Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
264 lines (205 loc) · 15.3 KB

File metadata and controls

264 lines (205 loc) · 15.3 KB

Okay, let's create a design document for the Artifactory User Plugins project.

BUSINESS POSTURE

Business Priorities and Goals:

  • Enhance Extensibility: Allow users to customize and extend JFrog Artifactory's functionality without modifying the core application. This enables tailored workflows and integrations specific to an organization's needs.
  • Improve Operational Efficiency: Enable automation of tasks within Artifactory, reducing manual intervention and potential errors.
  • Maintain Core Stability: Provide a safe and controlled way to add functionality, ensuring that user-provided code does not compromise the stability or security of the main Artifactory instance.
  • Foster Community Contributions: Encourage a community around Artifactory where users can share and reuse plugins, accelerating innovation and problem-solving.
  • Reduce Vendor Lock-in: By allowing custom integrations, users can more easily connect Artifactory with other tools in their ecosystem, reducing reliance on a single vendor's solutions.

Most Important Business Risks:

  • Security Vulnerabilities in Plugins: User-developed plugins could introduce security vulnerabilities, potentially exposing sensitive data or compromising the Artifactory instance.
  • Performance Degradation: Poorly written plugins could negatively impact Artifactory's performance, leading to slowdowns or instability.
  • Maintenance Overhead: Managing a large number of plugins, especially those developed by third parties, could create a significant maintenance burden.
  • Compatibility Issues: Plugins might become incompatible with newer versions of Artifactory, requiring updates and potentially causing disruptions.
  • Lack of Support: Community-developed plugins might lack proper support, leaving users with unresolved issues.

SECURITY POSTURE

Existing Security Controls:

  • security control: Plugin Isolation: Artifactory executes user plugins in a sandboxed environment (Groovy sandbox) to limit their access to the core system and prevent malicious or accidental damage. Described in repository README.md.
  • security control: Permission Control: Artifactory provides a mechanism to control which users and groups can deploy, execute, and manage plugins. Described in repository README.md.
  • security control: API for Auditing: Artifactory likely provides APIs or logging mechanisms to track plugin activity, aiding in auditing and incident response. (Assumption, needs verification).
  • security control: Code Review (Optional): Organizations can implement a code review process for internally developed plugins before deployment. This is a procedural control, not a technical one inherent to the project.

Accepted Risks:

  • accepted risk: Third-Party Plugin Risk: Users deploying plugins from untrusted sources accept the risk of potential vulnerabilities or malicious code within those plugins.
  • accepted risk: Plugin-Induced Instability: While the sandbox aims to mitigate this, there's an accepted risk that a poorly written plugin could still cause performance issues or instability in specific scenarios.

Recommended Security Controls:

  • security control: Static Code Analysis: Integrate static code analysis tools into the plugin development and deployment workflow to automatically scan for common vulnerabilities and coding errors.
  • security control: Dynamic Analysis: Consider implementing dynamic analysis (runtime testing) of plugins in a staging environment to identify potential security or performance issues before production deployment.
  • security control: Plugin Signing: Implement a mechanism to digitally sign plugins, allowing Artifactory to verify the authenticity and integrity of plugins before execution.
  • security control: Dependency Scanning: Scan plugin dependencies for known vulnerabilities.
  • security control: Content Trust: Enforce content trust to ensure that only signed and verified plugins can be executed.

Security Requirements:

  • Authentication:

    • Plugins should leverage Artifactory's existing authentication mechanisms. Plugins should not implement their own authentication.
    • If a plugin interacts with external systems, it should use secure credential storage mechanisms (e.g., Artifactory's encrypted properties or a dedicated secrets management solution).
  • Authorization:

    • Plugins should respect Artifactory's existing permission model.
    • Plugins should implement granular authorization checks if they introduce new actions or resources. Use the provided APIs to check user permissions.
  • Input Validation:

    • Plugins must thoroughly validate all inputs received from users, other plugins, or external systems.
    • Use whitelisting (allowlisting) rather than blacklisting (denylisting) whenever possible.
    • Sanitize inputs to prevent injection attacks (e.g., cross-site scripting, SQL injection).
  • Cryptography:

    • Plugins should use Artifactory's provided cryptographic libraries and APIs for any encryption, hashing, or digital signature needs.
    • Avoid implementing custom cryptographic algorithms.
    • Use secure random number generators.
    • Store sensitive keys securely.

