Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
57 lines (46 loc) · 5.57 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

57 lines (46 loc) · 5.57 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for xtls/xray-core

Attack Surface: 1. Misconfigured Inbound Listeners

  • Description: Incorrectly configured inbound connections, exposing the proxy to unauthorized access.
    • Xray-core Contribution: Xray-core provides a wide range of inbound protocols (Socks, HTTP, Shadowsocks, VMess, VLESS, Trojan, etc.), each requiring specific configuration. Complexity increases the risk of misconfiguration.
    • Example: A Socks proxy configured to listen on 0.0.0.0 (all interfaces) without authentication, allowing anyone on the network to use it.
    • Impact: Unauthorized access to the proxy, potential for attackers to relay traffic, mask their origin, or access internal networks.
    • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the network environment and exposed services).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Developers: Provide clear documentation and examples for secure inbound configurations. Implement input validation to prevent invalid configurations. Consider providing a "secure by default" configuration template.
      • Users: Bind listeners only to specific, necessary interfaces (e.g., 127.0.0.1 for local-only access). Always use strong authentication for inbound connections. Regularly audit inbound configurations. Use network firewalls to restrict access.

Attack Surface: 2. Protocol-Specific Vulnerabilities (Inbound/Outbound)

  • Description: Exploitation of vulnerabilities in the specific proxy protocols implemented by Xray-core.
    • Xray-core Contribution: Xray-core implements various protocols, each with its own potential security weaknesses (known or unknown).
    • Example: A zero-day vulnerability discovered in the VMess protocol implementation allowing for remote code execution.
    • Impact: Compromise of the proxy, traffic interception, modification, denial of service, or potentially remote code execution.
    • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the vulnerability and protocol).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Developers: Prioritize security audits and penetration testing of protocol implementations. Respond rapidly to security advisories and release patches promptly. Consider deprecating or removing support for less-secure protocols.
      • Users: Prefer modern, well-vetted protocols (VLESS, Trojan with strong configurations). Keep Xray-core updated to the latest version. Use an IDS/IPS to monitor for suspicious traffic.

Attack Surface: 3. Misconfigured Outbound Connections/Routing

  • Description: Incorrectly configured outbound protocols or routing rules, leading to unintended traffic destinations or data leaks.
    • Xray-core Contribution: Xray-core's powerful routing capabilities allow for complex outbound configurations, increasing the risk of misconfiguration.
    • Example: A routing rule misconfigured to send sensitive internal traffic to an external, untrusted server.
    • Impact: Data leakage, circumvention of security policies, potential exposure of internal systems.
    • Risk Severity: High (depending on the sensitivity of the data and the misconfiguration).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Developers: Provide clear documentation and examples for secure outbound configurations. Implement input validation for routing rules. Consider a visual configuration tool to reduce errors.
      • Users: Carefully review and test outbound configurations. Use a "least privilege" approach. Implement strict routing rules. Regularly audit outbound configurations.

Attack Surface: 4. Xray-Core Code-Level Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Exploitable bugs in the Xray-core codebase itself.
    • Xray-core Contribution: As with any software, Xray-core may contain vulnerabilities.
    • Example: A buffer overflow vulnerability in the Xray-core configuration parser allowing for remote code execution.
    • Impact: Varies widely, from denial of service to remote code execution.
    • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the vulnerability).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Developers: Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing. Use static analysis tools. Follow secure coding practices. Respond promptly to security reports.
      • Users: Keep Xray-core updated to the latest version. Monitor for security advisories.

Attack Surface: 5. DNS Resolution Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Exploitation of DNS vulnerabilities (spoofing, poisoning) to redirect Xray-core traffic.
    • Xray-core Contribution: Xray-core relies on DNS resolution to connect to outbound destinations.
    • Example: An attacker poisoning the DNS cache to redirect traffic intended for a legitimate server to a malicious server.
    • Impact: Traffic redirection, data interception, or modification.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Developers: Provide options for configuring secure DNS resolvers (DoH, DoT). Consider implementing DNSSEC validation within Xray-core.
      • Users: Use secure DNS resolvers (DoH, DoT). Configure Xray-core to use specific, trusted DNS servers. Implement DNS monitoring.