Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
41 lines (34 loc) · 7.43 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

41 lines (34 loc) · 7.43 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for kezong/fat-aar-android

Attack Surface: Vulnerable Transitive Dependencies

  • Description: Inclusion of vulnerable libraries that are not directly used by the application's core code but are brought in as dependencies of the AAR libraries bundled by fat-aar-android.
  • fat-aar-android Contribution: The plugin bundles all transitive dependencies from the included AARs into a single application AAR. This process increases the likelihood of inadvertently including vulnerable transitive dependencies that might not have been intended for inclusion or properly vetted for security.
  • Example: An AAR library being bundled depends on an older, vulnerable version of a common logging library. fat-aar-android includes this vulnerable logging library in the final application AAR, even if the main application code doesn't directly use this specific logging library. This exposes the application to potential exploits targeting the known vulnerabilities in the bundled logging library.
  • Impact: Successful exploitation of vulnerabilities in bundled transitive dependencies can lead to critical impacts such as remote code execution, unauthorized data access, data breaches, and complete system compromise.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Pre-Bundling Dependency Analysis: Before using fat-aar-android, meticulously analyze the dependency tree of each AAR library intended for bundling. Utilize dependency scanning tools to identify known vulnerabilities in transitive dependencies before they are included in the fat-AAR.
    • Selective Dependency Exclusion: Leverage Gradle's dependency exclusion mechanisms to explicitly exclude known vulnerable transitive dependencies during the fat-aar-android build process. Carefully review the impact of exclusions to ensure core functionality is not broken.
    • Dependency Version Management: Proactively manage and update dependencies of the AAR libraries being bundled. Encourage AAR library providers to use the latest secure versions of their dependencies.
    • Post-Bundling Vulnerability Scanning: After creating the fat-AAR, perform thorough vulnerability scans on the resulting AAR file. This acts as a final check to identify any remaining vulnerabilities introduced through bundled dependencies.

Attack Surface: Dependency Version Conflicts Leading to Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Conflicts arising from different AAR libraries depending on incompatible or different versions of the same underlying library. Inconsistent dependency versions can lead to unpredictable application behavior and potentially introduce or expose vulnerabilities if an older, less secure version is inadvertently prioritized or used at runtime.
  • fat-aar-android Contribution: fat-aar-android merges dependencies from multiple AARs. If these AARs declare dependencies on different versions of the same library, the plugin's merging process might not always resolve these conflicts in a secure or predictable manner. This can result in the application using a vulnerable older version of a library if the conflict resolution is not carefully managed.
  • Example: AAR library "X" depends on security-lib:1.0 which has a known vulnerability. AAR library "Y" depends on security-lib:2.0 which patches this vulnerability. If fat-aar-android bundles both and due to classpath or merging issues, version 1.0 is loaded or used by the application, the vulnerability is effectively reintroduced into the application through the fat-AAR process.
  • Impact: Exploitation of vulnerabilities due to the application unexpectedly using a vulnerable, older version of a library caused by dependency version conflicts introduced by the fat-AAR bundling process. This can lead to high severity impacts depending on the nature of the vulnerability.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Pre-Bundling Dependency Reconciliation and Standardization: Before using fat-aar-android, meticulously reconcile dependency versions across all AAR libraries intended for bundling. Aim to standardize on consistent and secure versions of shared libraries across all bundled AARs.
    • Explicit Dependency Declaration in Main Application: In the main application's build.gradle file, explicitly declare dependencies on libraries that are also likely to be bundled within AARs. This provides more control over version selection and can help prevent unexpected version conflicts and shadowing.
    • Thorough Integration Testing: After creating the fat-AAR, conduct rigorous integration testing, specifically focusing on areas of the application that utilize functionalities from bundled AARs and their dependencies. Monitor for any unexpected behavior or errors that might indicate dependency version conflicts.
    • Dependency Conflict Resolution Strategies (Gradle): Utilize Gradle's dependency resolution strategies (e.g., failOnVersionConflict(), force()) in conjunction with fat-aar-android to proactively detect and manage dependency version conflicts during the build process.

Attack Surface: Vulnerabilities in the fat-aar-android Plugin Itself

  • Description: The fat-aar-android Gradle plugin, being a software component itself, could potentially contain security vulnerabilities in its code.
  • fat-aar-android Contribution: Using the fat-aar-android plugin introduces a direct dependency on its code execution during the application build process. If vulnerabilities exist within the plugin, they could be exploited during the build, potentially compromising the integrity of the generated application AAR or the build environment itself.
  • Example: A vulnerability in the plugin's AAR merging logic could be exploited by a malicious actor to inject malicious code or modify the contents of the final application AAR during the build process. This could lead to the distribution of a compromised application.
  • Impact: Compromised build process, potential injection of malicious code into the application, supply chain attacks, and potential compromise of the development/build environment.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Plugin Version Updates and Monitoring: Keep the fat-aar-android plugin updated to the latest version. Regularly monitor the plugin's repository and security advisories for reported vulnerabilities and apply updates promptly.
    • Plugin Source Code Review (Advanced): For highly sensitive projects, consider performing a security review or audit of the fat-aar-android plugin's source code to identify potential vulnerabilities before deploying it in the build pipeline.
    • Trusted Plugin Sources: Download and use the fat-aar-android plugin only from trusted and official sources, such as the official GitHub repository (https://github.com/kezong/fat-aar-android). Verify the integrity of the plugin distribution (e.g., using checksums if available).
    • Secure Build Environment: Implement robust security measures for the build environment to prevent unauthorized access and modifications. This includes access controls, monitoring, and regular security assessments of the build infrastructure.