DESIGN

C4 CONTEXT

graph LR
    subgraph "Artifactory Ecosystem"
    A[User] --> B(Artifactory User Plugins);
    B --> C(JFrog Artifactory);
    C --> D(External Systems);
    end
Loading

Element Descriptions:

  • Element:

    • Name: User
    • Type: Person
    • Description: A user of JFrog Artifactory who interacts with the system and may utilize user plugins.
    • Responsibilities: Interacting with Artifactory, deploying plugins, configuring plugins, triggering plugin actions.
    • Security Controls: Authentication and authorization within Artifactory.
  • Element:

    • Name: Artifactory User Plugins
    • Type: Software System
    • Description: The collection of user-developed plugins that extend Artifactory's functionality.
    • Responsibilities: Executing custom logic, interacting with Artifactory APIs, interacting with external systems (if necessary).
    • Security Controls: Plugin isolation (sandboxing), permission control, input validation, secure coding practices.
  • Element:

    • Name: JFrog Artifactory
    • Type: Software System
    • Description: The core JFrog Artifactory binary repository manager.
    • Responsibilities: Managing artifacts, providing access control, exposing APIs for plugin interaction.
    • Security Controls: Artifactory's built-in security features, including authentication, authorization, access control, and auditing.
  • Element:

    • Name: External Systems
    • Type: Software System
    • Description: Any external systems that plugins might interact with, such as build servers, notification services, or other applications.
    • Responsibilities: Varies depending on the specific external system.
    • Security Controls: Depend on the external system; plugins should use secure communication protocols and authentication mechanisms when interacting with them.

C4 CONTAINER

graph LR
    subgraph "Artifactory User Plugins"
        A[Plugin 1] --> B(Artifactory API);
        C[Plugin 2] --> B;
        D[Plugin 3] --> B;
        B --> E(Artifactory Core);
    end
Loading

Element Descriptions:

  • Element:

    • Name: Plugin 1, Plugin 2, Plugin 3
    • Type: Container (Groovy Script)
    • Description: Individual user-developed plugins. Each plugin is a separate Groovy script.
    • Responsibilities: Implementing specific custom logic, interacting with the Artifactory API.
    • Security Controls: Input validation, secure coding practices, adherence to Artifactory's security model.
  • Element:

    • Name: Artifactory API
    • Type: API
    • Description: The set of APIs provided by Artifactory for plugins to interact with the core system.
    • Responsibilities: Providing access to Artifactory's functionality, enforcing security controls.
    • Security Controls: Authentication, authorization, input validation.
  • Element:

    • Name: Artifactory Core
    • Type: Container
    • Description: The core functionality of JFrog Artifactory.
    • Responsibilities: Managing artifacts, users, permissions, etc.
    • Security Controls: Artifactory's built-in security features.

DEPLOYMENT

Possible Deployment Solutions:

  1. Manual Deployment via Web UI: Users manually upload plugin scripts through the Artifactory web interface.
  2. Automated Deployment via REST API: Plugins are deployed using Artifactory's REST API, often as part of a CI/CD pipeline.
  3. Configuration Management Tools: Tools like Ansible, Chef, or Puppet can be used to manage plugin deployments.

Chosen Solution (for detailed description): Automated Deployment via REST API

graph LR
    A[CI/CD Server] --> B(Artifactory REST API);
    B --> C(Artifactory Server);
    C --> D{Plugin Directory};
Loading

Element Descriptions:

  • Element:

    • Name: CI/CD Server
    • Type: Server
    • Description: A server running a CI/CD system (e.g., Jenkins, GitLab CI, GitHub Actions).
    • Responsibilities: Building, testing, and deploying plugins.
    • Security Controls: Access controls, secure credential management, secure communication with Artifactory.
  • Element:

    • Name: Artifactory REST API
    • Type: API
    • Description: The REST API endpoint for deploying plugins to Artifactory.
    • Responsibilities: Receiving plugin deployment requests, validating credentials, storing plugins.
    • Security Controls: Authentication, authorization, input validation, TLS encryption.
  • Element:

    • Name: Artifactory Server
    • Type: Server
    • Description: The server hosting the JFrog Artifactory instance.
    • Responsibilities: Running Artifactory, managing plugins, serving artifacts.
    • Security Controls: Server hardening, network security, Artifactory's built-in security features.
  • Element:

    • Name: Plugin Directory
    • Type: File System Directory
    • Description: The directory on the Artifactory server where plugin scripts are stored.
    • Responsibilities: Storing plugin files.
    • Security Controls: File system permissions, access control lists.

