Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
161 lines (130 loc) · 12.1 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

161 lines (130 loc) · 12.1 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for nextflow-io/nextflow

Mitigation Strategy: 1. Workflow Code Review and Provenance (Nextflow DSL)

  • Description:

    1. Establish a mandatory code review process specifically for all Nextflow DSL code (both DSL1 and DSL2). This includes the main workflow file (main.nf or similar), any included modules (modules.nf), and any scripts called by process blocks.
    2. Require at least two developers familiar with Nextflow and security best practices to review and approve any changes before merging to the main branch.
    3. The review should focus on:
      • Understanding the exact functionality of each process block, including all commands executed within the process.
      • Identifying potential command injection vulnerabilities within process scripts (e.g., improper handling of user-supplied parameters).
      • Verifying that external scripts called by process blocks are from trusted sources and have been reviewed.
      • Checking for any insecure use of Nextflow directives (e.g., publishDir with overly permissive settings).
      • Ensuring that the workflow adheres to established Nextflow coding standards and security guidelines.
    4. Maintain a complete history of all code changes using Git, with clear commit messages explaining the purpose of each change.
    5. Document the origin and version of all external scripts and tools used within the workflow. Consider using a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) tool, but ensure it captures Nextflow-specific dependencies.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Malicious Script Injection (High Severity): Directly reduces the risk of malicious code being introduced into the workflow definition itself.
    • Compromised Dependency (within the workflow) (High Severity): Helps identify if a script called by the workflow has been tampered with.
    • Unintentional Vulnerabilities (in Nextflow code) (Medium Severity): Increases the likelihood of catching coding errors in the Nextflow DSL that could lead to vulnerabilities.
    • Supply Chain Attacks (targeting workflow scripts) (High Severity): By tracking the provenance of scripts used within the workflow, it becomes easier to respond to supply chain attacks.

  • Impact:

    • Malicious Script Injection: Significantly reduces risk (e.g., 80% reduction).
    • Compromised Dependency (within workflow): Moderately reduces risk (e.g., 50% reduction).
    • Unintentional Vulnerabilities (Nextflow code): Moderately reduces risk (e.g., 60% reduction).
    • Supply Chain Attacks (workflow scripts): Moderately reduces risk (e.g., 40% reduction).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Git is used for version control.
    • Basic code reviews are performed, but not consistently or with a security focus on the Nextflow DSL.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Formal, security-focused code review process specifically for Nextflow DSL, with mandatory two-person approval.
    • Documentation of the origin and version of all external scripts called by process blocks.
    • Regular audits of the code review process.

Mitigation Strategy: 2. Resource Limits (using resource directive)

  • Description:

    1. Utilize Nextflow's resource directive within each process block to define limits for CPU, memory, disk space, and time.
    2. Determine appropriate resource limits based on the expected resource consumption of each process. Start with conservative estimates and adjust based on monitoring.
    3. Use the errorStrategy directive in conjunction with resource limits to handle cases where a process exceeds its allocated resources. Options include:
      • terminate: Immediately terminate the workflow.
      • retry: Retry the process (potentially with increased resources, using the maxRetries and maxErrors directives).
      • ignore: Ignore the error and continue the workflow (use with caution!).
    4. Monitor resource usage during workflow execution using Nextflow's reporting features (e.g., -with-report, -with-trace, -with-timeline).
    5. Adjust resource limits as needed based on observed usage patterns.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Resource Exhaustion (Medium Severity): Prevents a single Nextflow process from consuming excessive resources and causing a denial-of-service on the execution host.
    • Fork Bombs (within a process) (Medium Severity): Limits the number of processes a malicious script within a Nextflow process can create.

  • Impact:

    • Resource Exhaustion: Significantly reduces risk (e.g., 90% reduction).
    • Fork Bombs (within process): Significantly reduces risk (e.g., 85% reduction).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Basic resource limits are set for some processes, but not consistently or comprehensively across all process blocks.
    • errorStrategy is not consistently used in conjunction with resource limits.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Consistent and comprehensive resource limits for all process blocks.
    • Consistent use of errorStrategy to handle resource limit violations.
    • Regular monitoring and adjustment of resource limits based on observed usage.

