Mitigation Strategy: Keep Druid Updated
1. Mitigation Strategy: Keep Druid Updated
-
Description:
- Establish a Monitoring Process: Set up automated alerts (e.g., using Dependabot, Renovate) to monitor the official Alibaba Druid GitHub repository (releases and issues) and security advisories.
- Regular Update Schedule: Define a schedule for reviewing and applying updates (e.g., monthly, or immediately upon critical security patch release).
- Testing: Before deploying to production, thoroughly test the updated Druid version in a staging environment.
- Rollback Plan: Have a clear rollback plan.
- Documentation: Document the update process.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- SQL Injection (Critical): Vulnerabilities in Druid's SQL parser or filters.
- Denial of Service (DoS) (High): DoS vulnerabilities in Druid.
- Information Disclosure (High): Vulnerabilities exposing information through Druid.
- Deserialization Vulnerabilities (Critical): If present in Druid.
-
Impact:
- SQL Injection: Significantly reduces risk.
- DoS: Reduces likelihood.
- Information Disclosure: Reduces risk.
- Deserialization Vulnerabilities: Eliminates risk if patched.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Partially. Manual checks, no strict schedule. Dependabot not specifically for Druid.
-
Missing Implementation:
- Automated Druid-specific alerts.
- Formal update schedule and rollback plan.
- Consistent staging environment testing.
Mitigation Strategy: Minimize Filter Usage
2. Mitigation Strategy: Minimize Filter Usage
-
Description:
- Inventory: List all Druid filters in use.
- Justification: Document the reason for each filter.
- Elimination: Remove non-essential filters.
- Prioritization: Prefer built-in, well-tested Druid filters.
- Documentation: Record filters in use, their purpose, and rationale.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- SQL Injection (Critical): Reduces attack surface within Druid filters.
- Unknown Vulnerabilities (High): Reduces risk from less-used filters.
-
Impact:
- SQL Injection: Moderately reduces risk.
- Unknown Vulnerabilities: Significantly reduces risk.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Not implemented. Using several filters without clear necessity.
-
Missing Implementation:
- Inventory and justification of filters needed.
- Unnecessary filters not removed.
Mitigation Strategy: Strictly Configure wall
Filter (If Used)
3. Mitigation Strategy: Strictly Configure wall
Filter (If Used)
-
Description:
- Whitelist Approach: Configure
wall
with a whitelist, allowing only known-good SQL patterns. - Regular Expression Review: Use carefully crafted regular expressions.
- Testing: Test with valid and invalid SQL queries.
- Monitoring: Monitor
wall
filter logs. - Regular Review: Regularly review and update the configuration.
- Whitelist Approach: Configure
-
Threats Mitigated:
- SQL Injection (Critical): Additional defense against SQL injection within Druid.
-
Impact:
- SQL Injection: Moderately reduces risk (with correct configuration and other measures).
-
Currently Implemented:
- Partially.
wall
filter enabled, but likely too permissive.
- Partially.
-
Missing Implementation:
- Strict whitelist not fully implemented.
- Regular expression review/testing inconsistent.
wall
filter log monitoring not in place.
Mitigation Strategy: Disable StatViewServlet
in Production
4. Mitigation Strategy: Disable StatViewServlet
in Production
-
Description:
- Configuration: In
druid.properties
(or similar), setdruid.stat.view.servlet.enable=false
. - Verification: Verify the
/druid/*
endpoint is inaccessible (404 or 403 error). - Environment-Specific Configuration: Use separate config files (e.g.,
production.properties
).
- Configuration: In
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Information Disclosure (High): Prevents access to sensitive info exposed by
StatViewServlet
.
- Information Disclosure (High): Prevents access to sensitive info exposed by
-
Impact:
- Information Disclosure: Eliminates risk from
StatViewServlet
.
- Information Disclosure: Eliminates risk from
-
Currently Implemented:
- Implemented. Disabled in production.
-
Missing Implementation:
- None.
Mitigation Strategy: Restrict Access to Monitoring Endpoints (If Enabled)
5. Mitigation Strategy: Restrict Access to Monitoring Endpoints (If Enabled)
-
Description:
- Identify Endpoints: Identify Druid monitoring endpoints (JMX, custom).
- Authentication: Implement strong authentication for these endpoints.
- Authorization: Implement authorization for authorized users/roles.
- IP Whitelisting: Restrict access to specific IP addresses/ranges. This step is less directly about Druid's configuration and more about network configuration, but it's crucial if Druid's monitoring is exposed.
