Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
145 lines (125 loc) · 14.5 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

145 lines (125 loc) · 14.5 KB

Okay, let's perform a deep security analysis of Wox, based on the provided design review.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of Wox's key components, identify potential vulnerabilities, assess their impact, and propose actionable mitigation strategies. The analysis will focus on the core application, plugin architecture, and interactions with the operating system and external services. We aim to identify weaknesses that could lead to arbitrary code execution, privilege escalation, information disclosure, or denial of service.

  • Scope:

    • Wox Core Application (C#)
    • Plugin Manager (C#)
    • Plugin Architecture (C#, Python, and other potential languages)
    • Indexer (C#)
    • Interaction with File System and Windows Registry
    • Interaction with Web Services (via Plugins)
    • Build and Deployment Process (NSIS Installer, GitHub Actions)

  • Methodology:

    1. Architecture Review: Analyze the provided C4 diagrams and descriptions to understand the system's components, data flows, and trust boundaries.
    2. Threat Modeling: Identify potential threats based on the architecture, business risks, and data sensitivity. We'll use a combination of STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) and attack trees.
    3. Codebase Inference: Since we don't have direct access to the codebase, we'll infer potential vulnerabilities based on the design, common coding practices in C# and plugin development, and the nature of the application (a launcher).
    4. Mitigation Strategy Recommendation: Propose specific, actionable steps to address the identified vulnerabilities, prioritizing those with the highest impact and likelihood.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of each component, applying STRIDE:

  • UI (WPF):

    • Threats:
      • Tampering: Malicious JavaScript (if any web-based components are used within the UI) could manipulate the UI or intercept user input.
      • Information Disclosure: Poorly handled error messages or debugging information displayed in the UI could reveal sensitive information.
      • Input Validation Failures: XAML injection is a possibility, although less common than XSS.
    • Mitigation:
      • Strict input validation and sanitization of all user-provided data.
      • Avoid using web-based components within the UI unless absolutely necessary, and then apply robust web security best practices.
      • Ensure error messages are user-friendly and do not reveal sensitive information.
      • Disable debugging features in production builds.

  • Core (C#):

    • Threats:
      • Tampering: If an attacker can modify the Wox executable or its configuration files, they could alter its behavior.
      • Elevation of Privilege: Vulnerabilities in the core logic could allow an attacker to execute code with the privileges of the logged-in user (which is already an accepted risk, but we want to minimize further escalation).
      • Denial of Service: Resource exhaustion vulnerabilities (e.g., infinite loops, memory leaks) could make Wox unresponsive.
      • Information Disclosure: Leaking of user queries or other sensitive data handled by the core.
    • Mitigation:
      • Code signing of the Wox executable to detect tampering.
      • Regular security audits and code reviews.
      • Robust error handling and input validation.
      • Implement resource limits and timeouts to prevent denial-of-service attacks.
      • Minimize the amount of sensitive data stored or processed by the core.

  • Plugin Manager (C#):

    • Threats:
      • Spoofing: An attacker could create a malicious plugin that impersonates a legitimate plugin.
      • Tampering: An attacker could modify a legitimate plugin or the plugin manager itself.
      • Elevation of Privilege: The plugin manager is a critical security component. Vulnerabilities here could allow a malicious plugin to gain full control of the system. This is the highest-risk area.
      • Denial of Service: A malicious plugin could crash the plugin manager, making Wox unusable.
      • Improper Isolation: If plugins are not properly isolated, one plugin could interfere with another or access data it shouldn't.
    • Mitigation:
      • Mandatory Plugin Signing: This is the most crucial mitigation. Wox should only load plugins that have been signed by a trusted authority (e.g., the Wox development team or a designated plugin repository). The public key for verification should be embedded within Wox.
      • Sandboxing: Run plugins in a restricted environment (e.g., Windows AppContainer) to limit their access to the file system, registry, network, and other system resources. This is essential for mitigating the risk of malicious plugins.
      • Least Privilege: Plugins should be granted only the minimum necessary permissions. A permission model should be implemented, allowing users to control which resources a plugin can access.
      • Inter-Process Communication (IPC) Security: If plugins communicate with the core via IPC, the communication channel must be secured to prevent tampering and eavesdropping. Use named pipes with appropriate security descriptors or a secure RPC mechanism.
      • Resource Quotas: Limit the resources (CPU, memory, network bandwidth) that a plugin can consume to prevent denial-of-service attacks.

  • Plugins (C#, Python, etc.):

    • Threats: This is the largest attack surface. Plugins can introduce any type of vulnerability.
      • Spoofing: A malicious plugin could impersonate a legitimate service.
      • Tampering: A plugin could be modified to include malicious code.
      • Repudiation: A plugin could perform actions without proper logging, making it difficult to trace malicious activity.
      • Information Disclosure: A plugin could leak sensitive data it handles (e.g., API keys, user credentials).
      • Denial of Service: A plugin could crash or consume excessive resources.
      • Elevation of Privilege: A plugin could exploit vulnerabilities in the system or other applications to gain higher privileges.
      • Code Injection: If a plugin uses user input to construct commands or queries, it could be vulnerable to code injection attacks (e.g., SQL injection, command injection).
      • Dependency Vulnerabilities: Plugins may use third-party libraries that contain known vulnerabilities.
    • Mitigation:
      • All Plugin Manager Mitigations: These are inherited by the plugins.
      • Security Guidelines for Plugin Developers: Provide clear and comprehensive documentation on secure coding practices for plugin development, including input validation, output encoding, secure API usage, and vulnerability reporting.
      • Plugin Review Process (Optional but Recommended): Consider implementing a review process for plugins submitted to a central repository. This could involve manual code review, automated security scanning, or a combination of both.
      • User Education: Warn users about the risks of installing plugins from untrusted sources.
      • Dependency Scanning: Encourage plugin developers to use dependency scanning tools to identify and address known vulnerabilities in their dependencies.

