Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
68 lines (52 loc) · 5.19 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

68 lines (52 loc) · 5.19 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for fizzed/font-mfizz

Objective: Compromise an application using font-mfizz by exploiting vulnerabilities in the font files or CSS provided by font-mfizz, leading to client-side attacks.

Attack Tree Visualization

Attack Goal: Compromise Application via Font-mfizz Exploitation [CRITICAL NODE]
├───[AND]─ Exploit Malicious Font Files [CRITICAL NODE]
│   ├───[OR]─ 1. Font Parsing Vulnerability in Browser [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   ├───[AND]─ 1.2. Deliver Malicious Font File to Application User
│   │   │   ├───[OR]─ 1.2.2. Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attack during Download [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   │   └───[OR]─ 1.2.4. Compromise Application's Asset Delivery Mechanism [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
└───[AND]─ Social Engineering [CRITICAL NODE]
    ├───[OR]─ 1. Phishing Attack Targeting Developers [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Malicious Font Files [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities within font files (TTF, WOFF, SVG) provided by font-mfizz.
  • Focus: This node is critical because it represents the core threat related to font-mfizz itself - the potential for malicious font files to be used to compromise the application.
  • Key Threat: Font Parsing Vulnerabilities in Browsers.

Attack Tree Path: Font Parsing Vulnerability in Browser [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector: Leveraging weaknesses in browser font parsing engines to execute malicious code or cause denial of service when processing crafted font files from font-mfizz.
  • Focus: This node is critical as it's the underlying vulnerability that attackers aim to exploit within the "Exploit Malicious Font Files" path.
  • Impact: Client-side code execution, Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), Denial of Service (DoS), data exfiltration.

Attack Tree Path: Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attack during Download [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: Intercepting the download of font-mfizz assets (CSS and font files) if the application uses insecure HTTP, and replacing legitimate files with malicious ones.
  • High-Risk Path: Yes, due to medium likelihood and critical impact.
  • Likelihood: Medium (if application uses HTTP for assets).
  • Impact: Critical (Code execution in browser).
  • Effort: Low (Tools readily available for MITM).
  • Skill Level: Beginner (Basic network manipulation).
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Network monitoring can detect anomalies).
  • Mitigation Priority: High. Immediately switch to HTTPS for all asset delivery.

Attack Tree Path: Compromise Application's Asset Delivery Mechanism [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: Compromising the server or CDN where the application hosts font-mfizz assets to replace legitimate font files with malicious versions.
  • High-Risk Path: Yes, due to low to medium likelihood and major impact.
  • Likelihood: Low to Medium (Depends on server/CDN security).
  • Impact: Major (Compromise of application for all users).
  • Effort: Medium to High (Server/CDN exploitation skills).
  • Skill Level: Intermediate to Advanced (Web server/CDN security knowledge).
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Security monitoring, integrity checks can detect).
  • Mitigation Priority: High. Strengthen server/CDN security, implement integrity checks for assets.

Attack Tree Path: Social Engineering [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector: Targeting developers through social engineering tactics to introduce malicious font-mfizz components into the application.
  • Focus: This node is critical because it highlights the human element as a vulnerability point, even if font-mfizz itself is secure.
  • Key Threat: Phishing Attacks Targeting Developers.

Attack Tree Path: Phishing Attack Targeting Developers [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: Tricking developers into downloading and using a compromised version of font-mfizz through phishing emails or messages impersonating legitimate sources.
  • High-Risk Path: Yes, due to medium likelihood and major impact.
  • Likelihood: Medium (Phishing is a common attack vector).
  • Impact: Major (Developer machine compromise, code injection).
  • Effort: Low (Phishing templates and tools are readily available).
  • Skill Level: Beginner (Basic social engineering skills).
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium (User awareness training, email security can help).
  • Mitigation Priority: High. Implement developer security awareness training, secure development workflows, and use trusted sources for dependencies.