Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
212 lines (168 loc) · 21.6 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

212 lines (168 loc) · 21.6 KB

Okay, here's the deep security analysis of Netflix Asgard, based on the provided security design review and the GitHub repository:

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of Asgard's key components, identify potential vulnerabilities and weaknesses, and provide actionable mitigation strategies. The analysis will focus on inferring the architecture, data flow, and security controls from the codebase, documentation, and the provided design review. The primary goal is to identify risks that could lead to unauthorized access, data breaches, service disruption, or other security incidents.

  • Scope: The analysis will cover the following key components of Asgard:

    • Web Application (Groovy/Grails)
    • AWS SDK Integration
    • Data Store (Database)
    • Build Process (Gradle)
    • Deployment Model (EC2-based, as inferred)
    • Authentication and Authorization Mechanisms
    • Dependency Management

    The analysis will not cover:

    • The security of the underlying AWS infrastructure (this is assumed to be handled by AWS and Netflix's general AWS security practices).
    • The security of "Other Netflix Systems" that Asgard might integrate with (this is outside the scope of this specific analysis).
    • Physical security of data centers.

  • Methodology:

    1. Code Review: Examine the Asgard codebase (Groovy, Grails, JavaScript) on GitHub to identify potential vulnerabilities, insecure coding practices, and security-related configurations.
    2. Design Review: Analyze the provided security design review document, including the C4 diagrams and deployment model, to understand the system architecture and data flow.
    3. Dependency Analysis: Investigate the project's dependencies (declared in build.gradle and other configuration files) to identify known vulnerabilities and potential supply chain risks.
    4. Threat Modeling: Identify potential threats and attack vectors based on the system's architecture, functionality, and data sensitivity.
    5. Best Practices Review: Compare Asgard's design and implementation against industry best practices for secure web application development and AWS security.
    6. Mitigation Recommendations: Provide specific, actionable recommendations to address the identified vulnerabilities and weaknesses.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

  • 2.1 Web Application (Groovy/Grails)

    • Inferred Architecture: Asgard is a web application built using the Groovy/Grails framework. This implies a Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture, with Groovy Server Pages (GSP) for the view layer, Groovy classes for controllers and models, and likely Grails' Object-Relational Mapping (GORM) for database interaction.
    • Security Implications:
      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): GSPs are vulnerable to XSS if user-supplied data is not properly encoded or escaped before being displayed. The review mentions input validation, but output encoding is equally crucial.
      • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF): Grails provides built-in CSRF protection, but it must be properly configured and enabled. If disabled or misconfigured, attackers could trick users into performing unintended actions.
      • SQL Injection: If Asgard uses direct SQL queries (rather than GORM), it could be vulnerable to SQL injection. Even with GORM, improper use of dynamic queries can introduce vulnerabilities.
      • Command Injection: If Asgard executes shell commands based on user input, it could be vulnerable to command injection.
      • Session Management: Asgard must securely manage user sessions, including generating strong session IDs, protecting against session fixation, and handling session timeouts properly.
      • Authentication Bypass: Flaws in the authentication logic could allow attackers to bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access.
      • Authorization Bypass: Incorrectly implemented authorization checks could allow users to access resources or perform actions beyond their privileges.
      • Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR): If Asgard uses predictable identifiers for objects (e.g., sequential IDs), attackers might be able to access unauthorized data by manipulating these identifiers.
      • Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards: If Asgard redirects users to URLs based on user input, it could be vulnerable to open redirect attacks.
      • Error Handling: Improper error handling can reveal sensitive information about the system's internal workings, aiding attackers.

  • 2.2 AWS SDK Integration

    • Inferred Architecture: Asgard uses the AWS SDK (likely the Java SDK) to interact with various AWS services (EC2, S3, Auto Scaling, IAM, etc.). This interaction is crucial for Asgard's core functionality.
    • Security Implications:
      • Credential Management: The most critical security concern. Asgard must securely manage AWS credentials. Hardcoding credentials in the codebase is a major vulnerability. Using instance profiles (IAM roles for EC2 instances) is the recommended approach. The design review mentions a secrets management solution, but the specifics are unknown.
      • Least Privilege: The AWS credentials used by Asgard should have the minimum necessary permissions to perform its tasks. Overly permissive credentials increase the impact of a potential compromise.
      • API Call Validation: Asgard should validate the responses from AWS API calls to ensure they are not tampered with.
      • Rate Limiting: Asgard should implement rate limiting for AWS API calls to prevent abuse and potential denial-of-service attacks.
      • Encryption: Communication between Asgard and AWS services should be encrypted using HTTPS (this is generally handled by the AWS SDK).