  • Indexer (C#):

    • Threats:
      • Tampering: An attacker could modify the index to include malicious entries or exclude legitimate entries.
      • Information Disclosure: The index could potentially contain sensitive information about files and applications.
      • Denial of Service: A large or corrupted index could slow down Wox or make it unresponsive.
      • Path Traversal: Vulnerabilities in how the indexer handles file paths could allow it to access files outside of the intended scope.
    • Mitigation:
      • Access files and registry with the user's permissions (already in place).
      • Robust input validation and sanitization of file paths to prevent path traversal attacks.
      • Regularly validate the integrity of the index.
      • Limit the size of the index to prevent denial-of-service attacks.
      • Consider encrypting the index if it contains sensitive information (although this would impact performance).

  • File System and Windows Registry:

    • Threats: Wox relies on the security of the underlying operating system. It's assumed that standard Windows file system and registry permissions are in place.
    • Mitigation: Rely on the operating system's security mechanisms. Ensure Wox runs with the least privilege necessary (i.e., the user's privileges).

  • Web Services (via Plugins):

    • Threats:
      • Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks: If a plugin communicates with a web service over an insecure channel (HTTP), an attacker could intercept or modify the communication.
      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): If a plugin displays data from a web service without proper sanitization, it could be vulnerable to XSS attacks.
      • API Key Leakage: If a plugin stores API keys insecurely, they could be stolen by an attacker.
      • Injection Attacks: If a plugin uses user input to construct API requests, it could be vulnerable to injection attacks.
    • Mitigation:
      • Mandatory HTTPS: Plugins must use HTTPS for all communication with web services.
      • Secure API Key Storage: API keys should be stored securely, preferably using the Windows Credential Manager or a similar mechanism. They should never be hardcoded in the plugin code.
      • Input Validation and Output Encoding: Plugins should carefully validate all input and encode all output to prevent injection attacks and XSS.
      • Follow OWASP API Security Guidelines: Plugin developers should be aware of and follow best practices for securing APIs.

  • Build and Deployment Process (NSIS Installer, GitHub Actions):

    • Threats:
      • Compromised Build Server: If the build server is compromised, an attacker could inject malicious code into the Wox installer.
      • Tampered Installer: An attacker could modify the installer after it has been built.
      • Supply Chain Attacks: Vulnerabilities in the build tools (e.g., NSIS, GitHub Actions) could be exploited.
    • Mitigation:
      • Secure Build Server: The build server should be hardened and protected with strong access controls.
      • Code Signing: The installer must be code-signed to verify its authenticity and integrity.
      • Build Process Integrity Checks: Use checksums or other mechanisms to verify that the build process has not been tampered with.
      • Regularly Update Build Tools: Keep the build tools (NSIS, GitHub Actions, compiler) up to date to patch any known vulnerabilities.
      • Two-Factor Authentication: Require two-factor authentication for access to the build server and the GitHub repository.

3. Actionable Mitigation Strategies (Prioritized)

These are the most critical and actionable steps, prioritized by impact and feasibility:

  1. Implement Mandatory Plugin Signing: This is non-negotiable. Wox should refuse to load unsigned plugins. This prevents attackers from easily distributing malicious plugins.
  2. Implement Plugin Sandboxing (AppContainers): This is essential for limiting the damage a malicious plugin can do. AppContainers provide a robust and well-tested sandboxing mechanism on Windows.
  3. Develop Comprehensive Security Guidelines for Plugin Developers: This should cover all aspects of secure plugin development, including input validation, output encoding, secure API usage, and vulnerability reporting. Provide examples and code snippets.
  4. Implement a Plugin Permission Model: Allow users to control which resources (file system, registry, network) a plugin can access. Start with a restrictive default set of permissions.
  5. Integrate SAST and Dependency Scanning into the Build Process: This will help to identify vulnerabilities early in the development lifecycle. Use tools like SonarQube, Roslyn Security Analyzers, and OWASP Dependency-Check.
  6. Code Sign the Wox Installer: This is a standard practice for Windows applications and helps to prevent tampering.
  7. Implement a Vulnerability Disclosure Program: Encourage responsible reporting of security issues by providing a clear process for researchers to submit vulnerabilities.
  8. Regular Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits of the core Wox application and the plugin manager.
  9. Secure IPC: If using named pipes or other IPC mechanisms, ensure they are properly secured.
  10. Harden the Build Server: Restrict access, use strong passwords, and keep software up to date.

4. Addressing Questions and Assumptions

  • Web Services: Identifying the specific web services used by popular plugins is crucial. This allows for targeted threat modeling of those interactions. This requires research into the most popular plugins.
  • Monetization: Future monetization plans could introduce new attack vectors (e.g., payment processing, licensing). This should be considered in future security reviews.
  • Bug/Vulnerability Handling: A formal process is needed for handling user-reported issues, including a secure communication channel and a clear timeline for addressing vulnerabilities.
  • Logging: Wox should implement sufficient logging to aid in debugging and security investigations. Log events should include plugin loading, errors, and any security-relevant actions. Logs should be stored securely and protected from tampering.
  • Plugin Developer Documentation: Existing documentation should be reviewed and updated to include comprehensive security guidelines.

The assumptions made in the design review are generally reasonable. The reliance on the underlying Windows security model and the responsibility of plugin developers are significant factors. The plugin architecture is the most critical area for security focus. The recommended mitigations, especially plugin signing and sandboxing, are essential for mitigating the risks associated with third-party plugins.