Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
84 lines (65 loc) · 7.62 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

84 lines (65 loc) · 7.62 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for fizzed/font-mfizz

Mitigation Strategy: font-mfizz Specific Configuration and Usage Review

  1. Review font-mfizz API Usage: Carefully examine all code that interacts with the font-mfizz API. Identify all entry points where font data is passed to the library.

  2. Minimize Feature Usage: Use only the absolutely necessary features of font-mfizz. If you only need to extract basic font metadata, don't use features that involve more complex parsing or manipulation. The less code you use, the smaller the attack surface.

  3. Disable Unnecessary Features: If font-mfizz has configuration options to disable specific features or parsing modes, disable anything that is not strictly required. For example, if you don't need to handle hinting, see if there's a way to disable hinting-related code. (This depends on the specific API of font-mfizz and may require code inspection.)

  4. Safe API Usage: Ensure you are using the font-mfizz API in the safest way possible, according to its documentation. Look for any "safe" or "secure" variants of methods, or any recommendations for handling potentially untrusted input.

  5. Handle Exceptions: Ensure that all exceptions thrown by font-mfizz are caught and handled appropriately. Do not allow exceptions to propagate uncaught, as this could lead to unexpected behavior or denial of service. Log any exceptions with sufficient detail to aid in debugging and security analysis.

  6. Avoid Risky Operations: If font-mfizz offers any operations that are explicitly documented as being risky or potentially vulnerable (e.g., modifying font data), avoid using them unless absolutely necessary. If they are necessary, implement extra precautions (like the sandboxing and input validation described previously).

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Malicious Font File Exploitation (High Severity): By minimizing the attack surface and using the API safely, you reduce the likelihood of triggering vulnerabilities in font-mfizz or its underlying dependencies (FreeType).
      • Vulnerabilities within font-mfizz Itself (Low-Medium Severity): Directly addresses potential vulnerabilities in the library's code by limiting usage and ensuring proper error handling.
      • Denial of Service (DoS) (Medium Severity): Proper exception handling and avoiding risky operations can help prevent DoS attacks that might exploit bugs in font-mfizz.

    • Impact:

      • Malicious Font File Exploitation: Risk reduced (the degree depends on the specific features used and the quality of the font-mfizz code).
      • font-mfizz Vulnerabilities: Risk reduced.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Risk reduced.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Basic exception handling is in place for IOException during font loading.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • A comprehensive review of all font-mfizz API usage, focusing on minimizing feature usage and disabling unnecessary features, has not been performed.
      • More specific exception handling (beyond IOException) needs to be implemented to catch potential exceptions specific to font-mfizz.
      • No specific "safe" API usage patterns have been investigated or implemented.

Mitigation Strategy: Fuzz Testing of font-mfizz Integration

  1. Identify Input Points: Identify all points in your code where data is passed to font-mfizz. This is typically where you load or process font files.

  2. Create Fuzzing Harness: Write a "fuzzing harness" – a small program that uses a fuzzing library (e.g., Jazzer for Java, libFuzzer, AFL++) to generate a large number of malformed and semi-malformed font files.

  3. Integrate with font-mfizz: The fuzzing harness should pass these generated font files to the relevant font-mfizz API calls.

  4. Monitor for Crashes/Exceptions: Run the fuzzer and monitor for any crashes, uncaught exceptions, or unexpected behavior in your application or in font-mfizz itself.

  5. Analyze Results: When a crash or exception occurs, analyze the generated input file and the stack trace to identify the root cause of the vulnerability.

  6. Report and Fix: Report any vulnerabilities found to the font-mfizz maintainers (if the issue is in the library itself) and fix the issue in your own code (if the issue is in how you are using the library).

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Malicious Font File Exploitation (High Severity): Helps discover vulnerabilities in font-mfizz and its underlying dependencies (FreeType) that could be exploited by malformed font files.
      • Vulnerabilities within font-mfizz Itself (Low-Medium Severity): Directly tests the font-mfizz code for vulnerabilities.
      • Denial of Service (DoS) (Medium Severity): Can identify inputs that cause excessive resource consumption or crashes.

    • Impact:

      • Malicious Font File Exploitation: Risk reduced (depending on the effectiveness of the fuzzing and the coverage achieved).
      • font-mfizz Vulnerabilities: Risk reduced.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Risk reduced.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • None.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • A fuzzing harness needs to be created and integrated with the font-mfizz usage in the application.
      • A process for running the fuzzer, monitoring results, and analyzing crashes needs to be established.

Mitigation Strategy: Code Review of font-mfizz Integration

  1. Identify Relevant Code: Isolate the sections of your codebase that directly interact with the font-mfizz library.

  2. Security-Focused Review: Conduct a code review with a specific focus on security. Look for:

    • Proper input validation (even if limited, as described before).
    • Correct usage of the font-mfizz API.
    • Comprehensive exception handling.
    • Avoidance of risky operations.
    • Any potential logic errors that could lead to vulnerabilities.

  3. Multiple Reviewers: Have multiple developers review the code, ideally including someone with security expertise.

  4. Document Findings: Document any potential issues or areas for improvement found during the review.

  5. Remediate Issues: Address any identified issues promptly.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Malicious Font File Exploitation (High Severity): Helps identify and fix vulnerabilities in your code that could be triggered by malicious font files, even if font-mfizz itself is secure.
      • Vulnerabilities within font-mfizz Itself (Low-Medium Severity): While not directly addressing vulnerabilities in the library, it can help ensure that you are using the library in a way that minimizes the risk of triggering any existing bugs.
      • Denial of Service (DoS) (Medium Severity): Can identify potential DoS vulnerabilities in your code related to font processing.

    • Impact:

      • Malicious Font File Exploitation: Risk reduced.
      • font-mfizz Vulnerabilities: Risk indirectly reduced.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Risk reduced.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • General code reviews are conducted, but not with a specific security focus on the font-mfizz integration.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • A dedicated security-focused code review of the font-mfizz integration needs to be performed.