Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
107 lines (97 loc) · 8.49 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

107 lines (97 loc) · 8.49 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for usememos/memos

Objective: To compromise an application using Memos by exploiting vulnerabilities within Memos itself, leading to unauthorized access, data manipulation, or disruption of service.

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Memos Application (Attacker Goal) **[CRITICAL NODE]**
├── Exploit Input Handling Vulnerabilities **[CRITICAL NODE]**
│   ├── Markdown Injection (Stored XSS) **[HIGH RISK]**
│   │   └── Inject malicious Markdown in memos to execute scripts in other users' browsers. **[HIGH RISK]**
│   ├── Malicious File Upload **[CRITICAL NODE]**
│   │   ├── Upload and Execute Server-Side Malicious Files **[HIGH RISK]**
│   │   │   └── Bypass file type restrictions to upload and execute web shells or executables. **[HIGH RISK]**
├── Bypass Access Controls **[CRITICAL NODE]**
│   ├── Authorization Bypass - Memo Visibility **[HIGH RISK]**
│   │   └── Exploit flaws in memo sharing/visibility logic to access private memos without authorization. **[HIGH RISK]**
│   ├── API Authentication/Authorization Bypass (If API is exposed/used by the application) **[HIGH RISK]**
│   │   └── Exploit vulnerabilities in API authentication or authorization mechanisms to gain unauthorized access to Memos API. **[HIGH RISK]**

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Input Handling Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Markdown Injection (Stored XSS) [HIGH RISK]:

    • Attack Vector: Injecting malicious Markdown code within memos.
    • Attack Step:
      • Attacker crafts a memo containing malicious Markdown, specifically JavaScript code embedded within Markdown formatting.
      • This memo is stored in the Memos application's database.
      • When other users view this memo, their browsers render the Markdown.
      • Due to insufficient sanitization, the malicious JavaScript is executed in the victim's browser context.
    • Potential Impact:
      • Session Hijacking: Stealing user session cookies to impersonate the victim.
      • Data Theft: Accessing sensitive data visible to the victim within the application.
      • Account Takeover: Performing actions on behalf of the victim.
      • Malware Distribution: Redirecting users to malicious websites or initiating downloads.
    • Actionable Insights:
      • Implement robust server-side Markdown sanitization using a well-vetted library.
      • Configure the Markdown parser to strip or encode potentially harmful HTML tags and JavaScript.
      • Deploy a strict Content Security Policy (CSP) to prevent execution of inline scripts and restrict script sources to trusted origins.
      • Regularly update the Markdown parsing library to patch known vulnerabilities.

  • Malicious File Upload [CRITICAL NODE]:

    • Upload and Execute Server-Side Malicious Files [HIGH RISK]:
      • Attack Vector: Uploading a malicious file (e.g., web shell) and executing it on the server.
      • Attack Step:
        • Attacker attempts to upload a file designed for server-side execution (e.g., a PHP, Python, or JSP web shell).
        • Attacker tries to bypass file type restrictions by:
          • Renaming the file with a permitted extension (e.g., from shell.php to shell.png.php).
          • Using double extensions or other bypass techniques.
        • If successful, the malicious file is stored on the server.
        • Attacker then accesses the uploaded file directly through a web request, triggering its execution by the web server.
      • Potential Impact:
        • Remote Code Execution (RCE): Gaining complete control over the web server.
        • Data Breach: Accessing and exfiltrating sensitive data from the server.
        • System Compromise: Using the compromised server as a launchpad for further attacks on internal networks or other systems.
        • Denial of Service (DoS): Disrupting the application's availability.
      • Actionable Insights:
        • Implement strict server-side file type validation. Do not rely solely on client-side checks or file extensions.
        • Use content-based file type detection (magic bytes, MIME type sniffing) to verify the true file type.
        • Store uploaded files outside the web server's document root to prevent direct execution.
        • Configure the web server to prevent execution of scripts in the upload directory (e.g., using .htaccess in Apache or location blocks in Nginx).
        • Implement regular security scanning and vulnerability assessments of the server environment.

Attack Tree Path: Bypass Access Controls [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Authorization Bypass - Memo Visibility [HIGH RISK]:

    • Attack Vector: Exploiting flaws in the logic that controls access to memos based on their visibility settings (private, public, shared).
    • Attack Step:
      • Attacker identifies or discovers vulnerabilities in the application's code related to memo visibility checks.
      • This could involve:
        • Parameter manipulation in web requests to access memos marked as private.
        • Exploiting logical flaws in the sharing mechanism to gain unauthorized access.
        • Bypassing access control checks due to incorrect implementation or missing checks in certain code paths.
      • If successful, the attacker can view, modify, or delete memos they are not authorized to access, including private memos containing sensitive information.
    • Potential Impact:
      • Unauthorized Access to Sensitive Data: Exposure of confidential information stored in private memos.
      • Data Breach: Potential leakage of sensitive organizational or personal data.
      • Integrity Compromise: Unauthorized modification or deletion of memos.
      • Privacy Violation: Breach of user privacy by accessing private communications.
    • Actionable Insights:
      • Conduct a thorough security review of all code related to memo visibility and sharing logic.
      • Implement a robust and well-defined access control model (RBAC or ABAC).
      • Enforce authorization checks consistently at every point where memo data is accessed or modified.
      • Use automated testing to verify authorization rules for different user roles and memo visibility settings.
      • Perform penetration testing to identify potential authorization bypass vulnerabilities.

  • API Authentication/Authorization Bypass (If API is exposed/used by the application) [HIGH RISK]:

    • Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities in the authentication or authorization mechanisms protecting the Memos API.
    • Attack Step:
      • Attacker targets the Memos API endpoints, attempting to bypass authentication or authorization.
      • This could involve:
        • Exploiting weaknesses in the API authentication scheme (e.g., weak or default credentials, insecure token generation).
        • Bypassing authorization checks by manipulating API requests or exploiting logical flaws in authorization code.
        • Exploiting vulnerabilities in the API framework or libraries used.
      • If successful, the attacker gains unauthorized access to the API, allowing them to perform actions as any user or administrator, depending on the severity of the bypass.
    • Potential Impact:
      • Full Application Compromise: API access often grants broad control over the application's functionalities and data.
      • Data Breach: Accessing, modifying, or deleting all memos and potentially user data.
      • Account Takeover: Creating, modifying, or deleting user accounts.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Abusing API endpoints to overload the server.
    • Actionable Insights:
      • Implement strong API authentication using industry-standard protocols like JWT or OAuth 2.0.
      • Enforce robust authorization checks for every API endpoint and action, based on user roles and permissions.
      • Validate and sanitize all input to API endpoints to prevent injection vulnerabilities.
      • Implement API rate limiting to prevent brute-force attacks and DoS attempts.
      • Regularly audit and monitor API access and usage for suspicious activity.