Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
146 lines (115 loc) · 20.6 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

146 lines (115 loc) · 20.6 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for spinnaker/clouddriver

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Cloud Provider Credentials Management for Clouddriver

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Identify all locations within Clouddriver's configuration and deployment manifests where cloud provider credentials (AWS, Azure, GCP API keys, etc.) are currently stored. This often includes environment variables within deployment manifests or configuration files mounted into Clouddriver containers.

    • Step 2: Integrate Clouddriver with a dedicated secrets management solution (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, Google Cloud Secret Manager). Ensure the chosen solution is compatible with Clouddriver's deployment environment.

    • Step 3: Migrate all cloud provider credentials used by Clouddriver from their current locations to the chosen secrets management solution. Store these as secrets, ensuring proper encryption and access control within the secrets manager.

    • Step 4: Configure Clouddriver's deployment manifests and configuration to retrieve cloud provider credentials dynamically from the secrets management solution at runtime. This typically involves using secrets manager integration features provided by the deployment platform (e.g., Kubernetes secrets, environment variable injection from secrets manager). Clouddriver configuration should reference the secret in the secrets manager, not the raw credential value.

    • Step 5: Remove all hardcoded cloud provider credentials from Clouddriver's deployment manifests, configuration files, and any other insecure locations.

    • Step 6: Implement Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) within the secrets management solution to restrict access to Clouddriver's cloud provider credentials. Only Clouddriver service accounts or authorized operators should have access.

    • Step 7: Enable audit logging within the secrets management solution to track access to Clouddriver's credentials and monitor for unauthorized attempts.

    • Step 8: Implement automated rotation of cloud provider API keys within the secrets management solution and ensure Clouddriver is configured to seamlessly handle key rotation without service disruption.

    • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Exposure of Cloud Provider Credentials Used by Clouddriver (Severity: High): If Clouddriver's cloud provider credentials are stored insecurely, attackers compromising Clouddriver can gain full control over managed cloud resources.

    • Credential Theft from Clouddriver Configuration (Severity: High): Clouddriver configuration files and deployment manifests are potential targets. Embedded credentials are easily stolen.

    • Unauthorized Cloud Resource Access via Compromised Clouddriver (Severity: High): Compromised Clouddriver with access to cloud credentials can be used to launch attacks against the managed cloud infrastructure.

    • Impact:

    • Exposure of Cloud Provider Credentials Used by Clouddriver: High reduction - Secrets are encrypted, access controlled via secrets manager, and not directly present in Clouddriver's configuration.

    • Credential Theft from Clouddriver Configuration: High reduction - Credentials are not stored in Clouddriver's configuration files or manifests.

    • Unauthorized Cloud Resource Access via Compromised Clouddriver: High reduction - Significantly reduces the risk by limiting credential exposure within Clouddriver itself.

    • Currently Implemented:

    • Implemented in: Partially implemented. We use AWS Secrets Manager for storing database credentials used by Clouddriver internally.

    • Missing Implementation:

    • Missing in: Cloud provider credentials (AWS, Azure, GCP API keys) that Clouddriver uses to interact with target cloud environments are still stored as environment variables in Clouddriver's deployment manifests. Rotation of these keys for Clouddriver is manual. RBAC for secrets access is not specifically configured for Clouddriver's cloud provider credentials.

Mitigation Strategy: Dependency Vulnerability Management for Clouddriver

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Integrate a Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tool (e.g., Snyk, OWASP Dependency-Check, Black Duck) specifically into the Clouddriver build pipeline. This tool should be configured to scan Clouddriver's Java and Python dependencies (including transitive dependencies) for known vulnerabilities.

    • Step 2: Configure the SCA tool to generate reports on Clouddriver dependency vulnerabilities and ideally fail the Clouddriver build process if vulnerabilities exceeding a defined severity threshold (e.g., High or Medium) are detected.

    • Step 3: Establish a dedicated process for the Clouddriver development team to regularly review and remediate vulnerabilities identified by the SCA tool. This includes:

      • Prioritizing vulnerabilities affecting Clouddriver based on severity and exploitability within the Clouddriver context.
      • Updating vulnerable Clouddriver dependencies to patched versions.
      • If patches are unavailable for Clouddriver dependencies, investigating workarounds or alternative dependencies compatible with Clouddriver.

