Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
303 lines (251 loc) · 24.9 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

303 lines (251 loc) · 24.9 KB

Okay, let's perform a deep security analysis of Apache Druid based on the provided design document.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: The primary objective is to conduct a thorough security analysis of the Apache Druid architecture, identifying potential vulnerabilities and weaknesses in its key components and their interactions. This analysis will focus on the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data and the system itself, considering the business and security posture outlined in the design document. We aim to provide actionable mitigation strategies to address identified risks.

  • Scope: The scope of this analysis encompasses all core Druid components (Broker, Historical, MiddleManager, Peon, Coordinator, Overlord, Router), their interactions, and their dependencies on external systems (Deep Storage, Metadata Store, Data Sources). We will consider the Kubernetes deployment model described in the document. We will not delve into the security of the external systems themselves (e.g., S3, PostgreSQL, Kafka) beyond how Druid interacts with them. We will also consider the build process and its security implications.

  • Methodology:

    1. Component Analysis: We will analyze each Druid component individually, examining its responsibilities, security controls, and potential attack surfaces.
    2. Interaction Analysis: We will analyze the interactions between components, focusing on data flows and trust boundaries.
    3. Threat Modeling: We will use the STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) model to identify potential threats to each component and interaction.
    4. Vulnerability Identification: Based on the threat model and component analysis, we will identify specific vulnerabilities that could be exploited.
    5. Mitigation Recommendations: For each identified vulnerability, we will provide specific, actionable mitigation strategies tailored to the Druid architecture and deployment model.
    6. Codebase and Documentation Review: We will leverage information from the provided design document, the official Apache Druid documentation (https://druid.apache.org/docs/latest/design/), and, to a limited extent, infer potential issues from the codebase structure on GitHub (https://github.com/alibaba/druid). Note: This is not a full code audit, but rather an architectural review informed by code structure.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

We'll analyze each component using STRIDE and provide mitigation strategies.

  • Broker Node(s)

    • Responsibilities: Receives queries, routes them, aggregates results.
    • STRIDE:
      • Spoofing: An attacker could impersonate a legitimate client or another Druid node.
      • Tampering: An attacker could modify queries in transit or manipulate the Broker's internal state.
      • Repudiation: Lack of sufficient logging could make it difficult to trace malicious actions.
      • Information Disclosure: Exposure of sensitive data in query results or error messages. Leaking of internal Druid topology.
      • Denial of Service: Overwhelming the Broker with a large number of requests or complex queries.
      • Elevation of Privilege: Exploiting a vulnerability to gain unauthorized access to data or other Druid components.
    • Mitigation:
      • Authentication: Enforce strong authentication for all clients and inter-node communication (Kerberos, TLS client certificates).
      • Authorization: Implement RBAC to restrict access to specific datasources and actions based on user roles.
      • Input Validation: Strictly validate all incoming queries (SQL injection prevention, query parameter validation). Limit query complexity (e.g., maximum number of rows returned, query timeout).
      • Auditing: Log all queries, including the user, timestamp, query text, and result status.
      • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting to prevent DoS attacks.
      • TLS: Use TLS for all communication with clients and other Druid nodes.
      • Network Segmentation: Isolate the Broker nodes within a dedicated network segment.
      • Regular Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing.
      • WAF: Deploy a Web Application Firewall (WAF) in front of the Broker to protect against common web attacks.

  • Historical Node(s)

    • Responsibilities: Stores and serves historical data segments.
    • STRIDE:
      • Spoofing: An attacker could impersonate a Broker or Coordinator node.
      • Tampering: An attacker could modify data segments stored on the Historical node.
      • Repudiation: Insufficient logging of data access and modifications.
      • Information Disclosure: Unauthorized access to data segments.
      • Denial of Service: Overwhelming the Historical node with requests or resource exhaustion.
      • Elevation of Privilege: Exploiting a vulnerability to gain access to other parts of the system.
    • Mitigation:
      • Authentication: Enforce strong authentication for inter-node communication (Kerberos, TLS client certificates).
      • Authorization: Implement checks to ensure that only authorized requests from Brokers are served.
      • Data Integrity Monitoring: Implement mechanisms to detect unauthorized modification of data segments (e.g., checksums, regular integrity checks).
      • Auditing: Log all data access and modification attempts.
      • Resource Limits: Configure resource limits (CPU, memory, disk I/O) to prevent resource exhaustion.
      • TLS: Use TLS for all communication with other Druid nodes.
      • Network Segmentation: Isolate the Historical nodes within a dedicated network segment.
      • Secure Deep Storage: Rely on the security features of the underlying deep storage system (e.g., S3 server-side encryption, access controls).

