Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
90 lines (65 loc) · 6.28 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

90 lines (65 loc) · 6.28 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for fabiomsr/drawable-optimizer

Mitigation Strategy: Strict Input Validation and Sanitization (Pre-Optimization)

Description:

  1. File Extension Whitelisting: Before passing a file to drawable-optimizer, extract the file extension. Convert it to lowercase. Compare it against a hardcoded list of allowed extensions (e.g., [".png", ".jpg", ".jpeg", ".webp", ".gif"]). If the extension is not in the list, reject the file. Do not call drawable-optimizer.
  2. File Header Validation (Magic Bytes): Before passing a file to drawable-optimizer, read the first few bytes of the file. Use a library (e.g., python-magic) to determine the file type based on these "magic bytes." Compare the detected MIME type against allowed MIME types (e.g., ["image/png", "image/jpeg", "image/webp", "image/gif"]). If it doesn't match, reject the file. Do not call drawable-optimizer.
  3. File Size Limitation: Before passing a file to drawable-optimizer, get the file size. Compare it against a predefined maximum file size. If it exceeds the limit, reject the file. Do not call drawable-optimizer.
  4. Filename Sanitization: Before passing a filename to drawable-optimizer, sanitize it. Remove or replace characters that could be used for path traversal (e.g., "..", "/", ""). Use a whitelist approach (alphanumeric, underscores, hyphens, periods).

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Arbitrary File Upload (Critical): Prevents drawable-optimizer from processing non-image files, which could contain exploits.
    • Path Traversal (High): Prevents drawable-optimizer from being used to access or write files outside the intended directory.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) (Medium): Limits the impact of large files on drawable-optimizer's processing time.
    • Code Injection (Critical): Reduces the chance of exploiting vulnerabilities within drawable-optimizer itself by ensuring it only processes valid image data.

  • Impact:

    • Arbitrary File Upload: Risk reduced to near zero.
    • Path Traversal: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Denial of Service (DoS): Risk significantly reduced.
    • Code Injection: Risk significantly reduced.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • File Extension Whitelisting: Implemented in image_processor.py, function validate_image().
    • File Header Validation: Implemented in image_processor.py, function validate_image().
    • File Size Limitation: Implemented in image_processor.py, function validate_image().
    • Filename Sanitization: Implemented in utils.py, function sanitize_filename().

  • Missing Implementation:

    • None.

Mitigation Strategy: Output Validation (Post-Optimization)

Description:

  1. Re-validate Optimized Images: Immediately after drawable-optimizer completes, apply the same input validation checks (file extension, file header, file size) to the output file. This is critical because a vulnerability within drawable-optimizer could result in malicious output, even with valid input.
  2. Integrity Checks (Optional): If you have a known-good hash of the expected output, generate a hash of the optimized image and compare. This is more for detecting corruption than malicious modification.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Code Injection (Critical): Detects if drawable-optimizer itself is compromised and producing malicious output.
    • Data Corruption (Medium): Detects if the optimization process has corrupted the image.

  • Impact:

    • Code Injection: Risk significantly reduced.
    • Data Corruption: Risk reduced (primarily accidental corruption).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Re-validate Optimized Images: Not implemented.
    • Integrity Checks: Not implemented.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Re-validate Optimized Images: Implement the input validation checks on the output file after drawable-optimizer runs. Add this to image_processor.py.
    • Integrity Checks: Implement if known-good hashes are available (lower priority).

Mitigation Strategy: Avoid Unnecessary Optimization

Description:

  1. Conditional Optimization: Before calling drawable-optimizer, check if optimization is truly necessary.
    • Check if the image is already optimized (e.g., by comparing size to a previous version).
    • Check if the image is below a size threshold where optimization provides minimal benefit.
    • If optimization is not needed skip calling drawable-optimizer.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • All threats related to drawable-optimizer (Variable Severity): Reduces the frequency of using drawable-optimizer, thus reducing exposure to any of its potential vulnerabilities.

  • Impact:

    • All threats: Risk reduced proportionally to the reduction in drawable-optimizer calls.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Conditional Optimization: Not implemented.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Conditional Optimization: Implement logic to determine if optimization is needed before calling drawable-optimizer. Add this to image_processor.py.

Mitigation Strategy: Keep drawable-optimizer Updated

Description:

  • Regularly check for updates to the drawable-optimizer library itself. Apply security updates and bug fixes promptly. This is distinct from general dependency management; it focuses specifically on the library in question.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities (High): Addresses vulnerabilities that are publicly disclosed and patched in newer versions of drawable-optimizer.

  • Impact:

    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities: Risk significantly reduced by staying up-to-date.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Not consistently implemented. Updates are not checked regularly.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Establish a process for regularly checking for and applying updates to drawable-optimizer. This could involve manual checks or automated tooling.