Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation and Sanitization for File Paths
-
Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation and Sanitization for File Paths
-
Description:
- Identify Input Points: Locate all places in the application where file paths are received as input and are subsequently used with Commons IO functions (e.g., in file upload handlers, API endpoints for file access, configuration loading).
- Implement Validation Rules: Define strict validation rules for file paths before they are passed to Commons IO functions. This includes:
- Allowed Characters: Restrict characters to a safe set (alphanumeric, limited symbols) and disallow potentially dangerous characters like
..
, backslashes, or colons if not explicitly needed. - Path Length Limits: Enforce maximum path length to prevent potential buffer overflows or DoS through excessively long paths processed by Commons IO.
- File Extension Whitelisting: If the application only handles specific file types, validate file extensions against a whitelist before using Commons IO to process them.
- Allowed Characters: Restrict characters to a safe set (alphanumeric, limited symbols) and disallow potentially dangerous characters like
- Sanitize Input: Sanitize file paths before using them with Commons IO:
- Remove Malicious Components: Strip out potentially harmful path components like
../
or absolute path prefixes if relative paths are expected for Commons IO operations. - Normalize Path Separators: Ensure consistent path separators (forward slashes or backslashes as needed) before Commons IO processes the path.
- Remove Malicious Components: Strip out potentially harmful path components like
- Apply Validation Before Commons IO Usage: Crucially, perform all validation and sanitization steps before passing the file path to any Commons IO function like
FileUtils.readFileToString
,FileUtils.copyFile
, etc. - Error Handling: If validation fails, reject the input before any Commons IO operation is attempted and provide informative error messages.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Path Traversal (High Severity): Prevents attackers from manipulating file paths to access files or directories outside of the intended scope when using Commons IO file access functions.
-
Impact:
- Path Traversal: High reduction. Effectively prevents path traversal vulnerabilities arising from improper use of Commons IO file path handling.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Implemented in:
- File Upload Module: Input validation is implemented in the
FileUploadHandler
class before using Commons IO to save uploaded files. - API Endpoint for File Download: Input validation is present in the
FileDownloadController
class before using Commons IO to serve files.
- File Upload Module: Input validation is implemented in the
- Implemented in:
-
Missing Implementation:
- Missing in:
- Configuration File Parsing: File paths read from configuration files and used with Commons IO are currently not validated. Validation should be added in
ConfigurationLoader
class before using these paths with Commons IO. - Internal File Processing Jobs: Some background jobs using Commons IO to process files based on database entries lack explicit path validation. Validation needs to be added in
BackgroundFileProcessor
class before using Commons IO functions.
- Configuration File Parsing: File paths read from configuration files and used with Commons IO are currently not validated. Validation should be added in
- Missing in:
-
Mitigation Strategy: Canonicalization of File Paths
-
Mitigation Strategy: Canonicalization of File Paths
-
Description:
- Obtain Canonical Path: After initial validation and sanitization of the input file path, use
File.getCanonicalPath()
(orPaths.get(path).toRealPath()
for NIO.2) to get the canonical form of the path before using it with Commons IO. - Compare Canonical Paths (if needed): If necessary, compare the canonical path with allowed base directories to ensure it remains within permitted boundaries, even after path resolution, before using it with Commons IO.
- Use Canonical Path in Commons IO: Always use the canonical path obtained in step 1 in all subsequent Commons IO operations instead of the original, potentially manipulated, user-provided path.
- Obtain Canonical Path: After initial validation and sanitization of the input file path, use
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Path Traversal (High Severity): Mitigates path traversal attempts that bypass basic validation by using symbolic links, relative path components (
.
,..
), or inconsistent path representations when interacting with Commons IO file functions.
- Path Traversal (High Severity): Mitigates path traversal attempts that bypass basic validation by using symbolic links, relative path components (
-
Impact:
- Path Traversal: High reduction. Significantly strengthens path traversal defenses when using Commons IO by ensuring consistent and resolved path interpretation.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Implemented in:
- File Download Service: Canonicalization is used in the
FileDownloadService
class before using Commons IO to access and serve files.