  • 2.3 Data Store (Database)

    • Inferred Architecture: Asgard uses a database (likely RDS or SimpleDB, as mentioned in the design review) to store configuration data, deployment history, and other persistent information.
    • Security Implications:
      • Database Authentication: Asgard must authenticate to the database securely. Hardcoded credentials are a major vulnerability. Using IAM database authentication (if supported by the database type) is a good practice.
      • Access Control: Database user accounts should have the minimum necessary privileges. The principle of least privilege applies here as well.
      • SQL Injection: (See 2.1) - This is a major concern for any database interaction.
      • Data Encryption: Sensitive data stored in the database should be encrypted at rest. This might involve using AWS KMS or database-level encryption features.
      • Backups: Regular backups of the database are essential for disaster recovery. Backups should be encrypted and stored securely.
      • Network Security: The database should be located in a private subnet and protected by security groups, allowing access only from the Asgard application instances.

  • 2.4 Build Process (Gradle)

    • Inferred Architecture: Asgard uses Gradle for dependency management and building the application. The design review recommends SAST and SCA.
    • Security Implications:
      • Dependency Vulnerabilities: The primary security concern. Asgard's dependencies (libraries, frameworks) may contain known vulnerabilities. Using SCA tools (OWASP Dependency-Check, Snyk) is crucial to identify and mitigate these risks. The review mentions this as a "recommended" control, but it should be considered mandatory.
      • Build Server Security: The build server (Jenkins, GitHub Actions, etc.) should be secured and regularly updated. Compromise of the build server could allow attackers to inject malicious code into the Asgard build.
      • Artifact Integrity: The generated WAR file should be protected from tampering. Code signing can help ensure the integrity and authenticity of the artifact.

  • 2.5 Deployment Model (EC2-based)

    • Inferred Architecture: The design review describes an EC2-based deployment model, with an Auto Scaling Group, Elastic Load Balancer, and RDS database.
    • Security Implications:
      • EC2 Instance Security: The EC2 instances running Asgard should be hardened and regularly patched. This includes using a secure AMI, configuring security groups, and disabling unnecessary services.
      • Security Groups: Security groups should be configured to allow only the necessary traffic to and from the Asgard instances and the database. The principle of least privilege applies here.
      • Network ACLs: Network ACLs can provide an additional layer of network security at the subnet level.
      • IAM Roles: EC2 instances should use IAM roles to access AWS services, rather than storing credentials directly on the instances.
      • Load Balancer Security: The Elastic Load Balancer should be configured to use HTTPS and terminate SSL/TLS connections securely.
      • VPC Security: Asgard should be deployed within a VPC to provide network isolation.

  • 2.6 Authentication and Authorization Mechanisms

    • Inferred Architecture: The design review states that Asgard likely uses AWS IAM for authentication and implements role-based access control (RBAC).
    • Security Implications:
      • IAM Integration: Proper integration with AWS IAM is crucial. Asgard should leverage IAM roles and policies to manage user permissions.
      • RBAC Implementation: The RBAC implementation should be carefully designed and tested to ensure that users can only access the resources and perform the actions they are authorized to.
      • MFA: Multi-factor authentication (MFA) should be enforced for all Asgard users, adding an extra layer of security.
      • Session Management: (See 2.1) - Secure session management is essential for protecting authenticated users.

  • 2.7 Dependency Management

    • Inferred Architecture: Asgard uses Gradle to manage dependencies.
    • Security Implications:
      • Vulnerable Dependencies: Asgard is vulnerable to the vulnerabilities of its dependencies. Regular scanning and updates are crucial.
      • Dependency Confusion: Attackers may publish malicious packages with names similar to legitimate dependencies. Asgard's build configuration should be reviewed to ensure it's not vulnerable to this type of attack.
      • Transitive Dependencies: Asgard is also vulnerable to the vulnerabilities of its transitive dependencies (dependencies of dependencies). SCA tools should analyze the entire dependency tree.

