Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
58 lines (49 loc) · 8.2 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

58 lines (49 loc) · 8.2 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for stackexchange/dnscontrol

Attack Surface: Insecure Storage of DNS Provider Credentials

  • Description: Sensitive credentials (API keys, tokens, passwords) required for dnscontrol to interact with DNS providers are stored insecurely, allowing unauthorized access.
  • dnscontrol Contribution: dnscontrol necessitates the use of DNS provider credentials, typically configured within dnscontrol configuration files. The way these files are handled directly dictates the security of these credentials.
  • Example: API keys for AWS Route53 are plainly written in dnsconfig.js and stored on a shared network drive with weak access controls. An attacker gains access to the network drive, reads the file, and obtains the AWS credentials, enabling them to manipulate DNS records and potentially other AWS resources.
  • Impact: Domain hijacking, phishing attacks, denial of service, complete compromise of DNS management for the domain.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Utilize environment variables or dedicated secret management systems (like HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, Google Secret Manager) to manage DNS provider credentials instead of hardcoding them in configuration files.
    • Implement strict access control on systems and storage locations where dnscontrol configuration files or secret management configurations are stored.
    • Avoid committing credentials directly to version control systems. Use .gitignore and regularly scan repositories for accidentally committed secrets.
    • Regularly rotate DNS provider API keys and credentials to limit the window of opportunity if credentials are compromised.
    • Encrypt dnscontrol configuration files at rest if they must be stored locally, although secret management is a more robust solution.

Attack Surface: Configuration File Exposure via Version Control

  • Description: dnscontrol configuration files, which may contain sensitive DNS configurations and indirectly expose infrastructure details, are inadvertently made public or accessible to unauthorized individuals through insecure version control practices.
  • dnscontrol Contribution: dnscontrol configurations are typically managed in version control for collaboration and versioning. If the repository containing these configurations is not properly secured, it becomes a significant attack surface.
  • Example: A private Git repository containing dnsconfig.js with detailed DNS configurations, including internal hostnames and IP addresses used in DNS records, is accidentally made public on GitHub. Attackers discover the repository and gain valuable information about the organization's infrastructure, potentially aiding in further attacks.
  • Impact: Information disclosure of DNS infrastructure, potential credential exposure (if secrets are accidentally included), increased attack surface for targeted attacks based on revealed infrastructure details.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Ensure that version control repositories containing dnscontrol configurations are strictly private and access is limited to authorized personnel only.
    • Implement robust access control mechanisms within the version control system, including branch protection and mandatory code reviews for changes to dnscontrol configurations.
    • Regularly audit repository access permissions and remove unnecessary access.
    • Educate developers on secure version control practices and the risks of exposing dnscontrol configurations.
    • Utilize Git history scanning tools to detect and remove accidentally committed sensitive information from repository history.

Attack Surface: Vulnerabilities in dnscontrol Tool or Dependencies

  • Description: Security vulnerabilities present in the dnscontrol codebase itself or in its third-party dependencies can be exploited to compromise the system running dnscontrol or to manipulate DNS records directly.
  • dnscontrol Contribution: As a software application, dnscontrol is susceptible to software vulnerabilities. Its reliance on external libraries for functionality introduces dependency vulnerabilities that can be exploited.
  • Example: A critical remote code execution vulnerability is discovered in a dependency used by dnscontrol for parsing DNS record data. An attacker crafts a malicious dnscontrol configuration file that, when processed by a vulnerable version of dnscontrol, allows them to execute arbitrary code on the server running dnscontrol, potentially leading to full system compromise and DNS control.
  • Impact: Arbitrary code execution on systems running dnscontrol, unauthorized DNS record manipulation, information disclosure, denial of service, potential privilege escalation.
  • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the nature and exploitability of the vulnerability)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Maintain dnscontrol and all its dependencies at the latest versions, promptly applying security patches as they are released.
    • Implement a vulnerability scanning process for dnscontrol and its dependencies to proactively identify and address known vulnerabilities.
    • Subscribe to security advisories and mailing lists related to dnscontrol and its ecosystem to stay informed about potential vulnerabilities.
    • Run dnscontrol in a secure and isolated environment with minimal privileges to limit the impact of a potential compromise.
    • Consider using static analysis and code review practices for dnscontrol configurations to identify potential issues before deployment.

Attack Surface: Misconfiguration and Logic Errors Leading to Critical DNS Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Incorrect configurations or logical flaws within dnscontrol configurations can result in severe DNS misconfigurations that create critical vulnerabilities, even if not directly exploited through dnscontrol itself.
  • dnscontrol Contribution: dnscontrol's power and flexibility mean that misconfigurations can have significant consequences. The tool faithfully executes the defined configuration, regardless of its correctness or security implications.
  • Example: A developer mistakenly configures a wildcard A record *.example.com pointing to a publicly accessible but insecure staging server. This misconfiguration exposes all subdomains of example.com to potential compromise via the staging server, leading to widespread phishing or malware distribution. Or, an overly permissive SPF record is deployed via dnscontrol, weakening email security for the entire domain and increasing the risk of email spoofing and phishing attacks.
  • Impact: Wide-scale subdomain takeover, significant weakening of domain security posture (e.g., email security), exposure of internal services, potential for large-scale phishing or malware campaigns leveraging the misconfigured DNS.
  • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the severity and scope of the misconfiguration)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement mandatory code review processes for all dnscontrol configuration changes, focusing on DNS security best practices and potential misconfigurations.
    • Thoroughly test dnscontrol configurations in non-production (staging/testing) environments before deploying to production DNS.
    • Utilize linters and validators specifically designed for DNS configurations to automatically detect common errors and security weaknesses in dnscontrol files.
    • Provide comprehensive training to developers and operators on DNS security best practices and secure dnscontrol configuration techniques.
    • Implement monitoring and alerting for unexpected or suspicious DNS changes that might indicate misconfigurations or malicious activity.