- File Download Service: Canonicalization is used in the
- Implemented in:
-
Missing Implementation:
- Missing in:
- File Processing API: Canonicalization is not consistently applied in all API endpoints that process file paths using Commons IO, specifically in
FileProcessingAPIController
. - Temporary File Handling: Canonicalization is not used when creating or accessing temporary files with Commons IO utilities, potentially leading to issues if temporary file paths are derived from user input and then used with Commons IO. Needs implementation in
TempFileManager
class.
- File Processing API: Canonicalization is not consistently applied in all API endpoints that process file paths using Commons IO, specifically in
- Missing in:
-
Mitigation Strategy: Resource Limits for File Operations using Commons IO
-
Mitigation Strategy: Resource Limits for File Operations using Commons IO
-
Description:
- Define File Size Limits: Determine appropriate maximum file size limits for file uploads, processing, and downloads that involve Commons IO functions, based on application resources and expected usage.
- Implement Size Checks Before Commons IO Operations: Before using Commons IO functions that process file content (e.g.,
FileUtils.readFileToByteArray
,FileUtils.copyInputStreamToFile
), check the file size.- For file uploads, check
Content-Length
or monitor size during streaming before passing to Commons IO. - For existing files, use
File.length()
before using Commons IO to read or copy them.
- For file uploads, check
- Reject Exceeding Files (Before Commons IO): If a file exceeds the size limit, reject the operation before any resource-intensive Commons IO operation is initiated. Return an error and log the event.
- Streaming with Commons IO for Large Files: When dealing with potentially large files using Commons IO, prefer streaming approaches (e.g.,
IOUtils.copy
) instead of loading entire files into memory with functions likeFileUtils.readFileToByteArray
.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Denial of Service (DoS) (High Severity): Prevents attackers from causing DoS by submitting excessively large files that could exhaust server resources (memory, disk space, processing time) when processed by Commons IO functions.
-
Impact:
- DoS: High reduction. Effectively mitigates file-size based DoS attacks related to Commons IO usage by limiting resource consumption.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Implemented in:
- File Upload Endpoint: File size limits are enforced in the
FileUploadEndpoint
before using Commons IO to handle uploaded files.
- File Upload Endpoint: File size limits are enforced in the
- Implemented in:
-
Missing Implementation:
- Missing in:
- Batch File Processing: Batch jobs using Commons IO to process files from external sources do not currently have file size limits, making them potentially vulnerable to DoS. Needs implementation in
BatchProcessorService
before using Commons IO. - File Preview Generation: File preview generation using Commons IO might process large files without size limits, impacting performance. Limits should be added in
PreviewGenerator
class before using Commons IO.
- Batch File Processing: Batch jobs using Commons IO to process files from external sources do not currently have file size limits, making them potentially vulnerable to DoS. Needs implementation in
- Missing in:
-
Mitigation Strategy: Timeouts for File Operations with Commons IO
-
Mitigation Strategy: Timeouts for File Operations with Commons IO
-
Description:
- Identify Time-Sensitive Commons IO Operations: Pinpoint Commons IO operations that might be long-running, especially those involving network resources, slow file systems, or external dependencies, and could be exploited for DoS.
- Implement Timeouts for Commons IO Operations: Configure timeouts for these operations. Since many Commons IO functions are synchronous, you might need to implement timeouts programmatically, for example:
- Using
ExecutorService
with timeouts to execute Commons IO operations asynchronously. - Wrapping Commons IO operations with
Future
and usingget(timeout, TimeUnit)
to enforce timeouts.
- Using
- Handle Timeouts Gracefully: When a timeout occurs during a Commons IO operation, handle the
TimeoutException
gracefully. Release resources, log the timeout, and return an appropriate error response, preventing application hangs caused by slow Commons IO operations.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Denial of Service (DoS) (Medium Severity): Prevents attackers from causing application hangs or resource exhaustion by initiating Commons IO file operations that take an excessively long time, especially when targeting slow or unresponsive external resources.
-
Impact:
- DoS: Moderate reduction. Reduces the impact of time-based DoS attacks related to Commons IO by preventing indefinite waits and ensuring timely resource release when using Commons IO.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Implemented in:
- Remote File Access Service: Timeouts are configured for network operations within the
RemoteFileAccessor
service when using Commons IO to access remote files.