Mitigation Strategy: 3. Secure Executor Configuration (Nextflow executor and related directives)

  • Description:

    1. Carefully configure the Nextflow executor directive in the nextflow.config file. Choose the appropriate executor for your environment (e.g., local, slurm, awsbatch, kubernetes).
    2. For each executor, review and configure all relevant settings in nextflow.config according to security best practices for that specific executor. This often involves settings outside of Nextflow itself (e.g., configuring Kubernetes RBAC), but the nextflow.config file is where you tell Nextflow how to interact with the secured environment.
    3. Avoid using overly permissive settings. For example:
      • local: Avoid running Nextflow as the root user.
      • slurm: Use a dedicated, low-privilege user account for submitting jobs.
      • awsbatch: Use IAM roles with the principle of least privilege.
      • kubernetes: Use Kubernetes RBAC to restrict the permissions of the Nextflow pod.
    4. Securely manage credentials (e.g., API keys, service account tokens) used by Nextflow to interact with external services. Use Nextflow's secrets management features (e.g., $secrets.MY_SECRET) instead of hardcoding credentials in the workflow definition or nextflow.config.
    5. Regularly review and audit the nextflow.config file and the configuration of the underlying execution environment.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Unauthorized Access to Resources (High Severity): Prevents attackers from gaining access to compute resources through misconfigured executors.
    • Privilege Escalation (High Severity): Limits the privileges of the Nextflow process and the user account it runs under, preventing it from gaining excessive control over the execution environment.
    • Credential Theft (High Severity): Protects sensitive credentials used by Nextflow from being stolen by using Nextflow's secrets management.

  • Impact:

    • Unauthorized Access to Resources: Significantly reduces risk (e.g., 80% reduction).
    • Privilege Escalation: Significantly reduces risk (e.g., 75% reduction).
    • Credential Theft: Significantly reduces risk (e.g., 90% reduction).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Basic executor configuration is in place.
    • Credentials are not consistently managed using Nextflow's secrets features.
    • nextflow.config is not regularly reviewed for security best practices.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Comprehensive security review and hardening of the nextflow.config file and the underlying executor configurations.
    • Consistent use of Nextflow's secrets management features for all credentials.
    • Regular audits of the executor configuration.

Mitigation Strategy: 4. Plugin Security (Nextflow Plugins)

  • Description:

    1. Before using any Nextflow plugin, thoroughly vet it:
      • Review the plugin's source code (if available) for potential vulnerabilities.
      • Check the reputation of the plugin developer or maintainer.
      • Search for any known security advisories related to the plugin.
    2. Prefer plugins from trusted sources, such as the official Nextflow organization or well-known and reputable community contributors.
    3. Use specific versions of plugins (version pinning) in your nextflow.config file. Avoid using the latest version implicitly. Example: 
      plugins {
    id '[email protected]' // Use a specific version
}
    4. Regularly update plugins to the latest secure versions, but test thoroughly before deploying to production.
    5. Be aware that plugins can introduce new attack vectors, so limit their use to essential functionality.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Malicious Plugin (High Severity): Reduces the risk of installing a deliberately malicious Nextflow plugin.
    • Compromised Plugin (High Severity): Helps identify if a plugin has been tampered with (especially when combined with version pinning).
    • Vulnerable Plugin (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of exploiting vulnerabilities in a Nextflow plugin.

  • Impact:

    • Malicious Plugin: Significantly reduces risk (e.g., 70% reduction).
    • Compromised Plugin: Moderately reduces risk (e.g., 50% reduction).
    • Vulnerable Plugin: Moderately reduces risk (e.g., 60% reduction).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Plugins are used without a formal vetting process.
    • Plugin versions are not consistently pinned.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Formal plugin vetting process before installation.
    • Consistent use of version pinning for all plugins in nextflow.config.
    • Regular updates to plugins, with testing before deployment.

Mitigation Strategy: 5. Workflow Verification (Digital Signatures - Advanced/Future)

  • Description:

    • This is a more advanced technique and may not be fully supported by current Nextflow versions, but it's a crucial future direction.
    1. Implement a system for digitally signing Nextflow workflow definitions and scripts. This could involve:
      • Using GPG (GNU Privacy Guard) to sign the main.nf file and any associated scripts.
      • Developing a custom Nextflow plugin or extension to verify signatures before execution.
    2. Establish a secure key management infrastructure for managing the signing keys.
    3. Configure Nextflow (potentially through a custom plugin) to verify the digital signatures of workflow files before execution. Reject any workflow that fails signature verification.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Workflow Tampering (High Severity): Ensures that the workflow code has not been modified since it was signed by a trusted authority.
    • Supply Chain Attacks (targeting workflow definition) (High Severity): Prevents the execution of workflows that have been tampered with as part of a supply chain attack.

  • Impact:

    • Workflow Tampering: Significantly reduces risk (e.g., 95% reduction).
    • Supply Chain Attacks (workflow definition): Significantly reduces risk (e.g., 90% reduction).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Not implemented.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Research and development of a digital signature verification mechanism for Nextflow workflows.
    • Implementation of secure key management.
    • Integration with Nextflow (potentially through a custom plugin).