3. Threat Modeling

Here are some potential threats and attack vectors, categorized by the STRIDE model:

  • Spoofing:

    • An attacker could impersonate a legitimate Asgard user by stealing their credentials or session token.
    • An attacker could spoof AWS API responses to manipulate Asgard's behavior.

  • Tampering:

    • An attacker could modify the Asgard WAR file to inject malicious code.
    • An attacker could tamper with data stored in the Asgard database.
    • An attacker could modify the configuration of Asgard or its underlying infrastructure (e.g., security groups, IAM policies).

  • Repudiation:

    • An attacker could perform malicious actions within Asgard, and there might be insufficient logging or auditing to trace their actions.

  • Information Disclosure:

    • An attacker could exploit vulnerabilities (e.g., XSS, SQL injection, IDOR) to access sensitive data, such as AWS credentials, deployment configurations, or user information.
    • Asgard's error messages or logs could reveal sensitive information about the system.

  • Denial of Service:

    • An attacker could flood Asgard with requests, overwhelming the server and making it unavailable to legitimate users.
    • An attacker could exploit vulnerabilities to crash the Asgard application or its underlying infrastructure.
    • An attacker could consume excessive AWS resources, leading to high costs or service disruptions.

  • Elevation of Privilege:

    • An attacker could exploit vulnerabilities in Asgard's authorization logic to gain access to resources or perform actions beyond their privileges.
    • An attacker could exploit vulnerabilities in the underlying operating system or AWS infrastructure to gain elevated privileges.

4. Mitigation Strategies

Here are specific, actionable mitigation strategies tailored to Asgard, addressing the identified threats and vulnerabilities:

  • 4.1 Web Application Security:

    • Input Validation and Output Encoding: Implement strict input validation for all user-supplied data, using a whitelist approach whenever possible. Implement context-aware output encoding to prevent XSS. For example, use appropriate encoding functions for HTML, JavaScript, CSS, and URL contexts. Grails provides built-in encoding functions (e.g., <g:encodeAs>, <g:javascriptEncode>).
    • CSRF Protection: Ensure that Grails' built-in CSRF protection is enabled and properly configured. Verify that all state-changing requests (e.g., POST, PUT, DELETE) include a valid CSRF token.
    • SQL Injection Prevention: Use Grails' GORM for database interaction, and avoid using raw SQL queries. If raw SQL is absolutely necessary, use parameterized queries or prepared statements. Never concatenate user input directly into SQL queries.
    • Command Injection Prevention: Avoid executing shell commands based on user input. If necessary, use a safe API that does not involve shell interpretation. Sanitize and validate any user input that is passed to external commands.
    • Secure Session Management: Use Grails' built-in session management features, and ensure that:
      • Session IDs are generated using a cryptographically secure random number generator.
      • Session cookies are marked as HttpOnly and Secure.
      • Session timeouts are configured appropriately.
      • Session fixation is prevented (e.g., by regenerating the session ID after authentication).
    • Authentication and Authorization:
      • Integrate with AWS IAM for authentication.
      • Enforce MFA for all Asgard users.
      • Implement fine-grained RBAC using IAM roles and policies.
      • Regularly review and audit user permissions.
      • Follow the principle of least privilege.
    • IDOR Prevention: Avoid using predictable identifiers for objects. Use UUIDs or other cryptographically secure random identifiers. Implement access control checks to ensure that users can only access objects they are authorized to.
    • Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards Prevention: Avoid redirecting users to URLs based on user input. If necessary, validate the target URL against a whitelist of allowed URLs.
    • Secure Error Handling: Implement a custom error handler that displays generic error messages to users and logs detailed error information for debugging purposes. Never expose sensitive information (e.g., stack traces, database queries) in error messages.

  • 4.2 AWS SDK Security:

    • Credential Management: Never hardcode AWS credentials in the codebase. Use IAM roles for EC2 instances (instance profiles). If Asgard needs to access resources outside the EC2 instance's IAM role, use a dedicated secrets management solution (e.g., AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault) to securely store and retrieve credentials.
    • Least Privilege: Create IAM roles with the minimum necessary permissions for Asgard to function. Use managed policies or create custom policies with fine-grained permissions. Regularly review and audit IAM roles and policies.
    • API Call Validation: Validate the responses from AWS API calls to ensure they are not tampered with. Check for error codes and unexpected values.
    • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting for AWS API calls to prevent abuse and potential denial-of-service attacks. Use AWS SDK features or custom logic to implement rate limiting.
    • Encryption: Ensure that communication between Asgard and AWS services is encrypted using HTTPS (this is generally handled by the AWS SDK).