- Remote File Access Service: Timeouts are configured for network operations within the
- Implemented in:
-
Missing Implementation:
- Missing in:
- File Conversion Service: File conversion processes using Commons IO and potentially external libraries lack explicit timeouts, potentially leading to hangs if conversions take too long. Timeouts should be added in
FileConverterService
for Commons IO operations. - Backup Operations: Backup processes using Commons IO to copy files to network storage might be vulnerable to timeouts if network connectivity is slow. Timeouts should be implemented in
BackupManager
class for Commons IO file copy operations.
- File Conversion Service: File conversion processes using Commons IO and potentially external libraries lack explicit timeouts, potentially leading to hangs if conversions take too long. Timeouts should be added in
- Missing in:
-
Mitigation Strategy: Secure Temporary File Handling with Commons IO Utilities
-
Mitigation Strategy: Secure Temporary File Handling with Commons IO Utilities
-
Description:
- Use Secure Temporary Directory (with Commons IO): When using Commons IO to get temporary directories (e.g.,
FileUtils.getTempDirectory()
), ensure the application is configured to use a secure system temporary directory with restricted permissions. - Restrict Temporary File Permissions (if creating with Commons IO): If creating temporary files using Commons IO or related Java APIs, set restrictive permissions to prevent unauthorized access. Use
File.setReadable(false, false)
,File.setWritable(false, false)
, andFile.setExecutable(false, false)
as needed to limit access to the file owner. - Secure Naming Conventions (if creating with Commons IO): When creating temporary files, especially using Commons IO utilities, ensure unique and unpredictable names are used to reduce the risk of predictable file paths. Commons IO's interaction with
File.createTempFile()
helps with this. - Immediate Deletion (after Commons IO usage): Delete temporary files as soon as they are no longer needed after being used by Commons IO operations. Use
File.delete()
orFiles.delete()
for immediate deletion. - Avoid
deleteOnExit()
for Sensitive Data (with Commons IO): Avoid relying solely onFile.deleteOnExit()
for sensitive temporary files managed by Commons IO, as it's not always reliable. Implement explicit deletion logic after Commons IO operations are complete.
- Use Secure Temporary Directory (with Commons IO): When using Commons IO to get temporary directories (e.g.,
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Information Disclosure (Medium Severity): Insecure temporary file handling, especially when using Commons IO for temporary file management, can lead to sensitive data exposure if temporary files are created with weak permissions or not properly deleted after Commons IO operations, allowing unauthorized access.
-
Impact:
- Information Disclosure: Moderate reduction. Significantly reduces the risk of information disclosure through temporary files created or managed using Commons IO by ensuring secure creation, access control, and timely deletion after Commons IO operations.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Implemented in:
- Image Processing Module: Temporary files created and managed by Commons IO during image processing in
ImageProcessor
class useFile.createTempFile()
and are deleted immediately after Commons IO processing.
- Image Processing Module: Temporary files created and managed by Commons IO during image processing in
- Implemented in:
-
Missing Implementation:
- Missing in:
- Report Generation Service: Temporary files generated by
ReportService
and potentially managed with Commons IO might not have restrictive permissions and rely ondeleteOnExit()
. Permissions hardening and explicit deletion after Commons IO usage are needed. - Data Export Feature: Temporary files used for data export in
DataExporter
class and potentially handled by Commons IO need review to ensure secure temporary file handling practices are consistently applied, especially regarding permissions and deletion after Commons IO operations.
- Report Generation Service: Temporary files generated by
- Missing in:
-
Mitigation Strategy: Keep Commons IO Updated
-
Mitigation Strategy: Keep Commons IO Updated
-
Description:
- Monitor for Updates: Regularly monitor for new releases and security advisories for Apache Commons IO on the official Apache Commons website and security mailing lists.
- Update Dependencies: Use a dependency management tool (like Maven or Gradle) to manage project dependencies. Regularly update the Commons IO dependency to the latest stable version.