  • MiddleManager Node(s)

    • Responsibilities: Manages real-time ingestion tasks (Peons).
    • STRIDE:
      • Spoofing: An attacker could impersonate an Overlord or Coordinator node.
      • Tampering: An attacker could modify task specifications or interfere with Peon processes.
      • Repudiation: Insufficient logging of task management actions.
      • Information Disclosure: Exposure of sensitive data during task execution.
      • Denial of Service: Overwhelming the MiddleManager with a large number of tasks or resource exhaustion.
      • Elevation of Privilege: Exploiting a vulnerability to gain control over Peon processes or access other Druid components.
    • Mitigation:
      • Authentication: Enforce strong authentication for inter-node communication.
      • Authorization: Implement checks to ensure that only authorized requests from Overlords are accepted.
      • Task Isolation: Run Peon tasks in isolated environments (e.g., separate containers, sandboxes) to prevent them from interfering with each other or the MiddleManager.
      • Resource Limits: Configure resource limits for Peon tasks.
      • Auditing: Log all task management actions and Peon activity.
      • TLS: Use TLS for all communication.
      • Network Segmentation: Isolate the MiddleManager nodes.
      • Secure Communication with Data Sources: Ensure secure communication with data sources (e.g., Kafka with TLS and authentication).

  • Peon Task(s)

    • Responsibilities: Ingests data, creates segments.
    • STRIDE:
      • Spoofing: Difficult to spoof, as Peons are short-lived and managed by the MiddleManager.
      • Tampering: An attacker could inject malicious data or code into the ingestion process.
      • Repudiation: Insufficient logging of data ingestion activities.
      • Information Disclosure: Exposure of sensitive data during ingestion.
      • Denial of Service: A malicious Peon task could consume excessive resources.
      • Elevation of Privilege: A compromised Peon task could potentially gain access to the MiddleManager or other resources.
    • Mitigation:
      • Input Validation: Thoroughly validate all ingested data, especially if it comes from untrusted sources. Use data schemas and type checking. Sanitize data to remove potentially harmful characters.
      • Task Isolation: Run Peon tasks in isolated environments (containers, sandboxes).
      • Resource Limits: Strictly enforce resource limits (CPU, memory, disk I/O, network bandwidth) for Peon tasks.
      • Auditing: Log all data ingestion activities, including the source of the data, the amount of data ingested, and any errors encountered.
      • Secure Communication with Data Sources: Use secure protocols and authentication when communicating with data sources.
      • Least Privilege: Grant Peon tasks only the minimum necessary permissions to access data sources and write to deep storage.
      • Code Review (for custom extensions): If using custom ingestion extensions, perform thorough code reviews to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

  • Coordinator Node(s)

    • Responsibilities: Manages data distribution and replication.
    • STRIDE:
      • Spoofing: An attacker could impersonate another Druid node.
      • Tampering: An attacker could modify data management instructions, leading to data loss or corruption.
      • Repudiation: Insufficient logging of data management actions.
      • Information Disclosure: Exposure of metadata about the Druid cluster.
      • Denial of Service: Overwhelming the Coordinator with requests.
      • Elevation of Privilege: Exploiting a vulnerability to gain control over data distribution or access other Druid components.
    • Mitigation:
      • Authentication: Enforce strong authentication for inter-node communication.
      • Authorization: Implement checks to ensure that only authorized requests are processed.
      • Data Integrity Checks: Implement mechanisms to verify the integrity of data segments during replication and balancing.
      • Auditing: Log all data management actions.
      • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting to prevent DoS attacks.
      • TLS: Use TLS for all communication.
      • Network Segmentation: Isolate the Coordinator nodes.