  • 4.3 Database Security:

    • Database Authentication: Use IAM database authentication (if supported by the database type) or a secrets management solution to securely store and retrieve database credentials. Never hardcode credentials.
    • Access Control: Create database user accounts with the minimum necessary privileges. Use separate accounts for different tasks (e.g., read-only, read-write).
    • SQL Injection Prevention: (See 4.1)
    • Data Encryption: Enable encryption at rest for the database. Use AWS KMS or database-level encryption features.
    • Backups: Configure automated backups for the database. Encrypt backups and store them securely. Regularly test the backup and restore process.
    • Network Security: Place the database in a private subnet and restrict access using security groups. Allow access only from the Asgard application instances.

  • 4.4 Build Process Security:

    • Dependency Management: Integrate a Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tool (e.g., OWASP Dependency-Check, Snyk, Retire.js) into the Gradle build process. Configure the tool to fail the build if vulnerabilities with a defined severity threshold are found. Regularly update dependencies to address known vulnerabilities.
    • SAST: Integrate a Static Application Security Testing (SAST) tool (e.g., FindBugs, SpotBugs, SonarQube) into the Gradle build process. Configure the tool to fail the build if vulnerabilities with a defined severity threshold are found.
    • Build Server Security: Secure the build server (Jenkins, GitHub Actions, etc.) by:
      • Limiting access to authorized users.
      • Regularly applying security updates.
      • Using strong passwords and MFA.
      • Monitoring the build server for suspicious activity.
    • Artifact Integrity: Consider signing the WAR file using a code signing certificate. This helps ensure that the artifact has not been tampered with during transit or storage.

  • 4.5 Deployment Security:

    • EC2 Instance Security:
      • Use a secure, hardened AMI (e.g., a CIS benchmarked AMI).
      • Regularly apply security updates to the operating system and installed software.
      • Configure security groups to allow only the necessary traffic.
      • Disable unnecessary services and ports.
      • Use a host-based intrusion detection system (HIDS).
      • Enable logging and monitoring.
    • Security Groups: Configure security groups to allow only the necessary traffic to and from the Asgard instances and the database. Use specific ports and protocols, and restrict source IP addresses whenever possible.
    • Network ACLs: Use network ACLs to provide an additional layer of network security at the subnet level.
    • IAM Roles: Use IAM roles for EC2 instances to access AWS services. Avoid storing credentials directly on the instances.
    • Load Balancer Security: Configure the Elastic Load Balancer to use HTTPS and terminate SSL/TLS connections securely. Use a strong cipher suite and a valid SSL certificate.
    • VPC Security: Deploy Asgard within a VPC to provide network isolation. Use separate subnets for the web tier, application tier, and database tier.

  • 4.6 General Security Recommendations:

    • Regular Security Assessments: Conduct regular security assessments, including penetration testing and vulnerability scanning, to identify and address potential weaknesses.
    • Security Training: Provide security training to developers and operators to raise awareness of security best practices and common vulnerabilities.
    • Incident Response Plan: Develop and maintain an incident response plan to handle security incidents effectively.
    • Logging and Monitoring: Implement comprehensive logging and monitoring to detect and respond to suspicious activity. Integrate with AWS CloudTrail, CloudWatch, and other monitoring tools.
    • Disaster Recovery Plan: Develop and maintain disaster recovery plan.
    • WAF: Deploy Web Application Firewall, to protect from common attacks.
    • Keep project up to date: Since project is not actively maintained, it is good to check if there is any maintained fork, or consider alternatives.

5. Conclusion

Asgard, as a tool for managing AWS deployments, has significant security implications. A compromise of Asgard could grant attackers control over critical AWS resources, leading to severe consequences. The analysis above highlights several key areas of concern, including credential management, dependency vulnerabilities, web application security, and database security. The provided mitigation strategies offer a comprehensive approach to securing Asgard and reducing the risk of a security incident. It's crucial to prioritize these recommendations based on the specific risks and the organization's security posture. Regular security assessments, ongoing monitoring, and a proactive approach to vulnerability management are essential for maintaining the security of Asgard and the AWS resources it manages. The most important recommendation is to implement robust secrets management and integrate SAST and SCA tools into build process.