Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
164 lines (127 loc) · 14.5 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

164 lines (127 loc) · 14.5 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for usememos/memos

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Robust Access Control for Memos

  • Description:

    1. Define Memo Sharing Model: Clearly define how memos are shared (e.g., private by default, shared with specific users, public within an organization - based on Memos' features).
    2. Implement Access Control Checks for Memo Operations: Enforce access control checks for all memo-related operations: creating, reading, updating, deleting, and sharing memos.
    3. Verify User Permissions Before Memo Access: Before displaying or allowing modification of a memo, verify that the current user has the necessary permissions based on the defined sharing model.
    4. Prevent Unauthorized Memo Listing: Ensure users can only list memos they are authorized to access, not all memos in the system.
    5. Audit Memo Sharing Changes: Log changes to memo sharing permissions for auditing and tracking purposes.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Unauthorized Access to Private Memos (High Severity): Prevents users from reading memos intended to be private or shared with a limited audience.
    • Unauthorized Modification of Memos (High Severity): Prevents users from altering memos they are not supposed to edit.
    • Data Breaches of Sensitive Memo Content (High Severity): Reduces the risk of confidential information within memos being exposed due to improper access control.
    • Accidental or Malicious Memo Disclosure (Medium Severity): Minimizes the chance of memos being unintentionally or maliciously shared with unauthorized individuals.

  • Impact:

    • Unauthorized Access to Private Memos: High reduction.
    • Unauthorized Modification of Memos: High reduction.
    • Data Breaches of Sensitive Memo Content: High reduction.
    • Accidental or Malicious Memo Disclosure: Medium reduction.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Likely implemented to a basic degree. Memos probably has user authentication and some form of access control to differentiate between users and their own memos. The extent of sharing control and fine-grained permissions needs verification in the Memos codebase.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Potentially lacks fine-grained control over memo sharing permissions (e.g., read-only vs. edit access for shared memos).
    • May need more detailed auditing of memo sharing changes.
    • Advanced access control models like RBAC or ABAC might be missing if Memos is intended for larger deployments or organizations.

Mitigation Strategy: Encryption at Rest for Memo Data in Memos Storage

  • Description:

    1. Encrypt Memo Database/Storage: Encrypt the specific storage mechanism used by Memos to store memo data. This could be a database, flat files, or other storage.
    2. Utilize Encryption Libraries/Features: Leverage database encryption features (like Transparent Data Encryption) or encryption libraries suitable for the chosen storage method.
    3. Secure Key Management for Memo Encryption: Implement secure key management specifically for the encryption keys used to protect memo data. Avoid storing keys in the application code or alongside the encrypted data.
    4. Ensure Memo Backups are Encrypted: If Memos includes backup functionality for memo data, ensure these backups are also encrypted using the same or comparable encryption methods.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Data Breaches from Memo Storage Compromise (High Severity): Protects memo content if the underlying storage (database, files) is compromised, physically stolen, or accessed by unauthorized individuals at the storage level.
    • Data Leaks from Memo Backups (High Severity): Prevents unauthorized access to memo data contained in backups.

  • Impact:

    • Data Breaches from Memo Storage Compromise: High reduction.
    • Data Leaks from Memo Backups: High reduction.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Unlikely to be implemented by default within Memos itself. Encryption at rest is typically a configuration concern at the database or operating system level, which users deploying Memos would need to configure separately. Memos itself might not enforce or provide built-in encryption.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Built-in encryption at rest for memo data is likely missing from Memos application itself. Users must implement this at the infrastructure level.
    • Key management specifically for memo data encryption would be absent within Memos.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Handling of Attachments in Memos (If Applicable)

  • Description:

    1. Secure Attachment Storage Location for Memos: Store attachments associated with memos in a secure directory outside the web application's publicly accessible folder.
    2. Memo-Based Access Control for Attachments: Link attachment access directly to memo access control. Users should only be able to download attachments if they are authorized to view the associated memo.
    3. Attachment Type Validation for Memos: Implement strict file type validation for attachments uploaded to memos to prevent malicious file uploads. Restrict allowed file extensions to necessary types.
    4. Attachment Content Sanitization for Memos: Sanitize attachment content where feasible (e.g., image metadata removal, text encoding checks) to mitigate potential risks.
    5. Malware Scanning for Memo Attachments: Integrate malware scanning for files uploaded as memo attachments to detect and prevent the storage of malicious files.
    6. Secure Download Mechanism for Memo Attachments: Implement a secure download process for memo attachments that enforces access control and avoids direct, publicly accessible URLs to attachment files.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Malicious File Uploads via Memos (High Severity): Prevents users from uploading and potentially executing malicious files through the memo attachment feature.
    • Unauthorized Access to Memo Attachments (High Severity): Prevents unauthorized users from downloading attachments linked to memos they shouldn't access.
    • Data Breaches via Memo Attachment Exposure (High Severity): Protects sensitive information potentially contained within memo attachments from unauthorized access.
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Memo Attachments (Medium Severity): Mitigates XSS risks from malicious filenames or file content when attachments are displayed or downloaded in the context of memos.

  • Impact:

    • Malicious File Uploads via Memos: High reduction.
    • Unauthorized Access to Memo Attachments: High reduction.
    • Data Breaches via Memo Attachment Exposure: High reduction.
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Memo Attachments: Medium reduction.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Basic file type validation for memo attachments might be present. Access control linking attachments to memos is likely implemented to some extent.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Malware scanning for memo attachments is likely missing.
    • Attachment content sanitization for memos might be absent or incomplete.
    • The download mechanism for memo attachments could be improved for better security and access control.

