Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
87 lines (78 loc) · 10.5 KB

File metadata and controls

87 lines (78 loc) · 10.5 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for vitessio/vitess

  • Mitigation Strategy: TLS Client Certificates for Vitess Internal Communication
  • Description:
    1. Generate TLS certificates and keys specifically for Vitess components (vtgate, vtctld, vttablet). Ensure each component type has a distinct certificate/key pair if needed for granular control.
    2. Configure vtgate and vtctld to enforce client certificate authentication for incoming gRPC connections originating from vttablets and other internal Vitess services. Utilize the --tablet_client_cert, --tablet_client_key, and --tablet_server_ca flags during vtgate and vtctld startup. The --tablet_server_ca should point to the Certificate Authority (CA) certificate used to sign vttablet certificates.
    3. Configure vttablets to present client certificates during connection establishment with vtgate and vtctld. Employ the --tablet_server_cert, --tablet_server_key, and --tablet_client_ca flags for vttablets. The --tablet_client_ca should point to the CA certificate used to sign vtgate and vtctld certificates.
    4. Securely distribute and manage the CA certificates to all relevant Vitess components. Implement a secure mechanism for certificate storage and rotation.
    5. Restart all Vitess components (vtgate, vtctld, vttablets) to activate the TLS client certificate authentication.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks within the Vitess cluster (High Severity): Prevents unauthorized interception and decryption of communication between Vitess internal components, safeguarding sensitive data and control commands.
    • Unauthorized Vitess component joining the cluster (Medium Severity): Restricts the ability of rogue or compromised services masquerading as legitimate Vitess components to connect and potentially disrupt or compromise the cluster.
  • Impact:
    • MITM attacks within the Vitess cluster (High Reduction): TLS client certificates provide strong mutual authentication and encryption, significantly minimizing the risk of MITM attacks targeting internal Vitess communication channels.
    • Unauthorized Vitess component joining the cluster (Medium Reduction): Substantially reduces the threat by requiring cryptographic proof of identity for each component. However, compromise of the CA or private keys remains a potential risk.
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Implemented in the Staging environment for vtgate to vttablet communication using self-signed certificates.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Not fully implemented in Production environment.
    • Not implemented for vtctld communication in either Staging or Production.
    • Transition to certificates signed by a trusted CA is needed for Production.
    • Automated certificate rotation and management system is absent.
  • Mitigation Strategy: vtctld Authentication Enforcement
  • Description:
    1. Select an appropriate authentication method for vtctld. Vitess offers built-in Access Control Lists (ACLs) via the --auth_credentials_file flag. For more robust solutions, consider integrating with external authentication providers using custom authentication plugins (if available and feasible for your environment). For simplicity, we'll focus on --auth_credentials_file.
    2. Create a secure authentication credentials file (e.g., vtctld_auth.json) that defines authorized users and their corresponding credentials (usernames and passwords, or other authentication tokens).
    3. Launch vtctld with the --auth_credentials_file flag pointing to the newly created credentials file. This activates authentication enforcement for vtctld operations.
    4. Configure vtctld client tools (vtctlclient) to supply authentication credentials when connecting to vtctld. This typically involves setting environment variables or using command-line flags as dictated by the chosen authentication method.
    5. Restrict access to the authentication credentials file itself. Ensure only authorized administrators have read access to this file to prevent credential compromise.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized administrative access to Vitess cluster via vtctld (High Severity): Prevents unauthorized individuals from executing administrative commands through vtctld, which could lead to critical misconfigurations, data manipulation, service disruption, or complete cluster takeover.
  • Impact:
    • Unauthorized administrative access to Vitess cluster via vtctld (High Reduction): Enforcing authentication effectively blocks unauthorized access to vtctld's administrative functionalities, significantly mitigating the risk of administrative-level attacks and accidental misconfigurations by unauthorized users.
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Basic password authentication using --auth_credentials_file is enabled in the Development environment.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Not implemented in Staging or Production environments.
    • Consider stronger authentication mechanisms for Production, potentially exploring custom authentication plugins for integration with existing identity management systems.
    • Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) within vtctld is not configured to further refine administrative permissions.
  • Mitigation Strategy: TLS Encryption for Client to vtgate Connections
  • Description:
    1. Generate TLS certificates and keys specifically for vtgate's MySQL protocol server. These certificates will be used to encrypt client connections using the MySQL protocol.
    2. Configure vtgate to enable TLS for incoming MySQL protocol connections. Use the --mysql_server_cert and --mysql_server_key flags when starting vtgate, pointing to the generated certificate and key files.
    3. Instruct client applications to establish connections to vtgate using TLS. This usually involves modifying connection strings or client library configurations to specify TLS/SSL mode and potentially provide a CA certificate to verify the vtgate server certificate.
    4. Enforce TLS-only connections on vtgate (Strongly Recommended). Configure vtgate to reject any connection attempts that do not utilize TLS. This ensures all client-server communication is encrypted. This enforcement might involve specific vtgate configuration settings or firewall rules.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks on client-to-vtgate connections (High Severity): Prevents attackers from intercepting and eavesdropping on sensitive data exchanged between client applications and vtgate, such as queries, results, and potentially credentials.
    • Data breaches due to unencrypted data in transit between clients and Vitess (High Severity): Protects confidential application data and database credentials from exposure during transmission over the network.
  • Impact:
    • MITM attacks on client-to-vtgate connections (High Reduction): TLS encryption provides robust protection against eavesdropping and tampering, effectively eliminating the risk of MITM attacks targeting client-vtgate communication.
    • Data breaches due to unencrypted data in transit (High Reduction): Guarantees confidentiality of data transmitted between clients and vtgate, significantly reducing the risk of data exposure during transit.
  • Currently Implemented:
    • TLS encryption is enabled for client connections to vtgate in the Production environment, currently using self-signed certificates.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Reliance on self-signed certificates in Production is a security concern. Transition to certificates signed by a trusted Certificate Authority (CA) is crucial.
    • Certificate rotation and automated management processes are needed for long-term maintenance.
    • Enforcement of TLS-only connections is not fully implemented; vtgate might still accept non-TLS connections, leaving a potential vulnerability.
  • Mitigation Strategy: Vitess Component Patching and Updates
  • Description:
    1. Establish a process for monitoring Vitess security advisories and release notes. Subscribe to Vitess security mailing lists and regularly check the official Vitess GitHub repository for announcements.
    2. Develop a testing and staging environment that mirrors production. This allows for safe testing of updates before deploying to production.
    3. Promptly apply security patches and updates released by the Vitess project. Prioritize security updates and critical bug fixes.
    4. Follow a defined update procedure for Vitess components, ensuring minimal downtime and proper rollback mechanisms in case of issues. This procedure should include steps for backing up configurations and data before updates.
    5. Regularly review and update dependencies of Vitess components, including underlying operating systems, MySQL client libraries, and other software dependencies, to address potential vulnerabilities in these components.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Exploitation of known vulnerabilities in Vitess (High Severity): Failure to patch Vitess components leaves the system vulnerable to publicly known exploits, potentially leading to data breaches, service disruption, or complete system compromise.
  • Impact:
    • Exploitation of known vulnerabilities in Vitess (High Reduction): Regular patching and updates directly address known vulnerabilities, significantly reducing the risk of exploitation and maintaining a secure Vitess environment.
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Basic patching process exists, but it's largely manual and reactive.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Proactive monitoring of Vitess security advisories needs to be improved.
    • Automated or semi-automated patching process is not in place.
    • Formalized testing and staging environment for Vitess updates is not fully utilized.
    • Dependency scanning and automated updates for Vitess dependencies are missing.