Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
59 lines (50 loc) · 5.49 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

59 lines (50 loc) · 5.49 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for hydraxman/hibeaver

Attack Surface: 1. WebView2/Chromium Vulnerability Exploitation

  • Description: Exploitation of vulnerabilities in the underlying WebView2 (Chromium) engine.
    • HiBeaver Contribution: HiBeaver directly relies on WebView2 for rendering and execution of web content. The application is inherently vulnerable to any security flaws in the specific WebView2 version being used. This is a direct consequence of using HiBeaver.
    • Example: A zero-day vulnerability in Chromium's JavaScript engine could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code within the WebView2 context by crafting a malicious webpage or injecting malicious JavaScript.
    • Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE) on the user's system, potentially leading to complete system compromise.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Developers:
        • Ensure the application uses the Evergreen distribution of WebView2, which automatically updates.
        • Implement a mechanism to check the WebView2 runtime version at application startup and warn/block execution if an outdated version is detected.
        • Monitor Chromium security advisories and CVEs.
      • Users:
        • Keep their operating system and any installed WebView2 runtime up-to-date.

Attack Surface: 2. Unsafe Native Function Exposure (via the Bridge)

  • Description: Exploitation of vulnerabilities in Python functions exposed to JavaScript through HiBeaver's native bridge.
    • HiBeaver Contribution: HiBeaver provides the core mechanism (the bridge) that enables JavaScript to call Python functions. The security of this interaction is entirely dependent on the developer's implementation, but the existence of the bridge and its intended purpose is a HiBeaver-specific feature.
    • Example: If a Python function exposed to JavaScript takes a filename as input and uses it in an os.system() call without sanitization, an attacker could inject shell commands (e.g., "; rm -rf /; #").
    • Impact: RCE on the host system, file system manipulation, data exfiltration, denial of service.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Developers:
        • Minimize Exposure: Expose only essential Python functions.
        • Strict Input Validation: Rigorously validate all input from JavaScript. Use type checking, length limits, whitelists, and regular expressions. Assume all JavaScript input is malicious.
        • Principle of Least Privilege: Run the Python backend with minimal privileges.
        • Avoid Dangerous Functions: Do not expose functions like os.system, eval, exec, or direct file system access without extreme caution.
        • Sandboxing (Advanced): Consider running the Python backend in a separate process or container.

Attack Surface: 3. Uncontrolled File System Access (via the Bridge)

  • Description: Unauthorized reading, writing, or deletion of files on the user's system, facilitated by the native bridge.
    • HiBeaver Contribution: While file system access itself isn't unique to HiBeaver, the primary and intended way to provide controlled file system access in a HiBeaver application is through the native bridge. This makes the bridge the central point of concern for this attack surface.
    • Example: An exposed Python function could allow JavaScript to specify an arbitrary file path for reading/writing, leading to a path traversal vulnerability.
    • Impact: Data loss, data corruption, system compromise (if system files are modified), data exfiltration.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Developers:
        • Restrict Access: Avoid granting the WebView direct file system access.
        • Controlled API: If file access is necessary, provide a highly restricted API through the native bridge. This API should:
          • Use a whitelist of allowed directories and file types.
          • Perform rigorous path sanitization and validation.
          • Enforce the principle of least privilege.
        • User Confirmation: Require explicit user confirmation for sensitive file operations.

Attack Surface: 4. Devtools Enabled in Production

  • Description: Leaving developer tools enabled in a production build allows attackers to inspect and modify the application's code and data.
    • HiBeaver Contribution: HiBeaver, by using WebView2, inherently includes the possibility of enabling devtools. The developer must actively disable this.
    • Example: An attacker could open devtools, inspect network requests, modify JavaScript code, or access data stored in the WebView.
    • Impact: Code analysis, data exfiltration, potential for code modification and exploitation.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Developers:
        • Disable Devtools: Ensure that devtools are explicitly disabled in production builds of the application. This is typically a configuration option within the HiBeaver setup or WebView2 settings.