Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
57 lines (48 loc) · 5.74 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

57 lines (48 loc) · 5.74 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for eleme/mess

Attack Surface: Unencrypted Communication

  • Description: Data transmitted between mess clients and servers is sent in plain text, making it vulnerable to interception.
  • How mess Contributes: mess handles the communication; if not configured for encryption, it transmits data in the clear. This is a direct responsibility of how mess is configured and used.
  • Example: An attacker on the same network segment uses a packet sniffer (e.g., Wireshark) to capture messages containing sensitive user data or API keys.
  • Impact: Exposure of sensitive data, potential for man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks, credential theft.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Enforce TLS/SSL: Configure mess to require TLS/SSL encryption for all communication. This is likely a configuration option within mess itself or the surrounding infrastructure.
    • Certificate Management: Use valid, trusted certificates. Implement proper certificate revocation and renewal procedures.
    • Strong Ciphers: Configure mess to use only strong, up-to-date cipher suites. Disable weak or outdated ciphers.
    • Client-Side Verification: Ensure clients verify the server's certificate to prevent MITM attacks.

Attack Surface: Weak or Missing Authentication/Authorization

  • Description: Lack of proper authentication and authorization allows unauthorized clients to connect to mess and interact with the message queue.
  • How mess Contributes: mess is the component that handles client connections and message routing; its configuration determines the authentication/authorization requirements. This is a direct function of mess.
  • Example: An attacker connects to the exposed mess port and subscribes to a sensitive topic, receiving confidential data without needing any credentials. Alternatively, they could publish malicious messages.
  • Impact: Unauthorized data access, data modification, system disruption, potential for privilege escalation.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement Authentication: Require all clients to authenticate before connecting to mess. Options include:
      • API Keys: Assign unique API keys to each client.
      • Mutual TLS (mTLS): Both the client and server present certificates for authentication.
      • Integration with Identity Provider: Use an existing identity provider (e.g., OAuth 2.0, LDAP) to manage authentication.
    • Implement Authorization: Define granular access control rules. Specify which clients can publish to which topics and which clients can subscribe to which topics. Use a principle of least privilege.
    • Role-Based Access Control (RBAC): Assign roles to clients and define permissions based on roles.

Attack Surface: Denial of Service (DoS) via Message Flooding

  • Description: An attacker overwhelms the mess system with a large volume of messages, preventing legitimate messages from being processed.
  • How mess Contributes: mess is the message queue; its capacity and configuration determine its resilience to flooding. This is a direct vulnerability of the mess service.
  • Example: An attacker sends thousands of messages per second to a specific topic, causing the queue to become full and legitimate clients to be unable to publish or receive messages.
  • Impact: Service disruption, unavailability of the application.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting on message publishing, both globally and per client. Limit the number of messages a client can send within a given time period. This should be configurable within mess or through a proxy in front of it.
    • Message Size Limits: Enforce limits on the maximum size of individual messages. This should be a configuration option within mess.
    • Queue Monitoring: Monitor queue lengths and implement alerts for unusually high queue sizes or message rates.
    • Resource Allocation: Ensure sufficient resources (CPU, memory, network bandwidth) are allocated to the mess servers to handle expected and peak loads.
    • Consider a More Robust Queue: For high-volume, mission-critical applications, consider using a dedicated, highly scalable message queueing system.

Attack Surface: Vulnerabilities in mess or its Dependencies

  • Description: Security flaws in the mess library itself or its dependencies could be exploited.
  • How mess Contributes: This is a direct risk from using the library.
  • Example: A buffer overflow vulnerability in mess could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the mess server.
  • Impact: Code execution, data breach, system compromise.
  • Risk Severity: High (potentially Critical depending on the vulnerability)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Regular Updates: Keep mess and all its dependencies updated to the latest versions to receive security patches.
    • Vulnerability Scanning: Use a software composition analysis (SCA) tool or vulnerability scanner to identify known vulnerabilities in mess and its dependencies.
    • Security Monitoring: Monitor the mess project and security advisories for any reported vulnerabilities.
    • Code Review (Optional): If feasible, conduct a code review of the mess codebase, focusing on security-critical areas.