Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
38 lines (31 loc) · 5.61 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

38 lines (31 loc) · 5.61 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for apache/commons-codec

Attack Surface: Injection Vulnerabilities Enabled by Decoded Data

  • Description: Applications using commons-codec to decode data (e.g., Base64, URL encoding) can become vulnerable to injection attacks if the decoded data is used in sensitive contexts without proper sanitization. commons-codec's decoding functions are a necessary step in realizing this attack vector.
  • Commons-Codec Contribution: commons-codec provides the decoding functions (like Base64.decode(), URLDecoder.decode()) that transform encoded input into a usable string format. This decoded string, if maliciously crafted and unsanitized, becomes the injection payload.
  • Example: An application decodes URL-encoded user input using URLDecoder.decode() from commons-codec and then directly uses this decoded string in an SQL query. An attacker can inject malicious SQL code within the URL-encoded input, which after being decoded by commons-codec, is executed as part of the SQL query.
  • Impact: SQL Injection, Command Injection, Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), depending on how the decoded data is used by the application.
  • Risk Severity: High (can be Critical depending on the injection type and application context)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Output Encoding: Always encode decoded data appropriately for the context where it is used. Use parameterized queries for SQL, HTML encoding for web output, and secure command construction practices.
    • Input Validation (Decoded Data): Validate the decoded data to ensure it conforms to expected patterns and does not contain malicious content, in addition to validating the encoded input.
    • Principle of Least Privilege: Limit the privileges of the application components that handle decoded data to minimize the impact of successful injection attacks.

Attack Surface: Algorithm Weaknesses in Digest Implementations

  • Description: commons-codec provides implementations of cryptographic hash functions, including weak algorithms like MD5 and SHA-1. Using these weak algorithms from commons-codec for security-sensitive operations introduces a high risk of cryptographic compromise.
  • Commons-Codec Contribution: commons-codec directly provides the vulnerable implementations of digest algorithms (e.g., DigestUtils.md5Hex(), DigestUtils.sha1Hex()). Choosing to use these functions directly exposes the application to the inherent weaknesses of these algorithms.
  • Example: An application uses DigestUtils.md5Hex() from commons-codec to hash passwords. MD5 is known to be vulnerable to collision attacks and rainbow table attacks. Attackers can exploit these weaknesses to potentially bypass authentication or recover passwords.
  • Impact: Authentication Bypass, Data Integrity Compromise, Password Cracking.
  • Risk Severity: High (if used for password hashing or critical integrity checks)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Use Stronger Algorithms: For security-sensitive hashing, exclusively use stronger, modern cryptographic hash functions like SHA-256, SHA-384, or SHA-512. commons-codec also provides implementations of these stronger algorithms (e.g., DigestUtils.sha256Hex()).
    • Deprecate and Migrate: Identify and replace all usages of weak algorithms like MD5 and SHA-1 in the application code.
    • Salt Hashing (Password Storage): When hashing passwords, always use strong, unique salts in conjunction with strong hash algorithms to further mitigate password attacks.

Attack Surface: Potential Implementation Bugs within Commons-Codec Library

  • Description: As with any software, commons-codec may contain implementation bugs that could be exploited. While less frequent in a mature library, undiscovered vulnerabilities within commons-codec's code represent a potential high-risk attack surface.
  • Commons-Codec Contribution: commons-codec is the source of the code being executed. Any bugs within its encoding, decoding, or digest algorithm implementations are directly exploitable when the library is used by an application.
  • Example: (Hypothetical) A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in a specific version of commons-codec's Base64.decode() function. A crafted Base64 string could be designed to trigger this overflow when decoded using commons-codec, potentially leading to denial of service or, in more severe scenarios, code execution.
  • Impact: Denial of Service (DoS), Memory Corruption, potentially Remote Code Execution (in highly severe bug scenarios).
  • Risk Severity: High (due to potential for significant impact from code-level bugs in a core library)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Stay Updated: Maintain commons-codec at the latest stable version. Regularly update to benefit from security patches and bug fixes released by the Apache Commons project.
    • Monitor Security Advisories: Actively monitor security mailing lists, vulnerability databases (like CVE), and the Apache Commons project's security announcements for any reported vulnerabilities in commons-codec.
    • Consider Static Analysis (Application Code): While you cannot fix bugs in commons-codec directly, static analysis tools applied to your application code can help identify potentially risky usage patterns of commons-codec that might interact with known or future bugs in the library.