    • Step 4: Subscribe to security advisories and vulnerability databases specifically related to Spinnaker Clouddriver and its Java/Python dependencies to proactively identify and address potential vulnerabilities.

    • Step 5: Regularly update the Clouddriver codebase and its dependencies to the latest stable versions as part of the Clouddriver maintenance process, ensuring security patches are applied promptly.

    • Step 6: Automate the dependency update process for Clouddriver where feasible to ensure timely patching and reduce manual effort.

    • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities in Clouddriver Dependencies (Severity: High): Attackers can exploit vulnerabilities in Clouddriver's libraries to compromise Clouddriver itself, potentially gaining access to cloud credentials or disrupting operations.

    • Supply Chain Attacks Targeting Clouddriver (Severity: Medium): Compromised dependencies introduced into Clouddriver's build process can inject malicious code directly into Clouddriver.

    • Data Breaches via Vulnerable Libraries in Clouddriver (Severity: Medium): Vulnerabilities in libraries used by Clouddriver for data handling could lead to data breaches if Clouddriver processes sensitive information.

    • Impact:

    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities in Clouddriver Dependencies: High reduction - Proactive scanning and patching of Clouddriver dependencies significantly reduces the attack surface of Clouddriver itself.

    • Supply Chain Attacks Targeting Clouddriver: Medium reduction - SCA helps detect known malicious dependencies before they are integrated into Clouddriver, but zero-day supply chain attacks remain a challenge.

    • Data Breaches via Vulnerable Libraries in Clouddriver: Medium reduction - Reduces the likelihood of data breaches originating from known vulnerabilities within Clouddriver's libraries.

    • Currently Implemented:

    • Implemented in: We have a basic command-line dependency check in our CI pipeline that scans Clouddriver's direct dependencies.

    • Missing Implementation:

    • Missing in: No fully integrated automated SCA tool specifically for Clouddriver. Scanning of transitive dependencies of Clouddriver is not comprehensive. Vulnerability remediation process for Clouddriver dependencies is manual and not consistently enforced. Automated build failure for Clouddriver on vulnerability detection is not configured. No dedicated subscription to security advisories for Spinnaker Clouddriver dependencies.

Mitigation Strategy: Enforce Strong Authentication and Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) for Clouddriver APIs

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Configure Spinnaker's security settings to strictly enforce authentication for all Clouddriver API endpoints. Ensure anonymous access to Clouddriver APIs is disabled.

    • Step 2: Integrate Spinnaker's authentication for Clouddriver APIs with your organization's central identity provider (IdP) using protocols like SAML, OAuth 2.0, or LDAP. This ensures users accessing Clouddriver APIs authenticate using their organizational credentials.

    • Step 3: Define granular roles within Spinnaker RBAC that specifically control access to different functionalities and API endpoints within Clouddriver. Examples include roles for read-only access to Clouddriver data, roles for triggering deployments via Clouddriver, and administrative roles for managing Clouddriver configuration.

    • Step 4: Assign users to appropriate Clouddriver-specific roles based on their job functions and the principle of least privilege.

    • Step 5: Configure RBAC policies within Spinnaker to precisely map these Clouddriver-specific roles to permissions for accessing Clouddriver APIs. Restrict access to sensitive Clouddriver API endpoints (e.g., those related to cloud provider credential retrieval, infrastructure modification, pipeline execution management) to only highly authorized roles.

    • Step 6: Regularly review and update Clouddriver RBAC policies to ensure they remain aligned with evolving organizational security requirements and changes in user roles and responsibilities related to Clouddriver.

    • Step 7: Implement detailed audit logging specifically for authentication attempts and authorization decisions made when accessing Clouddriver APIs. Monitor these logs for suspicious activity and unauthorized access attempts to Clouddriver.

    • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Unauthorized Access to Clouddriver APIs (Severity: High): Without strong authentication and authorization, unauthorized users could potentially interact with Clouddriver APIs, leading to data breaches, unauthorized deployments, or disruption of services.