  • Overlord Node(s)

    • Responsibilities: Manages task assignment and scheduling.
    • STRIDE:
      • Spoofing: An attacker could impersonate another Druid node.
      • Tampering: An attacker could modify task assignments, leading to unauthorized data access or processing.
      • Repudiation: Insufficient logging of task management actions.
      • Information Disclosure: Exposure of metadata about tasks and resources.
      • Denial of Service: Overwhelming the Overlord with requests.
      • Elevation of Privilege: Exploiting a vulnerability to gain control over task scheduling or access other Druid components.
    • Mitigation:
      • Authentication: Enforce strong authentication for inter-node communication.
      • Authorization: Implement checks to ensure that only authorized requests are processed.
      • Auditing: Log all task management actions.
      • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting to prevent DoS attacks.
      • TLS: Use TLS for all communication.
      • Network Segmentation: Isolate the Overlord nodes.

  • Router Node(s)

    • Responsibilities: Provides a unified entry point, request routing.
    • STRIDE: Similar to Broker, but with a focus on routing.
      • Spoofing: An attacker could impersonate a client or a backend Druid node.
      • Tampering: An attacker could modify requests in transit.
      • Repudiation: Insufficient logging of routing decisions.
      • Information Disclosure: Leaking of internal Druid topology.
      • Denial of Service: Overwhelming the Router with requests.
      • Elevation of Privilege: Exploiting a vulnerability to bypass routing rules or access unauthorized services.
    • Mitigation:
      • Authentication: Enforce strong authentication for clients and potentially for backend nodes (if not already handled at the individual node level).
      • TLS: Use TLS for all communication, including client-facing and backend connections. Consider mutual TLS (mTLS) for enhanced security.
      • Network Segmentation: Isolate the Router nodes.
      • WAF: Deploy a WAF in front of the Router to protect against common web attacks.
      • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting to prevent DoS attacks.
      • Auditing: Log all routing decisions and request details.
      • Health Checks: Regularly check the health of backend nodes to ensure that requests are routed to healthy instances.

  • Metadata Store (MySQL, PostgreSQL, etc.)

    • Responsibilities: Stores Druid's metadata.
    • STRIDE (Focus on Druid's interaction):
      • Tampering: An attacker with access to the database could modify Druid's metadata, leading to data loss, corruption, or misconfiguration.
      • Information Disclosure: Unauthorized access to the metadata could reveal information about the Druid cluster, datasources, and segments.
      • Denial of Service: Attacking the metadata store could make the entire Druid cluster unavailable.
    • Mitigation:
      • Database Security Best Practices: Follow standard database security best practices, including strong authentication, authorization, encryption at rest and in transit, regular patching, and auditing.
      • Least Privilege: Grant Druid's database user only the minimum necessary permissions.
      • Network Segmentation: Isolate the metadata store database from other systems.
      • Regular Backups: Implement regular backups of the metadata store to ensure data recovery in case of failure or attack.
      • Connection Security: Use secure connections (e.g., TLS) between Druid nodes and the metadata store.

  • Deep Storage (S3, HDFS, etc.)

    • Responsibilities: Stores Druid segments persistently.
    • STRIDE (Focus on Druid's interaction):
      • Tampering: An attacker with access to the deep storage could modify or delete Druid segments, leading to data loss or corruption.
      • Information Disclosure: Unauthorized access to the deep storage could expose sensitive data.
    • Mitigation:
      • Deep Storage Security Best Practices: Follow the security best practices of the specific deep storage system (e.g., S3 server-side encryption, IAM roles, access controls, HDFS encryption, Kerberos authentication).
      • Least Privilege: Grant Druid only the minimum necessary permissions to access and write to deep storage.
      • Regular Backups: Implement a separate backup and recovery strategy for data stored in deep storage.
      • Object Versioning (if supported): Enable object versioning (e.g., in S3) to protect against accidental deletion or modification.

