Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
79 lines (60 loc) · 6.37 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

79 lines (60 loc) · 6.37 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for tsenart/vegeta

Mitigation Strategy: Strict Rate Limiting and Control within Vegeta

Description:

  1. Conservative -rate: Always start vegeta attack commands with a very low -rate value (e.g., 1/s or lower). Never assume a high rate is safe.
  2. Gradual -rate Increase: Incrementally increase the -rate in small, controlled steps. Monitor the target system after each increase before proceeding. Avoid large jumps.
  3. Controlled -duration: Use the -duration flag to limit the length of attacks. Start with short durations (seconds) and gradually increase them only as needed. Never run attacks indefinitely.
  4. -max-workers and -connections Management: Begin with low values for -max-workers and -connections. Increase these cautiously, observing the impact on both the target and the machine running vegeta. These control concurrency.
  5. Dynamic Adjustment: Be prepared to immediately reduce the -rate, -duration, -max-workers, or -connections if the target system shows signs of stress (high latency, errors, resource exhaustion). Have a plan for quickly stopping or modifying the attack.
  6. Target file usage: Use target files instead of command line arguments to define targets. This allows for easier management and review of the targets.
  7. Stdin usage: Use stdin to pipe targets to vegeta. This allows for dynamic generation of targets and avoids storing targets in files.

Threats Mitigated:

  • DoS/DDoS (caused by vegeta): Severity: High. Uncontrolled vegeta attacks can overwhelm the target.
  • Resource Exhaustion (on target system): Severity: Medium to High. Excessive load can exhaust server resources.
  • Inaccurate Test Results: Severity: Medium. Overloading the system produces misleading data.

Impact:

  • DoS/DDoS: Risk significantly reduced. Controlled parameters prevent overwhelming traffic.
  • Resource Exhaustion: Risk significantly reduced. Gradual increases and monitoring allow for early detection.
  • Inaccurate Test Results: Risk reduced. Controlled testing provides more reliable data.

Currently Implemented:

  • Basic -rate and -duration usage in scripts.

Missing Implementation:

  • Systematic, gradual increase in -rate, -max-workers, and -connections is not consistently followed.
  • A documented plan for dynamically adjusting vegeta parameters during attacks is missing.
  • Target files and stdin usage are not implemented.

Mitigation Strategy: Data Sanitization and Parameterization within Vegeta Scripts

Description:

  1. No Hardcoded Sensitive Data: Never hardcode sensitive data (API keys, tokens, passwords, PII) directly within vegeta attack scripts or in files referenced by -body or -header.
  2. Environment Variables: Use environment variables to store sensitive values. Reference these variables within vegeta scripts using shell variable substitution (e.g., echo "GET https://api.example.com/resource" | vegeta attack -header "Authorization: Bearer $API_TOKEN" ...).
  3. External Files (for non-sensitive data): Use external files (referenced by -body and -header) for request bodies and headers, but ensure these files contain only synthetic or anonymized test data.
  4. Stdin for Dynamic Data: Use stdin (-) as the target source to pipe dynamically generated, sanitized data to vegeta. This avoids storing potentially sensitive data in files. Example: generate_test_data.sh | vegeta attack -targets=- ...
  5. Careful File Handling: If using -body or -header with files, meticulously review the file contents before each run to confirm they contain only test data.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Exposure of Sensitive Data: Severity: High. Accidental leakage of production data during testing.
  • Data Breach (through testing): Severity: High. Compromised testing environment could expose sensitive data.

Impact:

  • Exposure of Sensitive Data: Risk significantly reduced. Parameterization and avoiding hardcoding prevent accidental exposure.
  • Data Breach: Risk reduced. Using environment variables and stdin minimizes the impact of a compromise.

Currently Implemented:

  • Some parameterization of API keys using environment variables.

Missing Implementation:

  • Consistent use of environment variables for all sensitive data.
  • Widespread use of stdin for dynamically generated, sanitized data.
  • A formalized process for reviewing the contents of files used with -body and -header.

Mitigation Strategy: Vegeta Resource Management

Description:

  1. Start Small: Begin with low values for -max-workers and -connections to minimize the initial resource consumption of vegeta itself.
  2. Monitor Vegeta's Host: While vegeta is running, actively monitor the resource usage (CPU, memory, network I/O) of the machine executing vegeta. Use tools like top, htop, or system-specific monitoring utilities.
  3. Adjust Concurrency: If the vegeta host machine shows signs of resource strain (high CPU, memory exhaustion, network saturation), immediately reduce -max-workers and -connections.
  4. Rate and Duration Limits: Indirectly manage vegeta's resource usage by also controlling the -rate and -duration. Lower rates and shorter durations reduce the overall load generated.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Resource Exhaustion (on testing machine): Severity: Medium. The testing machine becoming overloaded leads to inaccurate results.
  • Inaccurate Test Results: Severity: Medium. Bottlenecks on the testing machine skew performance metrics.

Impact:

  • Resource Exhaustion: Risk significantly reduced. Monitoring and adjusting concurrency prevent overload.
  • Inaccurate Test Results: Risk reduced. Ensuring the testing machine is not a bottleneck improves data reliability.

Currently Implemented:

  • Occasional manual checks of resource usage.

Missing Implementation:

  • Systematic monitoring of the vegeta host during every test run.
  • A defined process for adjusting -max-workers, -connections, -rate, and -duration based on observed resource usage.