- Threat: Command Injection Vulnerabilities
- Description:
- Attacker crafts malicious input for command-line arguments or flags.
- Application incorrectly uses
urfave/cli
parsed input to construct and execute external commands via the system shell (e.g., usingos/exec
with shell execution). - Due to lack of proper sanitization of
urfave/cli
input, attacker can inject arbitrary commands into the executed shell command.
- Impact:
- Critical: Full system compromise if the application runs with elevated privileges.
- High: Data breach, data modification, or data deletion.
- High: Denial of Service (DoS).
- CLI Component Affected:
- Application's logic that constructs and executes external commands (developer-implemented), directly using arguments and flags parsed by
urfave/cli
(cli.Args
,cli.Flags
).
- Application's logic that constructs and executes external commands (developer-implemented), directly using arguments and flags parsed by
- Risk Severity: Critical to High (if command execution is involved and input from
urfave/cli
is not properly handled before command construction). - Mitigation Strategies:
- Avoid Shell Execution: Best practice is to use
exec.Command
with separate arguments, directly passing slices of strings, to avoid shell interpretation of metacharacters. This prevents the shell from processing injected commands. - Input Sanitization and Escaping (Avoid if possible): If shell execution is absolutely unavoidable, extremely carefully sanitize and escape user input obtained from
urfave/cli
before incorporating it into shell commands. This is complex and error-prone, so avoiding shell execution is strongly preferred. - Principle of Least Privilege: Run the application with the minimum necessary privileges. Even if command injection occurs, the impact is limited by the application's user privileges.
- Avoid Shell Execution: Best practice is to use
Threat: Path Traversal Vulnerabilities
- Threat: Path Traversal Vulnerabilities
- Description:
- Attacker provides manipulated file paths as command-line arguments or flags parsed by
urfave/cli
(e.g., using../
). - Application uses these paths, obtained directly from
urfave/cli
parsing, to access files without proper validation. - Due to lack of validation of paths provided via
urfave/cli
, attacker can access files outside the intended directory or restricted areas.
- Attacker provides manipulated file paths as command-line arguments or flags parsed by
- Impact:
- High: Unauthorized access to sensitive files.
- High: Information disclosure of potentially critical data.
- Medium to High: Potential for further exploitation if accessed files contain sensitive data or configuration that can be leveraged for other attacks.
- CLI Component Affected:
- Application's logic that handles file paths obtained from
urfave/cli
arguments or flags (developer-implemented), directly usingcli.Args
orcli.Flags
).
- Application's logic that handles file paths obtained from
- Risk Severity: High (if the application handles file paths from
urfave/cli
input and file access controls are insufficient). - Mitigation Strategies:
- Path Validation and Sanitization:
- Canonicalization: Immediately after obtaining file paths from
urfave/cli
, convert them to their canonical form usingfilepath.Clean
(or similar functions in other languages) to resolve symbolic links and remove redundant path separators, mitigating basic traversal attempts. - Restrict Access to Allowed Directories: Implement strict checks to ensure that accessed files are within a predefined allowed directory or a set of allowed directories. Verify paths after obtaining them from
urfave/cli
and before file access, using functions likefilepath.Dir
andstrings.HasPrefix
in Go to confirm paths are within allowed boundaries.
- Canonicalization: Immediately after obtaining file paths from
- Principle of Least Privilege (File System): Run the application with minimal file system permissions. Only grant the application access to the directories and files it absolutely needs to function, limiting the scope of potential path traversal exploitation.
- Path Validation and Sanitization:
Threat: Dependency Vulnerabilities
- Threat: Dependency Vulnerabilities in
urfave/cli
and its dependencies - Description:
urfave/cli
library itself or its dependencies contain known security vulnerabilities.- Application uses a vulnerable version of
urfave/cli
or its dependencies. - Attacker can exploit these vulnerabilities to directly compromise the application through the
urfave/cli
library.
- Impact:
- Critical: Application compromise, potentially leading to remote code execution if a vulnerability in
urfave/cli
allows it. - High: Denial of Service (DoS) if a vulnerability in
urfave/cli
can be triggered by specific input or actions. - High: Information disclosure if a vulnerability in
urfave/cli
allows access to sensitive data.
- Critical: Application compromise, potentially leading to remote code execution if a vulnerability in
- CLI Component Affected:
urfave/cli
library code itself.- Dependencies of
urfave/cli
library.
- Risk Severity: Varies, can be Critical to High (depending on the specific vulnerability in
urfave/cli
or its dependencies). - Mitigation Strategies:
- Dependency Management: Use Go modules or a similar dependency management tool to precisely track and manage dependencies, including
urfave/cli
. - Regularly Update Dependencies: Proactively and regularly update
urfave/cli
and all its dependencies to the latest versions. This is crucial for patching known vulnerabilities. - Vulnerability Scanning: Integrate vulnerability scanning tools into your development and CI/CD pipelines to automatically identify known vulnerabilities in
urfave/cli
and its dependencies. - Monitor Security Advisories: Actively monitor security advisories and vulnerability databases specifically for
urfave/cli
and its Go ecosystem dependencies to stay informed about newly discovered threats and necessary updates.
- Dependency Management: Use Go modules or a similar dependency management tool to precisely track and manage dependencies, including