  • Data Sources (Kafka, Kinesis, Files, etc.)

    • Responsibilities: Provides data for ingestion.
    • STRIDE (Focus on Druid's interaction):
      • Tampering: An attacker could inject malicious data into the data source, which would then be ingested by Druid.
      • Information Disclosure: If the data source contains sensitive data, unauthorized access could lead to a data breach.
      • Denial of Service: Attacking the data source could prevent Druid from ingesting new data.
    • Mitigation:
      • Data Source Security Best Practices: Follow the security best practices of the specific data source (e.g., Kafka authentication and authorization, secure file access controls).
      • Input Validation (in Druid): As mentioned earlier, thoroughly validate all data ingested by Druid, regardless of the source.
      • Secure Communication: Use secure protocols (e.g., TLS) and authentication when communicating with data sources.

3. Interaction Analysis and Data Flow

The C4 diagrams provided are excellent for understanding the interactions. Key areas of concern:

  • Client -> Broker -> Historical/MiddleManager: This is the primary query path. Authentication and authorization are crucial at the Broker. Input validation is essential to prevent SQL injection and other attacks. TLS should be used for all communication.
  • MiddleManager -> Peon: The MiddleManager controls Peon tasks. Task isolation and resource limits are critical to prevent Peons from compromising the MiddleManager or other parts of the system.
  • Peon -> Data Sources: This is where data enters Druid. Input validation and secure communication with data sources are essential.
  • Coordinator/Overlord -> Metadata Store: These nodes manage Druid's metadata. Secure access to the metadata store is crucial to prevent data loss, corruption, or misconfiguration.
  • Historical -> Deep Storage: Historical nodes read data segments from deep storage. Secure access to deep storage is essential to prevent data breaches.
  • Router -> (Broker, Coordinator, Overlord): The router acts as a single point of entry. TLS and potentially mTLS are crucial for securing this component.

4. Vulnerability Identification (Specific Examples)

Based on the analysis above, here are some specific vulnerabilities that could exist:

  • VULN-1: SQL Injection: If the Broker node doesn't properly validate SQL queries, an attacker could inject malicious SQL code to access or modify data.
  • VULN-2: Unauthenticated Access: If authentication is not enforced or is misconfigured, an attacker could access Druid's web console or API endpoints without credentials.
  • VULN-3: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): If user-supplied data is not properly sanitized, an attacker could inject malicious JavaScript code into the Druid web console.
  • VULN-4: Data Tampering in Deep Storage: If an attacker gains access to the deep storage system (e.g., S3), they could modify or delete Druid segments, leading to data loss or corruption.
  • VULN-5: Metadata Store Compromise: If an attacker gains access to the metadata store database, they could modify Druid's metadata, potentially causing data loss, corruption, or misconfiguration.
  • VULN-6: Peon Task Resource Exhaustion: A malicious or poorly configured Peon task could consume excessive resources (CPU, memory, disk I/O), leading to a denial-of-service condition.
  • VULN-7: Insecure Deserialization: If Druid uses insecure deserialization libraries or practices, an attacker could exploit this to execute arbitrary code.
  • VULN-8: Extension Vulnerabilities: Custom Druid extensions could contain vulnerabilities that could be exploited to compromise the cluster.
  • VULN-9: Dependency Vulnerabilities: Druid depends on numerous third-party libraries. If these libraries have known vulnerabilities, an attacker could exploit them.
  • VULN-10: Lack of Rate Limiting: Without rate limiting, an attacker could overwhelm Druid with a large number of requests, leading to a denial-of-service condition.
  • VULN-11: Insufficient Auditing: If auditing is not enabled or is not comprehensive, it will be difficult to detect and investigate security incidents.
  • VULN-12: Information Disclosure via Error Messages: Overly verbose error messages could reveal sensitive information about the Druid cluster or the data it stores.
  • VULN-13: Unencrypted Communication: If TLS is not used for all communication, an attacker could intercept sensitive data in transit.
  • VULN-14: Default Credentials: If default credentials are not changed, an attacker could easily gain access to the system.