- Test After Updates: After updating Commons IO, perform thorough testing to ensure compatibility and that the update has not introduced any regressions in application functionality that uses Commons IO.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Known Vulnerabilities in Commons IO (Severity Varies): Outdated versions of Commons IO may contain known security vulnerabilities that attackers can exploit. Updating mitigates these known risks.
-
Impact:
- Known Vulnerabilities: High reduction. Directly addresses known vulnerabilities in Commons IO by applying patches and fixes included in newer versions.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Implemented in:
- Dependency Management Process: The project uses Maven for dependency management, and there is a process to check for dependency updates quarterly.
- Implemented in:
-
Missing Implementation:
- Missing in:
- Automated Dependency Checks: Automated tools for dependency vulnerability scanning and update notifications are not fully integrated into the CI/CD pipeline. This should be implemented to proactively identify and address outdated Commons IO versions.
- Missing in:
-
Mitigation Strategy: Code Reviews Focusing on Commons IO Usage
-
Mitigation Strategy: Code Reviews Focusing on Commons IO Usage
-
Description:
- Include Commons IO in Code Review Scope: When conducting code reviews, specifically include a focus on how Apache Commons IO is used in the code.
- Review for Security Best Practices: Reviewers should specifically look for:
- Proper input validation and sanitization of file paths before using Commons IO.
- Correct canonicalization of paths when needed before Commons IO operations.
- Implementation of resource limits and timeouts for Commons IO operations.
- Secure temporary file handling practices when using Commons IO utilities.
- General secure coding practices related to file I/O in the context of Commons IO usage.
- Security Expertise in Reviews: Ensure that code reviewers have sufficient security awareness to identify potential vulnerabilities related to file handling and Commons IO usage.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- All Commons IO Related Threats (Severity Varies): Proactive code reviews can identify and prevent a wide range of vulnerabilities related to improper or insecure usage of Commons IO before they are deployed.
-
Impact:
- All Commons IO Related Threats: Moderate to High reduction. Code reviews act as a preventative measure, catching potential issues early in the development lifecycle.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Implemented in:
- Code Review Process: Code reviews are mandatory for all code changes, but the reviews do not explicitly focus on Commons IO usage or file handling security in every review.
- Implemented in:
-
Missing Implementation:
- Missing in:
- Specific Checklists/Guidelines for Commons IO Reviews: Develop and implement specific checklists or guidelines for code reviewers to ensure they explicitly check for secure Commons IO usage during code reviews.
- Missing in:
-
Mitigation Strategy: Static Application Security Testing (SAST) for Commons IO Usage
-
Mitigation Strategy: Static Application Security Testing (SAST) for Commons IO Usage
-
Description:
- Integrate SAST Tools: Integrate Static Application Security Testing (SAST) tools into the development pipeline (e.g., CI/CD).
- Configure SAST for File Handling Rules: Configure the SAST tools to specifically check for common security vulnerabilities related to file handling and path manipulation, including those relevant to Commons IO usage (e.g., path traversal patterns, insecure temporary file creation).
- Regular SAST Scans: Run SAST scans regularly (e.g., on each code commit or nightly builds) to automatically detect potential vulnerabilities in the codebase related to Commons IO.
- Remediate SAST Findings: Actively review and remediate findings reported by SAST tools related to Commons IO usage, prioritizing high and medium severity issues.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Path Traversal, Information Disclosure, DoS (Severity Varies): SAST tools can automatically detect code patterns that are indicative of potential path traversal, information disclosure through insecure temporary files, and DoS vulnerabilities related to file handling and Commons IO usage.
-
Impact:
- Path Traversal, Information Disclosure, DoS: Moderate to High reduction. SAST provides automated vulnerability detection, helping to identify and address issues early in the development cycle.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Implemented in:
- CI/CD Pipeline: SAST tools are integrated into the CI/CD pipeline and run on each pull request.
- Implemented in:
-
Missing Implementation:
- Missing in:
- Custom SAST Rules for Commons IO Specific Vulnerabilities: Explore and implement custom SAST rules or configurations that are specifically tailored to detect vulnerabilities related to common insecure patterns of Commons IO usage. This could improve the accuracy and relevance of SAST findings for Commons IO.
- Missing in:
-