Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
75 lines (66 loc) · 6.16 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

75 lines (66 loc) · 6.16 KB

Threat Model Analysis for valyala/fasthttp

Threat: HTTP Request Smuggling

  • Description:
    • Attacker crafts malicious HTTP requests that are parsed differently by fasthttp compared to other HTTP components (e.g., proxies, backend servers).
    • This parsing discrepancy allows attackers to "smuggle" requests, bypassing security controls and manipulating request routing.
    • For instance, an attacker might embed a second request within the headers or body of the first in a way that fasthttp sees one request, but a backend server sees two.
  • Impact:
    • Bypass of security controls like Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) and authentication mechanisms.
    • Unauthorized access to resources by routing smuggled requests to unintended endpoints.
    • Data leakage through manipulated request processing and response handling.
    • Cache poisoning by injecting malicious content into caches.
  • Affected fasthttp component:
    • HTTP Request Parsing Module (specifically header and body parsing logic).
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Standardize HTTP Parsing: Ensure consistent and strict HTTP parsing across all HTTP components in the application architecture.
    • Rigorous Testing: Conduct thorough testing with diverse HTTP clients and proxies to detect parsing inconsistencies.
    • Robust Reverse Proxy: Utilize a security-focused reverse proxy in front of fasthttp to normalize and sanitize incoming requests.
    • Careful Header Handling: Pay close attention to header processing and forwarding to ensure consistent interpretation throughout the system.

Threat: Body Parsing Vulnerabilities (Buffer/Integer Overflows)

  • Description:
    • Attacker sends crafted, large, or malformed HTTP request bodies to exploit weaknesses in fasthttp's body parsing.
    • Vulnerabilities in parsing logic, especially with large or unusual bodies, can lead to buffer overflows, integer overflows, or memory corruption.
    • This can be triggered by oversized bodies, deeply nested data structures, or specific byte sequences designed to exploit parsing flaws.
  • Impact:
    • Denial of Service (DoS): Application crashes or becomes unresponsive due to memory corruption or resource exhaustion.
    • Remote Code Execution (RCE): In severe cases of memory corruption, attackers might achieve arbitrary code execution on the server.
  • Affected fasthttp component:
    • HTTP Request Body Parsing Module (functions handling body reading and parsing, potentially content-type specific parsing).
  • Risk Severity: High (potential for RCE)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Regular Updates: Keep fasthttp updated to benefit from parsing bug fixes and security patches.
    • Input Validation and Sanitization: Validate and sanitize request bodies, especially for file uploads or complex data. Implement size and format checks.
    • Request Body Size Limits: Enforce limits on maximum request body size in fasthttp or the application.
    • Resource Limits: Implement resource limits (memory, CPU) to contain the impact of resource exhaustion attacks.
    • Fuzzing and Security Audits: Conduct fuzzing and security audits to identify parsing vulnerabilities.

Threat: Double-Free or Use-After-Free Vulnerabilities

  • Description:
    • Incorrect memory management within fasthttp can lead to double-free or use-after-free vulnerabilities.
    • These occur when memory is freed multiple times or accessed after being freed, often due to errors in pointer manipulation or resource lifecycle management.
    • These vulnerabilities can arise in memory handling for requests, responses, or connections.
  • Impact:
    • Application Crashes: Double-free or use-after-free errors frequently cause immediate crashes.
    • Remote Code Execution (RCE): In exploitable scenarios, attackers might manipulate memory for remote code execution.
  • Affected fasthttp component:
    • Memory Management within fasthttp (low-level memory operations related to request/response lifecycle, connection handling, and buffer management).
  • Risk Severity: Critical (potential for RCE)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Careful Code Audits: Thoroughly audit code, focusing on memory management in fasthttp (if modifying) and application code interacting with it.
    • Memory Safety Tools: Use memory safety tools (address sanitizers, memory debuggers) during development and testing.
    • Strict Memory Practices: Adhere to strict memory management practices, minimizing manual management and carefully managing resource lifecycles.
    • Regular Updates: Keep fasthttp updated to benefit from fixes for memory management issues.

Threat: Vulnerabilities in fasthttp Specific Features

  • Description:
    • Applications using non-standard fasthttp features or extensions (beyond core HTTP) might encounter vulnerabilities due to reduced maturity and testing of these features.
    • Examples include specific connection pooling, custom header handling extensions, or experimental functionalities.
  • Impact:
    • Depends on the specific feature and vulnerability. Impacts can range from Denial of Service (DoS) to Remote Code Execution (RCE).
  • Affected fasthttp component:
    • Specific fasthttp Features or Extensions (e.g., connection pooling, custom header handling).
  • Risk Severity: High (in cases leading to RCE or significant DoS)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Minimize Non-Standard Features: Prefer standard HTTP features to reduce reliance on less tested fasthttp extensions.
    • Careful Evaluation and Testing: If using specific features, thoroughly evaluate security implications and conduct rigorous security testing.
    • Security Advisory Monitoring: Monitor fasthttp security advisories and bug reports related to used features.
    • Feature Isolation: Isolate potentially risky features within the application architecture to limit vulnerability impact.