─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Weak Certificate Generation/Storage by Application │ │ │ ├─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Insecure Storage of Certificates/Keys [CRITICAL NODE] │ ├───[OR]─ [HIGH-RISK PATH] Exploit Certificate Validation Weaknesses in Application [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ ├─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Bypass Certificate Validation [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ ├─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Configuration Errors [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ │ ├─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Disabled Certificate Validation [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ │ ├─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Permissive Validation Settings [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ │ ├─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Code Logic Errors [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ ├─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks (Exploiting Validation Gaps) [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ │ ├─── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Lack of Certificate Pinning [CRITICAL NODE] ├───[AND]─ Exploit Compromise for Application Access/Control

  • Attack Vectors:
    • [HIGH-RISK PATH] File System Access on CA Server [CRITICAL NODE]:
      • [HIGH-RISK PATH] Weak File Permissions [CRITICAL NODE]: Attacker exploits incorrectly configured file permissions on the CA server to directly access and steal the CA private key file.
    • [HIGH-RISK PATH] Insider Threat [CRITICAL NODE]: A malicious insider with legitimate access to the CA server abuses their privileges to steal the CA private key.
    • [HIGH-RISK PATH] Backup/Storage Compromise [CRITICAL NODE]:
      • [HIGH-RISK PATH] Insecure Backups [CRITICAL NODE]: Attacker gains access to insecurely stored backups of the CA private key, which are not properly encrypted or access-controlled.
    • [HIGH-RISK PATH] Exploit Software Vulnerabilities in step-ca [CRITICAL NODE]:
      • [HIGH-RISK PATH] Known Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]: Attacker exploits publicly known vulnerabilities in specific versions of the step-ca software to gain unauthorized access and potentially extract the CA private key.
      • [HIGH-RISK PATH] API Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]:
        • [HIGH-RISK PATH] Authentication/Authorization Bypass [CRITICAL NODE]: Attacker bypasses authentication or authorization mechanisms in the step-ca API to access key management functions and potentially retrieve the CA private key.
    • [HIGH-RISK PATH] Social Engineering/Phishing CA Admins [CRITICAL NODE]: Attacker uses social engineering or phishing techniques to trick CA administrators into revealing credentials or performing actions that directly compromise the CA private key.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • [HIGH-RISK PATH] Malware Infection: Malware on a server or client system steals private keys associated with issued certificates.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • Certificates and their private keys are stored on servers or clients with weak file permissions or access controls, allowing unauthorized users or processes to access and steal them.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • [HIGH-RISK PATH] Insecure Storage of Certificates/Keys [CRITICAL NODE]: The application itself stores issued certificates and their private keys insecurely, such as in plaintext in databases, logs, or easily accessible files.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • [HIGH-RISK PATH] Bypass Certificate Validation [CRITICAL NODE]:
      • [HIGH-RISK PATH] Configuration Errors [CRITICAL NODE]:
        • [HIGH-RISK PATH] Disabled Certificate Validation [CRITICAL NODE]: Application is misconfigured to completely disable certificate validation, allowing any certificate (even invalid or rogue ones) to be accepted.
        • [HIGH-RISK PATH] Permissive Validation Settings [CRITICAL NODE]: Application is configured with overly permissive validation settings, such as ignoring certificate errors or not performing proper chain verification.
      • [HIGH-RISK PATH] Code Logic Errors [CRITICAL NODE]: Bugs in the application's code lead to incorrect or bypassed certificate validation logic, allowing invalid or rogue certificates to be accepted.
    • [HIGH-RISK PATH] Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks (Exploiting Validation Gaps) [CRITICAL NODE]:
      • [HIGH-RISK PATH] Lack of Certificate Pinning [CRITICAL NODE]: Application does not implement certificate pinning, making it vulnerable to MitM attacks where an attacker can present a rogue certificate and bypass validation.