5. Mitigation Strategies (Actionable and Tailored)

The mitigation strategies listed for each component in Section 2 address many of these vulnerabilities. Here's a summary of key mitigation strategies, organized by vulnerability:

  • VULN-1 (SQL Injection):

    • Use parameterized queries or prepared statements.
    • Implement strict input validation and sanitization.
    • Use a web application firewall (WAF) to detect and block SQL injection attempts.

  • VULN-2 (Unauthenticated Access):

    • Enforce strong authentication for all users and services.
    • Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) where possible.
    • Regularly review and update authentication configurations.

  • VULN-3 (XSS):

    • Sanitize all user-supplied data to remove potentially harmful characters or scripts.
    • Use a content security policy (CSP) to restrict the sources from which scripts can be loaded.
    • Use a WAF to detect and block XSS attempts.

  • VULN-4 (Data Tampering in Deep Storage):

    • Use the security features of the underlying deep storage system (e.g., S3 server-side encryption, IAM roles, access controls).
    • Implement regular backups and a disaster recovery plan.
    • Enable object versioning (if supported).

  • VULN-5 (Metadata Store Compromise):

    • Follow database security best practices.
    • Use strong passwords and regularly rotate them.
    • Implement regular backups.
    • Grant Druid's database user only the minimum necessary permissions.

  • VULN-6 (Peon Task Resource Exhaustion):

    • Run Peon tasks in isolated environments (containers, sandboxes).
    • Strictly enforce resource limits for Peon tasks.

  • VULN-7 (Insecure Deserialization):

    • Avoid using insecure deserialization libraries or practices.
    • Use a whitelist of allowed classes for deserialization.
    • Implement integrity checks on serialized data.

  • VULN-8 (Extension Vulnerabilities):

    • Thoroughly vet and security-test any custom extensions before deploying them.
    • Regularly update extensions to address any security vulnerabilities.
    • Consider using a sandbox environment for running extensions.

  • VULN-9 (Dependency Vulnerabilities):

    • Use a software composition analysis (SCA) tool to identify and mitigate known vulnerabilities in third-party libraries.
    • Regularly update dependencies to the latest secure versions.

  • VULN-10 (Lack of Rate Limiting):

    • Implement rate limiting on all API endpoints and web interfaces.

  • VULN-11 (Insufficient Auditing):

    • Enable comprehensive auditing for all Druid components.
    • Regularly review audit logs to detect and investigate security incidents.
    • Consider using a centralized logging and monitoring system.

  • VULN-12 (Information Disclosure via Error Messages):

    • Configure Druid to return generic error messages to users.
    • Log detailed error information internally for debugging purposes.

  • VULN-13 (Unencrypted Communication):

    • Use TLS for all communication between Druid components and clients.
    • Use strong cipher suites and regularly update TLS configurations.

  • VULN-14 (Default Credentials):

    • Change all default credentials immediately after installation.
    • Use strong, unique passwords for all accounts.

Build Process Security

The build process security considerations outlined in the design document are good. Key takeaways and additions:

  • Dependency Management: Use OWASP Dependency-Check or a similar tool to automatically scan for vulnerable dependencies during the build process. Fail the build if high-severity vulnerabilities are found.
  • Static Analysis: Integrate static analysis tools (FindBugs, PMD, SonarQube) into the CI pipeline to identify potential code quality and security issues.
  • Artifact Signing: Sign all released artifacts (JARs, packages) with a GPG key to ensure their integrity and authenticity. Publish the public key so users can verify the signatures.
  • Secure Build Environment: Ensure the build environment itself is secure (e.g., use a dedicated build server, restrict access to the build system).
  • Reproducible Builds: Aim for reproducible builds, so that anyone can independently verify that a given build artifact was produced from a specific source code revision.

This deep analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the security considerations for Apache Druid. By implementing the recommended mitigation strategies, organizations can significantly reduce the risk of security incidents and ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of their data and analytics infrastructure. Remember that security is an ongoing process, and regular reviews and updates are essential to maintain a strong security posture.