Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
65 lines (56 loc) · 8.84 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

65 lines (56 loc) · 8.84 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for pongasoft/glu

Mitigation Strategy: Disable Glu in Production Environments

  • Description:
    • Step 1: Identify the mechanism used to enable Glu in your application (e.g., environment variable, build profile flag, configuration file setting).
    • Step 2: In your production build process and deployment scripts, ensure this mechanism is explicitly disabled. This might involve setting an environment variable like GLU_ENABLED=false, using a production build profile that excludes Glu initialization, or configuring a setting to disable Glu at application startup.
    • Step 3: Verify in your production deployments that Glu endpoints are not accessible. Attempt to access known Glu endpoints (e.g., /reload, /classes) after deployment to confirm they return a 404 Not Found error or are blocked by your application's routing.
    • Step 4: Regularly audit your production configuration and build process to ensure Glu remains disabled and is not accidentally re-enabled.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized Code Injection (High Severity): Glu's hot-swapping functionality allows arbitrary code to be injected into a running application. If enabled in production, attackers could exploit this to inject malicious code and gain control of the application and potentially the server.
    • Unauthorized Access to Application Internals (Medium Severity): Glu exposes endpoints that can reveal internal application details, loaded classes, and potentially configuration information. This information can be valuable for attackers in reconnaissance and planning further attacks.
    • Information Disclosure (Medium Severity): Depending on the application and how Glu is used, it might inadvertently expose sensitive data through its endpoints or logging during development, which could be accessible if Glu is active in production.
  • Impact:
    • Unauthorized Code Injection: Significantly reduces risk. Disabling Glu in production completely eliminates the primary attack vector for remote code injection via Glu's intended functionality.
    • Unauthorized Access to Application Internals: Significantly reduces risk. Prevents attackers from using Glu endpoints to probe the application's internal structure and configuration.
    • Information Disclosure: Significantly reduces risk. Eliminates the potential for unintended information exposure through Glu in production.
  • Currently Implemented: Yes, in production build scripts (using environment variable GLU_ENABLED=false and production build profiles that exclude Glu initialization).
  • Missing Implementation: Consider adding automated integration tests in the CI/CD pipeline to explicitly verify that Glu endpoints are inaccessible in production deployments.

Mitigation Strategy: Restrict Network Access to Glu Endpoints in Non-Production Environments

  • Description:
    • Step 1: Identify the network ports and paths where Glu endpoints are exposed in your development and testing environments.
    • Step 2: Implement network access controls (e.g., firewall rules, network segmentation, VPNs) to restrict access to these endpoints. Allow access only from authorized developer machines or internal development networks.
    • Step 3: Configure your development environment to use a dedicated network segment or VLAN, isolating it from public networks and potentially sensitive internal networks.
    • Step 4: If using cloud-based development environments, leverage security groups or network policies provided by the cloud provider to restrict inbound traffic to Glu endpoints.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized Code Injection (Medium Severity in non-production): While less critical than in production, unauthorized code injection in development/testing can still disrupt development workflows, introduce backdoors, or be used for lateral movement if development environments are not properly isolated.
    • Unauthorized Access to Application Internals (Low Severity in non-production): Less critical in development, but still undesirable to expose internal details to unauthorized individuals even within a development context.
  • Impact:
    • Unauthorized Code Injection: Moderately reduces risk in non-production. Limits the attack surface by preventing external attackers from directly exploiting Glu endpoints in development/testing.
    • Unauthorized Access to Application Internals: Moderately reduces risk in non-production. Limits unintended exposure of internal details within development environments.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Development environments are generally behind a corporate firewall, but specific network restrictions for Glu endpoints are not explicitly configured.
  • Missing Implementation: Implement specific firewall rules or network policies to restrict access to Glu endpoints (e.g., only allow access from developer workstations' IP ranges or VPN).

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Authentication and Authorization for Glu Endpoints (If Feasible and Necessary in Non-Production)

  • Description:
    • Step 1: Investigate if Glu or the underlying application framework allows for adding authentication and authorization to specific endpoints.
    • Step 2: If possible, implement a basic authentication mechanism (e.g., HTTP Basic Auth) or integrate with your application's existing authentication system to protect Glu endpoints.
    • Step 3: Define authorization rules to control which users or roles are allowed to access and use Glu endpoints (e.g., only allow developers with specific roles to trigger reloads).
    • Step 4: Be mindful that adding complex security to Glu might hinder its intended rapid development workflow. Balance security with developer productivity. If implementation is overly complex, prioritize network restrictions instead.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized Code Injection (Low Severity in non-production, if network restrictions are also in place): Adds an extra layer of defense against unauthorized code injection attempts, even from within the restricted network.
    • Unauthorized Access to Application Internals (Low Severity in non-production): Further restricts access to internal application details, even for users within the development network who might not be authorized to use Glu.
  • Impact:
    • Unauthorized Code Injection: Minimally reduces risk in non-production (assuming network restrictions are primary defense). Provides defense-in-depth.
    • Unauthorized Access to Application Internals: Minimally reduces risk in non-production. Adds a layer of access control.
  • Currently Implemented: No. Authentication and authorization are not currently implemented for Glu endpoints in development environments.
  • Missing Implementation: Evaluate the feasibility and overhead of adding authentication to Glu endpoints. If deemed practical and beneficial, implement basic authentication or integrate with existing development environment authentication mechanisms.

Mitigation Strategy: Minimize Information Exposed by Glu

  • Description:
    • Step 1: Review Glu's configuration options and identify any settings that control the level of detail exposed through its endpoints (e.g., logging verbosity, exposed class information).
    • Step 2: Configure Glu to minimize the amount of information it reveals. Disable verbose logging, limit the details provided about loaded classes, and avoid exposing sensitive configuration data through Glu's interface.
    • Step 3: Regularly review Glu's default configuration and any updates to ensure that it does not inadvertently start exposing more information than intended.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Information Disclosure (Low to Medium Severity in non-production): Glu might expose internal application details that could be useful for attackers in reconnaissance, even in development environments. Minimizing exposed information reduces this risk.
  • Impact:
    • Information Disclosure: Minimally to Moderately reduces risk in non-production. Limits the amount of potentially sensitive information exposed through Glu endpoints.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Default Glu configuration is used, but specific minimization of exposed information has not been actively configured.
  • Missing Implementation: Review Glu's configuration options and implement settings to minimize information disclosure through its endpoints. Document these configurations.