BUILD

graph LR
    A[Developer Workstation] --> B{Git Repository};
    B --> C[CI/CD Server];
    C --> D[SAST Scanner];
    C --> E[Dependency Scanner];
    C --> F[Artifactory REST API];
    F --> G{Artifactory Server};
Loading

Build Process Description:

  1. Developer: Developers write plugin code (Groovy scripts) and commit it to a Git repository.
  2. Git Repository: The source code for the plugins is stored in a version-controlled Git repository.
  3. CI/CD Server: A CI/CD server (e.g., Jenkins, GitLab CI) monitors the Git repository for changes. When a change is detected, it triggers a build pipeline.
  4. SAST Scanner: The build pipeline includes a static application security testing (SAST) step. A SAST tool (e.g., SonarQube, Fortify) scans the plugin code for potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Dependency Scanner: The build pipeline includes a dependency scanning step. A tool like JFrog Xray or Snyk scans the plugin's dependencies (if any) for known vulnerabilities.
  6. Artifactory REST API: If the SAST and dependency scans pass, the CI/CD server uses the Artifactory REST API to deploy the plugin to the Artifactory server.
  7. Artifactory Server: The Artifactory server receives the plugin and stores it in the designated plugin directory.

Security Controls:

  • security control: Source Code Management: Using a Git repository provides version control, audit trails, and access control for plugin code.
  • security control: CI/CD Pipeline: Automating the build and deployment process ensures consistency and reduces the risk of manual errors.
  • security control: SAST Scanning: Static code analysis helps identify vulnerabilities early in the development lifecycle.
  • security control: Dependency Scanning: Scanning dependencies helps prevent the use of vulnerable libraries.
  • security control: Secure Credentials: The CI/CD server should use secure credential management to store and access the Artifactory API credentials.
  • security control: Least Privilege: The CI/CD server should have only the necessary permissions to deploy plugins to Artifactory.

RISK ASSESSMENT

Critical Business Processes:

  • Artifact Management: The core process of storing, retrieving, and managing software artifacts.
  • Build and Release Pipeline: The process of building and releasing software, which relies on Artifactory for artifact storage and dependency management.
  • Software Delivery: The overall process of delivering software to end-users, which depends on the availability and reliability of Artifactory.

Data to Protect:

  • Software Artifacts: These are the primary data stored in Artifactory. Their sensitivity varies greatly depending on the nature of the artifacts. They can range from public open-source libraries (low sensitivity) to proprietary source code and compiled binaries (high sensitivity).
  • Metadata: Artifactory stores metadata about artifacts, including version information, dependencies, and build details. This metadata can be sensitive, especially if it reveals information about internal development processes or vulnerabilities.
  • User Credentials: Artifactory stores user credentials and access tokens. These are highly sensitive and must be protected from unauthorized access.
  • Configuration Data: Artifactory's configuration data, including settings related to security, access control, and integrations, is sensitive and must be protected.
  • Logs: Artifactory's logs may contain sensitive information, such as user activity, IP addresses, and error messages that could reveal vulnerabilities.

Data Sensitivity Levels:

  • High: Proprietary source code, compiled binaries, user credentials, access tokens, sensitive configuration data.
  • Medium: Metadata about internal projects, build details, internal documentation.
  • Low: Publicly available open-source libraries, publicly available documentation.

QUESTIONS & ASSUMPTIONS

Questions:

  • What specific APIs are available for plugins to interact with Artifactory? A detailed API documentation reference is needed.
  • What are the exact limitations of the Groovy sandbox environment? What system resources are restricted?
  • What logging and auditing capabilities are available for plugin activity?
  • Are there any existing performance benchmarks for Artifactory plugins?
  • What is the recommended approach for handling errors and exceptions within plugins?
  • What is the process for updating or undeploying plugins?
  • What is the versioning strategy for plugins?

Assumptions:

  • Assumption: Artifactory provides a robust API for plugins to interact with its core functionality.
  • Assumption: The Groovy sandbox effectively isolates plugins and prevents them from accessing sensitive system resources.
  • Assumption: Artifactory provides adequate logging and auditing capabilities to track plugin activity.
  • Assumption: Developers writing plugins have a basic understanding of security best practices.
  • Assumption: Artifactory's REST API is secured with authentication and authorization.
  • Assumption: The CI/CD server used for plugin deployment is securely configured.
  • Assumption: The Artifactory server is properly hardened and secured.
  • Assumption: Plugin developers will follow secure coding practices.
  • Assumption: Artifactory handles plugin concurrency.