Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
85 lines (73 loc) · 9.74 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

85 lines (73 loc) · 9.74 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for pongasoft/glu

Objective: Compromise application using Glu by exploiting vulnerabilities within Glu itself.

Attack Tree Visualization

[CRITICAL NODE] Compromise Glu-Based Application ├───(OR)─ [HIGH-RISK PATH] Exploit Configuration Loading Vulnerabilities │ ├───(AND)─ [CRITICAL NODE] Malicious Configuration Source │ │ ├───(OR)─ [HIGH-RISK PATH] Supply Malicious Configuration File │ │ │ ├───* [CRITICAL NODE] Attacker gains write access to configuration file location │ │ │ │ └─── Action: Exploit OS/Application vulnerabilities to gain write access to the filesystem where Glu reads configuration files. │ │ └───(AND)─ [HIGH-RISK PATH] Configuration Injection via Input │ │ ├───* [CRITICAL NODE] Exploit Input Validation Weaknesses in Application │ │ │ └─── Action: Identify application inputs that influence Glu configuration loading paths or values. Inject malicious paths or values to manipulate configuration loading behavior. (Indirect Glu vulnerability, depends on application design) │ │ └───(AND)─ [HIGH-RISK PATH] Leverage Default Configuration Behavior │ │ └─── Action: Understand Glu's default configuration loading behavior (e.g., default file paths, classpath scanning). Place malicious configuration files in locations where Glu might automatically pick them up. │ ├───(OR)─ [HIGH-RISK PATH] Exploit Configuration Processing Vulnerabilities │ │ ├───(AND)─ [CRITICAL NODE] YAML/JSON Parsing Vulnerabilities │ │ │ ├───(OR)─ [HIGH-RISK PATH] Code Execution via YAML/JSON Deserialization (if applicable) │ │ │ │ └─── Action: If Glu or underlying YAML/JSON library is vulnerable to deserialization attacks, craft malicious YAML/JSON payloads that, when parsed by Glu, lead to arbitrary code execution on the server. (Requires investigation into Glu's YAML/JSON handling and dependencies) │ │ └───(AND)─ [HIGH-RISK PATH] Property Injection Vulnerabilities │ │ ├───* [HIGH-RISK PATH] Exploit Insecure Property Handling in Application Components │ │ │ └─── Action: If application components using Glu-injected properties are vulnerable to injection attacks (e.g., SQL injection, command injection) due to insecure handling of configuration values, exploit these vulnerabilities by manipulating configuration data. (Indirect Glu vulnerability, depends on application code) │ ├───(OR)─ [HIGH-RISK PATH] Exploit Dependency Injection (DI) Vulnerabilities │ │ ├───(AND)─ [HIGH-RISK PATH] Malicious Component Injection │ │ │ ├───* [CRITICAL NODE - Potential] Control Component Class Name/Path via Configuration │ │ │ │ └─── Action: If Glu allows specifying component class names or paths through configuration (e.g., in YAML/JSON), inject malicious class names or paths pointing to attacker-controlled code. Glu would then instantiate and potentially execute this malicious code. (Requires deep dive into Glu's configuration syntax and component registration mechanisms) │ │ └───(AND)─ [HIGH-RISK PATH] Vulnerable Dependencies of Glu itself │ │ └─── Action: Identify and exploit known vulnerabilities in the dependencies used by Glu library itself. This could indirectly compromise applications using Glu. (Requires dependency analysis of Glu and monitoring for CVEs)

Attack Tree Path: 1. [CRITICAL NODE] Compromise Glu-Based Application (Root Goal)

  • Description: The ultimate objective of the attacker is to gain unauthorized control over the application utilizing Glu. Success at this root goal implies significant security breach.
  • Impact: Critical - Full control over the application, data breach, service disruption, reputational damage.

