Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
37 lines (30 loc) · 3.87 KB

File metadata and controls

37 lines (30 loc) · 3.87 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for spf13/cobra

  • Description: Weaknesses in Cobra's core command parsing logic that could allow attackers to manipulate or bypass intended command structures.
  • Cobra Contribution: Cobra's primary function is command parsing. Vulnerabilities here are inherent to Cobra's design and implementation.
  • Example: An attacker crafts a command like mycli command1 --flag="value" ; malicious_command. If Cobra incorrectly handles special characters in command names or flag values, it might execute the injected malicious_command.
  • Impact: Command injection, unauthorized command execution, potential for arbitrary code execution depending on application privileges and injected commands.
  • Risk Severity: High to Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Keep Cobra Updated: Regularly update Cobra to the latest version to benefit from bug fixes and security patches in command parsing.
    • Security Audits: Conduct security audits and penetration testing specifically focusing on command parsing, especially with complex command structures.
  • Description: Vulnerabilities in how Cobra parses and handles flags (options), potentially allowing injection or manipulation of flag values.
  • Cobra Contribution: Cobra is responsible for flag parsing. Flaws in this process are directly attributable to Cobra.
  • Example: An attacker provides a flag like --file-path="../sensitive/data.txt". If Cobra's parsing doesn't prevent or sanitize path traversal characters, and the application uses this unsanitized path, it leads to a vulnerability.
  • Impact: Path traversal, flag injection leading to unintended application behavior, potential for information disclosure or privilege escalation.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Keep Cobra Updated: Ensure Cobra is up-to-date to patch any flag parsing vulnerabilities.
    • Input Validation and Sanitization (Application Level): Critically, always validate and sanitize flag values after Cobra parsing within the application logic. Specifically for file paths, use secure path handling functions.
    • Flag Whitelisting (Application Level): Define and whitelist expected flags and reject unknown flags to prevent flag injection attacks at the application level.
  • Description: Security weaknesses in custom shell completion functions, which are a feature provided by Cobra.
  • Cobra Contribution: Cobra provides the mechanism for custom completion functions. Insecurely written functions directly leverage Cobra's completion feature to introduce vulnerabilities.
  • Example: A completion function executes an external command based on user input without sanitization. A malicious input during completion could lead to command injection executed during the completion process itself.
  • Impact: Arbitrary code execution on the user's machine during command completion, information disclosure if completion functions access sensitive data insecurely.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Secure Completion Function Design: Design completion functions to be simple and safe. Avoid external command execution or complex logic within them.
    • Input Sanitization in Completion Functions: If external data is used, rigorously sanitize any data used in shell commands or displayed to the user within completion functions.
    • Code Review and Testing: Thoroughly review and test custom completion functions for potential vulnerabilities.