    • Privilege Escalation within Clouddriver (Severity: Medium): Insufficiently granular RBAC in Clouddriver could allow users to gain access to Clouddriver functionalities beyond their intended roles, potentially leading to misuse or abuse of Clouddriver's capabilities.

    • Data Modification or Infrastructure Changes via Unauthorized Clouddriver API Access (Severity: High): Lack of proper access control to Clouddriver APIs can enable unauthorized users to modify critical data managed by Clouddriver or make unauthorized changes to cloud infrastructure.

    • Impact:

    • Unauthorized Access to Clouddriver APIs: High reduction - Strong authentication and RBAC effectively prevent unauthorized access to Clouddriver's API functionalities.

    • Privilege Escalation within Clouddriver: Medium reduction - Granular RBAC limits privilege escalation within Clouddriver, but careful policy design and maintenance are crucial.

    • Data Modification or Infrastructure Changes via Unauthorized Clouddriver API Access: High reduction - Access control to Clouddriver APIs prevents unauthorized modifications and infrastructure changes initiated through Clouddriver.

    • Currently Implemented:

    • Implemented in: Spinnaker is integrated with our corporate Okta IdP for authentication for all Spinnaker components, including Clouddriver. Basic Spinnaker roles (viewer, editor) are in place.

    • Missing Implementation:

    • Missing in: Granular RBAC policies specifically tailored for Clouddriver APIs are not fully defined and enforced. Role assignments for Clouddriver access are not regularly reviewed and updated based on Clouddriver-specific responsibilities. Detailed audit logging focused on Clouddriver API access and authorization events is not comprehensively configured.

Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation and Data Sanitization within Clouddriver

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Conduct a thorough review of Clouddriver's codebase to identify all input points where Clouddriver receives data. This includes API endpoints, configuration parameters processed by Clouddriver, and data ingested from external systems like cloud provider APIs and event streams.

    • Step 2: Implement strict input validation routines within Clouddriver for all identified input points. This validation should include:

      • Data type validation within Clouddriver's code to ensure data conforms to expected types (e.g., validating API request bodies, configuration values).
      • Format validation within Clouddriver to check data against expected formats (e.g., validating resource names, ARNs, image tags).
      • Range validation within Clouddriver to ensure data values are within acceptable limits (e.g., validating resource quotas, timeouts).
      • Whitelist validation within Clouddriver where appropriate to only accept known and safe values for specific input fields.

    • Step 3: Implement data sanitization functions within Clouddriver to sanitize data before it is processed, stored, or used in commands executed by Clouddriver. This includes:

      • Encoding or escaping special characters within Clouddriver to prevent injection vulnerabilities (e.g., when constructing database queries, shell commands, or API requests to cloud providers).
      • Removing or replacing potentially harmful characters or patterns from input data within Clouddriver.

    • Step 4: Apply input validation and sanitization logic as early as possible within Clouddriver's data processing pipelines to minimize the risk of malicious data propagating through the system.

    • Step 5: Establish a process for the Clouddriver development team to regularly review and update input validation and sanitization rules within Clouddriver to address new attack vectors and evolving security threats relevant to Clouddriver's functionalities.

    • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Injection Attacks against Clouddriver (Severity: High): Lack of input validation in Clouddriver can make it vulnerable to injection attacks like command injection, LDAP injection, or even SQL injection if Clouddriver interacts with databases directly for certain operations.

    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Clouddriver UI (Severity: Medium): If Clouddriver has any UI components that display user-provided data (though less common in backend services like Clouddriver), insufficient sanitization could lead to XSS vulnerabilities within the Clouddriver UI.

    • Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks Targeting Clouddriver via Malformed Input (Severity: Medium): Maliciously crafted inputs sent to Clouddriver APIs or configuration could potentially cause Clouddriver to crash, consume excessive resources, or become unresponsive, leading to DoS.

    • Impact:

    • Injection Attacks against Clouddriver: High reduction - Robust input validation and sanitization within Clouddriver are essential for preventing injection attacks targeting Clouddriver itself.

    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Clouddriver UI: Medium reduction - Sanitization reduces XSS risks if Clouddriver has UI elements, though Clouddriver is primarily a backend service.

    • Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks Targeting Clouddriver via Malformed Input: Medium reduction - Input validation can prevent certain DoS attacks caused by intentionally malformed or oversized inputs sent to Clouddriver.

    • Currently Implemented:

    • Implemented in: Basic input validation is likely present in certain parts of the Clouddriver codebase, particularly for validating API parameters and configuration values.

    • Missing Implementation:

    • Missing in: Comprehensive and consistent input validation and sanitization are not systematically implemented across all Clouddriver components and input points. Specific sanitization routines tailored for different data contexts within Clouddriver (e.g., when constructing commands for cloud providers, when interacting with internal databases) may be lacking. Regular reviews and updates of Clouddriver's validation rules are not formally in place.

Mitigation Strategy: Regular Security Assessments and Penetration Testing Focused on Clouddriver

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Schedule periodic security assessments specifically targeting your Spinnaker Clouddriver deployment, at least annually or more frequently if significant changes are made to Clouddriver or its configurations.

    • Step 2: Conduct vulnerability scanning specifically focused on the infrastructure hosting Clouddriver, Clouddriver's application dependencies, and Clouddriver's configurations. Utilize vulnerability scanners that are effective for Java and Python applications and containerized environments.

    • Step 3: Perform manual security code reviews of Clouddriver's configurations, custom extensions (if any), and relevant parts of the Clouddriver codebase to identify potential security flaws specific to your deployment and usage patterns.

    • Step 4: Engage external security experts to conduct penetration testing specifically against your deployed Clouddriver environment. Penetration tests should simulate realistic attack scenarios targeting Clouddriver, including attempts to exploit API vulnerabilities, gain unauthorized access, or compromise cloud provider credentials managed by Clouddriver.

    • Step 5: Document all identified vulnerabilities and security weaknesses discovered during Clouddriver-focused assessments and penetration testing.

    • Step 6: Prioritize remediation efforts for Clouddriver vulnerabilities based on their severity, exploitability, and potential impact on Spinnaker and managed cloud environments.

    • Step 7: Implement remediation measures to address identified Clouddriver vulnerabilities, including patching, configuration changes, or code modifications.

    • Step 8: Conduct re-testing of remediated Clouddriver vulnerabilities to verify that they have been effectively addressed and do not re-emerge.

    • Step 9: Integrate findings from Clouddriver security assessments and penetration testing into the ongoing security improvement process for Clouddriver, informing development practices and configuration standards.

    • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Unknown Vulnerabilities in Clouddriver (Severity: Varies, can be High): Security assessments and penetration testing specifically targeting Clouddriver help uncover vulnerabilities that might be missed by general infrastructure scans or dependency checks.

    • Clouddriver-Specific Configuration Errors (Severity: Medium to High): Assessments can identify misconfigurations within Clouddriver itself that could introduce security weaknesses or expose sensitive information.

    • Zero-Day Exploits Targeting Clouddriver (Severity: High): While not directly preventing zero-day exploits, regular Clouddriver-focused assessments improve the overall security posture of Clouddriver, making successful exploitation more difficult and improving detection capabilities.

    • Impact:

    • Unknown Vulnerabilities in Clouddriver: High reduction - Proactive identification and remediation of unknown vulnerabilities within Clouddriver significantly reduces the risk of exploitation.

    • Clouddriver-Specific Configuration Errors: Medium to High reduction - Assessments help identify and correct Clouddriver-specific misconfigurations that could lead to security issues.

    • Zero-Day Exploits Targeting Clouddriver: Low to Medium reduction - Improves Clouddriver's overall security posture, making exploitation harder and improving chances of detection, but doesn't directly prevent zero-day attacks.

    • Currently Implemented:

    • Implemented in: We perform quarterly vulnerability scans of our infrastructure, which includes the servers hosting Clouddriver.

    • Missing Implementation:

    • Missing in: No dedicated penetration testing is performed specifically targeting our Spinnaker Clouddriver deployment. Security code reviews are not regularly conducted specifically for Clouddriver configurations or customizations. Vulnerability scanning is primarily infrastructure-focused and may not deeply analyze application-level vulnerabilities within Clouddriver itself. Remediation tracking and re-testing processes are not specifically formalized for security assessment findings related to Clouddriver.