Mitigation Strategy: Strict Header Validation (within fasthttp
Handlers)
-
Mitigation Strategy: Strict Header Validation (within
fasthttp
Handlers)-
Description:
- Identify Critical Headers: Determine which HTTP headers are crucial for security and application logic within the context of your
fasthttp
application (e.g.,Content-Length
,Transfer-Encoding
,Host
,Content-Type
). - Implement Validation Functions: Create dedicated functions within your
fasthttp
request handlers to validate each critical header. These functions should:- Access header values using
fasthttp
's API (e.g.,ctx.Request.Header.Peek("Content-Length")
). - Check for the presence/absence of the header as required.
- Verify the header's format against RFC specifications and application-specific rules. Use regular expressions or dedicated parsing libraries where appropriate.
- Handle multiple occurrences of the header (e.g., reject requests with multiple
Content-Length
headers).fasthttp
provides methods likeVisitAll
to iterate over headers. - Handle potentially conflicting headers (e.g.,
Content-Length
vs.Transfer-Encoding
).
- Access header values using
- Integrate Validation: Call these validation functions within the
fasthttp
request handler before processing the request body or performing any sensitive operations. Usectx.Error
to immediately return an error if validation fails. - Reject Invalid Requests: If any header validation fails, immediately return an appropriate HTTP error response using
ctx.Error(fasthttp.StatusBadRequest, "Invalid Header")
. Do not proceed with request processing. - Regularly Review and Update: Periodically review the header validation logic to ensure it remains up-to-date.
- Identify Critical Headers: Determine which HTTP headers are crucial for security and application logic within the context of your
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Request Smuggling (High Severity): Prevents attackers from injecting malicious requests by exploiting inconsistencies in header parsing, specifically within
fasthttp
's handling. - Header Injection (High Severity): Mitigates attacks where malicious headers are injected to bypass security controls or manipulate application logic, focusing on vulnerabilities within
fasthttp
. - HTTP Parameter Pollution (Medium Severity): Can help prevent attacks that exploit multiple occurrences of the same header, as handled by
fasthttp
.
- Request Smuggling (High Severity): Prevents attackers from injecting malicious requests by exploiting inconsistencies in header parsing, specifically within
-
Impact:
- Request Smuggling: Risk significantly reduced (from High to Low, assuming proper implementation and testing, focusing on
fasthttp
's internal handling). - Header Injection: Risk significantly reduced (from High to Low, within the context of
fasthttp
). - HTTP Parameter Pollution: Risk reduced (from Medium to Low, as handled by
fasthttp
).
- Request Smuggling: Risk significantly reduced (from High to Low, assuming proper implementation and testing, focusing on
-
Currently Implemented:
- Basic
Content-Length
check inrequestHandler
function (prevents excessively large bodies) usingctx.Request.Header.ContentLength()
. Host
header validation against a whitelist in thevalidateHost
function, usingctx.Request.Header.Host()
.
- Basic
-
Missing Implementation:
- Comprehensive
Transfer-Encoding
validation (especially forchunked
encoding) is missing. This is a critical gap. Needs to be implemented in a new function,validateTransferEncoding
, usingctx.Request.Header.Peek("Transfer-Encoding")
andctx.Request.Header.VisitAll
, and called withinrequestHandler
. - Validation of other headers like
Content-Type
is basic and needs to be more robust, usingfasthttp
's header access methods. - No specific handling of multiple header occurrences (except for a basic check on
Content-Length
). Needs to be added to all header validation logic, utilizingctx.Request.Header.VisitAll
.
- Comprehensive
-
Mitigation Strategy: fasthttp.Server
Configuration for Resource Control
-
Mitigation Strategy:
fasthttp.Server
Configuration for Resource Control-
Description:
- Analyze Resource Usage: Profile the
fasthttp
application under load to identify potential bottlenecks and resource limits. - Configure
fasthttp.Server
: Directly within the code that initializes thefasthttp.Server
, set appropriate values for the following parameters:MaxConnsPerIP
: Limit connections per IP using thisfasthttp.Server
setting.MaxRequestsPerConn
: Limit requests per connection using this setting.Concurrency
: Limit overall concurrent connections.ReadTimeout
,WriteTimeout
,IdleTimeout
: Set timeouts to prevent slow clients.MaxRequestBodySize
: Limit request body size.MaxHeaderBytes
: Limit the size of request headers.
- Monitor and Adjust: Continuously monitor resource usage and adjust the configuration parameters as needed.