Attack Tree Path: 2. [HIGH-RISK PATH] Exploit Configuration Loading Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Attackers target weaknesses in how Glu loads its configuration. Successful exploitation allows manipulation of the application's behavior through modified configuration.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • [HIGH-RISK PATH] Supply Malicious Configuration File:
      • [CRITICAL NODE] Attacker gains write access to configuration file location:
        • Description: The attacker needs to obtain write permissions to the directory where Glu reads configuration files.
        • Action: Exploit operating system or application vulnerabilities (e.g., directory traversal, insecure file permissions, application-specific upload flaws) to gain write access.
        • Impact: High - Allows direct replacement of configuration files.
    • [HIGH-RISK PATH] Configuration Injection via Input:
      • [CRITICAL NODE] Exploit Input Validation Weaknesses in Application:
        • Description: The application might use user-controlled inputs to construct paths or values used by Glu for configuration loading. Insufficient input validation can be exploited.
        • Action: Identify application inputs that influence configuration loading. Inject malicious paths (e.g., "../../../malicious.yaml") or values to load attacker-controlled configuration files or manipulate configuration parameters.
        • Impact: Medium/High - Can lead to loading malicious configuration or altering application behavior.
    • [HIGH-RISK PATH] Leverage Default Configuration Behavior:
      • Description: Attackers exploit Glu's default configuration loading mechanisms (e.g., searching for configuration files in standard locations).
      • Action: Understand Glu's default configuration file paths and classpath scanning behavior. Place malicious configuration files in these locations, hoping Glu will automatically load them.
      • Impact: Medium/High - Can lead to loading malicious configuration if default locations are accessible and writable by the attacker.

Attack Tree Path: 3. [HIGH-RISK PATH] Exploit Configuration Processing Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Attackers target vulnerabilities in how Glu processes configuration data, particularly YAML/JSON parsing and property handling.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • [HIGH-RISK PATH] Code Execution via YAML/JSON Deserialization (if applicable):
      • [CRITICAL NODE] YAML/JSON Parsing Vulnerabilities:
        • Description: If Glu or the underlying YAML/JSON library is vulnerable to deserialization attacks, malicious YAML/JSON payloads can be crafted to execute arbitrary code.
        • Action: Investigate Glu's YAML/JSON handling and dependencies. If deserialization vulnerabilities are present, craft malicious YAML/JSON configuration data that, when parsed by Glu, triggers code execution.
        • Impact: High - Arbitrary code execution on the server.
    • [HIGH-RISK PATH] Property Injection Vulnerabilities:
      • [CRITICAL NODE] YAML/JSON Parsing Vulnerabilities: (Indirectly related, as configuration is parsed)
      • [HIGH-RISK PATH] Exploit Insecure Property Handling in Application Components:
        • Description: Application components using Glu-injected properties might be vulnerable to injection attacks (e.g., SQL injection, command injection) if they handle configuration values insecurely.
        • Action: Identify application components that use Glu-injected properties. Analyze how these properties are used. If insecure handling is found, manipulate configuration data to inject malicious payloads (e.g., SQL injection strings, command injection commands) via Glu configuration.
        • Impact: Medium/High - Data breach, unauthorized access, command execution depending on the injection vulnerability.

Attack Tree Path: 4. [HIGH-RISK PATH] Exploit Dependency Injection (DI) Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Attackers target Glu's core functionality - Dependency Injection - to inject malicious components or exploit vulnerabilities in Glu's dependency management.
  • Attack Vectors:
    • [HIGH-RISK PATH] Malicious Component Injection:
      • [CRITICAL NODE - Potential] Control Component Class Name/Path via Configuration:
        • Description: If Glu allows specifying component class names or paths through configuration, attackers can inject malicious code by providing paths to attacker-controlled classes.
        • Action: [CRITICAL INVESTIGATION NEEDED] Review Glu documentation and code to determine if class names or paths can be specified in configuration. If possible, craft malicious Java classes and configure Glu to load them.
        • Impact: High - Arbitrary code execution, full application compromise.
    • [HIGH-RISK PATH] Vulnerable Dependencies of Glu itself:
      • Description: Glu relies on third-party libraries. Vulnerabilities in these dependencies can indirectly compromise applications using Glu.
      • Action: Perform dependency analysis of Glu. Monitor CVE databases for vulnerabilities in Glu's dependencies. If vulnerabilities are found, exploit them to compromise the application.
      • Impact: Medium/High - Depends on the vulnerability and affected dependency, can range from DoS to code execution.