Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
50 lines (41 loc) · 5.83 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

50 lines (41 loc) · 5.83 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for xtls/xray-core

Attack Surface: Insecure Configuration Files

  • Description: Sensitive information within xray-core configuration files (like private keys, credentials, routing rules) is exposed due to improper file permissions or insecure storage.
  • xray-core Contribution: xray-core relies on configuration files (config.json) to define its behavior. These files contain sensitive data necessary for its operation.
  • Example: A developer deploys an xray-core application and leaves the config.json file world-readable (chmod 777 config.json). An attacker gains access to the server, reads the configuration file, and extracts the server's private key, allowing them to impersonate the server or decrypt traffic.
  • Impact: Confidentiality breach, unauthorized access, server impersonation, data decryption.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Restrict file permissions: Ensure configuration files are readable only by the user running xray-core and the root user (e.g., chmod 600 config.json).
    • Secure storage: Store configuration files in encrypted volumes or secure configuration management systems.
    • Avoid hardcoding secrets: Use environment variables or secure secret management solutions to inject sensitive information instead of hardcoding them in the configuration file.

Attack Surface: Misconfigured Open Proxy

  • Description: xray-core is unintentionally configured to act as an open proxy, allowing anyone to relay traffic through it without authorization.
  • xray-core Contribution: xray-core's flexible routing and inbound/outbound configurations can be easily misconfigured to create an open proxy if access controls are not properly implemented within xray-core configuration.
  • Example: A developer sets up xray-core with a broad inbound configuration (e.g., allowing connections from 0.0.0.0/0) and forgets to implement proper authentication or access control rules in the routing section of xray-core config. Malicious actors discover this open proxy and use it to anonymize their traffic, bypass firewalls, or launch attacks against other systems.
  • Impact: Abuse of resources, reputational damage, potential legal liabilities, network security bypass.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement strong access controls within xray-core configuration: Use xray-core's routing features to restrict access to authorized users or IP ranges.
    • Default deny inbound rules: Configure inbound settings to only accept connections from explicitly allowed sources in xray-core config.
    • Regularly audit routing rules: Review xray-core routing configurations to ensure they are still valid and do not inadvertently create open proxy scenarios.

Attack Surface: Protocol Implementation Vulnerabilities (VMess, VLess, Trojan, etc.)

  • Description: Bugs or weaknesses in xray-core's implementation of proxy protocols (VMess, VLess, Trojan, etc.) can be exploited by attackers.
  • xray-core Contribution: xray-core implements various proxy protocols to facilitate secure communication. Vulnerabilities in these protocol implementations are inherent to xray-core's core functionality.
  • Example: A vulnerability exists in the VMess protocol parsing logic within xray-core. An attacker crafts a malicious VMess packet that, when processed by xray-core, triggers a buffer overflow, leading to remote code execution on the server running xray-core.
  • Impact: Remote code execution, denial of service, data corruption, information disclosure.
  • Risk Severity: Critical to High (depending on the vulnerability)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Keep xray-core updated: Regularly update xray-core to the latest version to patch known vulnerabilities.
    • Subscribe to security advisories: Monitor xtls/xray-core security advisories and mailing lists for vulnerability announcements and updates.
    • Use well-vetted protocols: Prioritize using protocols that are considered more secure and have undergone more scrutiny (e.g., Trojan, VLess with XTLS) when configuring xray-core.

Attack Surface: TLS/XTLS Implementation Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Vulnerabilities in xray-core's TLS or XTLS implementation can compromise the security of encrypted connections established by xray-core.
  • xray-core Contribution: xray-core relies on TLS and XTLS for securing communication channels. Bugs in these implementations directly impact the security of xray-core connections.
  • Example: A vulnerability in xray-core's TLS handshake implementation allows an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack and downgrade the connection to a weaker cipher suite or even plaintext, enabling traffic interception of traffic proxied by xray-core.
  • Impact: Man-in-the-middle attacks, data interception, data manipulation, loss of confidentiality and integrity of proxied traffic.
  • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the vulnerability)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Keep xray-core updated: Regularly update xray-core to benefit from TLS/XTLS security patches.
    • Use strong TLS/XTLS configurations in xray-core: Configure xray-core to use strong cipher suites, modern TLS/XTLS protocol versions, and disable insecure options.
    • Proper certificate management: Ensure valid and properly configured TLS certificates are used within xray-core configuration. Implement robust certificate validation on the client-side connecting to xray-core.