- Analyze Resource Usage: Profile the
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Denial of Service (DoS) (High Severity): Prevents attackers from overwhelming the
fasthttp
server with requests, exhausting resources. - Slowloris Attacks (Medium Severity): Mitigates attacks that hold connections open for extended periods, leveraging
fasthttp
's timeout settings. - Large Request Body Attacks (Medium Severity): Prevents attackers from sending massive request bodies to consume memory, directly controlled by
fasthttp.Server.MaxRequestBodySize
. - Large Header Attacks (Medium Severity): Prevents attacks using excessively large headers, controlled by
fasthttp.Server.MaxHeaderBytes
.
- Denial of Service (DoS) (High Severity): Prevents attackers from overwhelming the
-
Impact:
- DoS: Risk significantly reduced (from High to Medium, depending on the attack and configuration).
- Slowloris Attacks: Risk reduced (from Medium to Low).
- Large Request Body Attacks: Risk reduced (from Medium to Low).
- Large Header Attacks: Risk reduced (from Medium to Low).
-
Currently Implemented:
MaxRequestBodySize
is set in themain
function when initializing thefasthttp.Server
.ReadTimeout
,WriteTimeout
, andIdleTimeout
are configured.
-
Missing Implementation:
MaxConnsPerIP
,MaxRequestsPerConn
, andConcurrency
are not explicitly configured. These need to be explicitly set in thefasthttp.Server
initialization inmain
.MaxHeaderBytes
is not set. Add tofasthttp.Server
initialization.
-
Mitigation Strategy: Safe fasthttp
Byte Slice Handling
-
Mitigation Strategy: Safe
fasthttp
Byte Slice Handling-
Description:
- Identify
fasthttp
Byte Slice Sources: Identify all points in the code where byte slices are obtained fromfasthttp
's API (e.g.,ctx.Request.Header.Peek
,ctx.PostBody()
,ctx.FormValue()
). - Copy Data When Needed: If the data from these
fasthttp
-provided byte slices needs to be used after thefasthttp
request handler (ctx
's lifetime) returns, always create a copy. Useappend([]byte{}, slice...)
orcopy(dst, src)
. - Avoid Global References: Never store direct references to
fasthttp
byte slices in global variables or long-lived data structures. The memory may be reused byfasthttp
. - Code Review: Conduct thorough code reviews, specifically focusing on how byte slices obtained from
fasthttp
are used. - Fuzz test fasthttp handlers: Use a fuzzer to generate various inputs and test if application is handling byte slices correctly.
- Identify
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Data Corruption (High Severity): Prevents unexpected modification of data due to
fasthttp
reusing byte slices. - Information Disclosure (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of leaking sensitive data if
fasthttp
's internal byte slices are inadvertently exposed. - Application Instability (Medium Severity): Prevents crashes or unexpected behavior caused by incorrect handling of
fasthttp
's byte slices.
- Data Corruption (High Severity): Prevents unexpected modification of data due to
-
Impact:
- Data Corruption: Risk significantly reduced (from High to Low).
- Information Disclosure: Risk reduced (from Medium to Low).
- Application Instability: Risk reduced (from Medium to Low).
-
Currently Implemented:
- Some instances of copying byte slices are present (e.g., when logging request bodies).
-
Missing Implementation:
- A systematic review of all
fasthttp
byte slice usage is missing. This needs to be performed across the entire codebase. - No fuzz testing is currently implemented.
- A systematic review of all
-
Mitigation Strategy: Avoid Deprecated/Unsafe fasthttp
Functions
-
Mitigation Strategy: Avoid Deprecated/Unsafe
fasthttp
Functions-
Description:
- Review
fasthttp
Documentation: Carefully review thefasthttp
documentation and identify any deprecated or unsafe functions within thefasthttp
library itself. - Code Audit: Perform a code audit to identify any instances of these
fasthttp
functions being used. - Replace with Safe Alternatives: Replace any deprecated or unsafe
fasthttp
functions with their recommended safe alternatives, as provided in thefasthttp
documentation. - Regularly Check for Updates: Periodically check the
fasthttp
documentation for new deprecations or warnings, especially after updating thefasthttp
library.
- Review
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Various Vulnerabilities (Severity Varies): Mitigates vulnerabilities that might be present in deprecated or unsafe functions within the
fasthttp
library. The specific threats depend on the function. - Maintainability Issues (Low Severity): Improves maintainability.
- Various Vulnerabilities (Severity Varies): Mitigates vulnerabilities that might be present in deprecated or unsafe functions within the
-
Impact:
- Various Vulnerabilities: Risk reduced (severity depends on the specific vulnerability).
- Maintainability Issues: Risk reduced (from Low to Negligible).
-
Currently Implemented:
- A basic check for
RequestCtx.URI().FullURI()
usage was performed.
- A basic check for
-
Missing Implementation:
- A comprehensive audit for all deprecated or unsafe
fasthttp
functions is missing. This needs to be performed regularly.
- A comprehensive audit for all deprecated or unsafe
-