Mitigation Strategy: Strict Input Validation for Memo Content and Metadata

  • Description:

    1. Validate Memo Content Input: Implement robust input validation for the main memo content field to prevent injection attacks and ensure data integrity.
    2. Validate Memo Metadata Input: Validate input for memo titles, tags, and any other metadata associated with memos to prevent injection and data corruption.
    3. Enforce Input Limits for Memos: Set limits on the length and complexity of memo content and metadata to prevent denial-of-service and buffer overflow vulnerabilities.
    4. Whitelist Allowed Characters/Formats in Memos: Use a whitelist approach to define allowed characters and formatting within memo content and metadata, rejecting any input that doesn't conform.
    5. Server-Side Validation for Memo Input: Perform input validation on the server-side to ensure it cannot be bypassed by client-side manipulation.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Memos (High Severity): Prevents injection of malicious scripts within memo content or metadata that could be executed when memos are viewed.
    • SQL Injection in Memo Queries (High Severity - if applicable): Prevents SQL injection vulnerabilities if memo content or metadata is used in database queries without proper sanitization (less likely for memo content itself, more relevant for search features).
    • Denial of Service (DoS) via Malformed Memos (Medium Severity): Prevents DoS attacks caused by excessively large or complex memo content.
    • Data Corruption in Memos (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of data corruption due to invalid or unexpected characters in memo content or metadata.

  • Impact:

    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Memos: High reduction.
    • SQL Injection in Memo Queries: High reduction (if applicable).
    • Denial of Service (DoS) via Malformed Memos: Medium reduction.
    • Data Corruption in Memos: Medium reduction.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Likely implements some basic input validation, such as length limits for memo content.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • May lack comprehensive validation for all aspects of memo content and metadata, especially for rich text or Markdown formatting if supported.
    • Whitelist approach for allowed characters and formats in memos might not be consistently applied.

Mitigation Strategy: Context-Aware Output Sanitization for Memo Display

  • Description:

    1. Identify Memo Output Contexts: Determine all contexts where memo content and metadata are displayed (e.g., web page display, API responses, notifications).
    2. Apply Context-Specific Sanitization for Memos: Apply appropriate output sanitization methods based on the context where memos are displayed. For HTML display, use HTML escaping. For API responses, use appropriate encoding.
    3. Sanitize Memo Content Before Display: Sanitize memo content and metadata just before rendering it in the chosen output context. Avoid sanitizing data when it's stored.
    4. Secure Markdown Rendering for Memos (if applicable): If Memos supports Markdown in memo content, use a secure Markdown rendering library that prevents XSS vulnerabilities. Configure it to sanitize or disallow potentially dangerous HTML or JavaScript.
    5. Regularly Update Sanitization Libraries for Memos: Keep sanitization libraries and Markdown renderers used for memo display up-to-date to patch any security vulnerabilities.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Memo Display (High Severity): Prevents XSS vulnerabilities when displaying memo content in web pages or other contexts by sanitizing user-generated content.

  • Impact:

    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Memo Display: High reduction.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Likely implements basic HTML escaping when displaying memo content in web pages.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Context-aware sanitization might not be consistently applied across all memo output contexts.
    • Secure Markdown rendering for memos might be missing or misconfigured if Markdown is supported, potentially leading to XSS.
    • Regular updates of sanitization libraries used for memo display might not be consistently performed.

Mitigation Strategy: Security of Memos API for Memo Access (If Applicable)

  • Description:

    1. API Authentication for Memo Access: Implement robust authentication for the Memos API to control access to memo data programmatically. Use API keys, OAuth 2.0, or similar secure authentication methods.
    2. API Authorization for Memo Operations: Enforce strict authorization checks in the API to ensure API clients can only access and modify memos they are permitted to based on user permissions and the memo sharing model.
    3. API Rate Limiting for Memo Endpoints: Implement rate limiting and throttling for API endpoints related to memo access to prevent abuse and denial-of-service attacks.
    4. API Input Validation and Output Sanitization for Memos: Apply input validation and output sanitization specifically tailored to the data formats and parameters used by the Memos API endpoints.
    5. Secure API Documentation for Memo Access: Provide clear and secure documentation for the Memos API, including authentication and authorization methods, to guide developers in using the API securely.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Unauthorized API Access to Memos (High Severity): Prevents unauthorized programmatic access to memo data via the API.
    • API Abuse and Denial of Service (Medium Severity): Protects the API from abuse and DoS attacks through rate limiting and throttling.
    • Data Breaches via API Exploitation (High Severity): Reduces the risk of data breaches through vulnerabilities in the Memos API.
    • Injection Attacks via API Endpoints (Medium to High Severity): Prevents injection attacks through API endpoints by implementing input validation and output sanitization.

  • Impact:

    • Unauthorized API Access to Memos: High reduction.
    • API Abuse and Denial of Service: Medium reduction.
    • Data Breaches via API Exploitation: High reduction.
    • Injection Attacks via API Endpoints: Medium to High reduction.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • API authentication and authorization might be implemented if Memos has a public API, but the robustness and security of these mechanisms need to be assessed.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • API rate limiting and throttling for memo-related endpoints might be missing.
    • Input validation and output sanitization specific to API parameters and responses related to memos might need improvement.
    • Secure API documentation focused on security best practices for memo access might be lacking.