- Network Segmentation: Consider a separate network segment. This step is less directly about Druid's configuration and more about network configuration, but it's crucial if Druid's monitoring is exposed.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Information Disclosure (High): Limits access to monitoring data.
-
Impact:
- Information Disclosure: Significantly reduces risk.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Partially. Some IP whitelisting, but not comprehensive. Authentication inconsistent.
-
Missing Implementation:
- Strong authentication/authorization not fully implemented.
- IP whitelisting not applied to all endpoints.
Mitigation Strategy: Configure Connection Pool Limits
6. Mitigation Strategy: Configure Connection Pool Limits
-
Description:
- Analyze Requirements: Determine appropriate settings based on load and database capacity.
maxActive
: Set a reasonable limit for maximum active connections.minIdle
: Set a minimum number of idle connections.maxWait
: Set a maximum wait time for a connection.testOnBorrow
/testOnReturn
/testWhileIdle
: Configure connection validation.- Monitoring: Monitor connection pool usage.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Denial of Service (DoS) (High): Prevents connection exhaustion.
-
Impact:
- DoS: Significantly reduces risk.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Partially. Some limits configured, but not thoroughly analyzed.
-
Missing Implementation:
- Thorough analysis of requirements needed.
maxWait
and connection validation not consistently configured.- Connection pool monitoring not fully implemented.
Mitigation Strategy: Implement Timeouts
7. Mitigation Strategy: Implement Timeouts
-
Description:
- Identify Operations: Identify all database operations through Druid.
- Set Timeouts: Set timeouts (milliseconds) for each operation using Druid's configuration (e.g.,
queryTimeout
,transactionTimeout
). - Error Handling: Implement error handling for timeout exceptions.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Denial of Service (DoS) (High): Prevents long-running queries.
-
Impact:
- DoS: Significantly reduces risk.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Partially. Some timeouts set, but not consistently.
-
Missing Implementation:
- Comprehensive review of operations and timeouts needed.
- Consistent error handling for timeouts.
Mitigation Strategy: Avoid Deserializing Untrusted Data
8. Mitigation Strategy: Avoid Deserializing Untrusted Data
-
Description:
- Review Configuration: Ensure Druid is not configured to deserialize untrusted data.
- Disable Deserialization Features: Disable any such features unless absolutely necessary and the source is trusted.
- Input Validation: If unavoidable, validate before passing to Druid. This is less about Druid's configuration and more about how the application uses Druid.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Deserialization Vulnerabilities (Critical): Prevents code execution.
-
Impact:
- Deserialization Vulnerabilities: Eliminates risk if avoided.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Implemented. Configuration reviewed, no untrusted deserialization.
-
Missing Implementation:
- None.
Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Review Configuration
9. Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Review Configuration
-
Description:
- Schedule: Establish a regular schedule for reviewing Druid's configuration.
- Checklist: Create a checklist of security-relevant settings.
- Documentation: Document changes and rationale.
- Automation: Consider configuration management tools.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Misconfiguration (High): Identifies insecure settings.
- All other threats: Indirectly mitigates by ensuring proper configuration.
-
Impact:
- Misconfiguration: Significantly reduces risk.
- All other threats: Improves overall security.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Not implemented. Ad-hoc reviews, not scheduled.
-
Missing Implementation:
- Formal schedule and checklist needed.
- Configuration management tools not used for Druid.
Mitigation Strategy: Use external monitoring tools
10. Mitigation Strategy: Use external monitoring tools
-
Description:
- Choose Tools: Select external monitoring tools like Prometheus and Grafana.
- Configure Exporters: Configure Druid to expose metrics in a format compatible with the chosen monitoring tools (e.g., using a Prometheus exporter).
- Set Up Monitoring: Configure the monitoring tools to collect and visualize the Druid metrics.
- Secure Access: Secure access to the monitoring dashboards using authentication and authorization mechanisms.
- Alerting: Set up alerts based on the collected metrics to be notified of any anomalies or potential issues.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Information Disclosure (High): Avoids exposing sensitive information through Druid's built-in monitoring servlets.
- DoS (High): Provides better visibility into resource usage, allowing for early detection of potential DoS attacks.
-
Impact:
- Information Disclosure: Significantly reduces the risk of exposing sensitive information.
- DoS: Improves the ability to detect and respond to DoS attacks.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Not implemented.
-
Missing Implementation:
- External monitoring tools need to be selected, configured, and integrated with Druid.