Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
88 lines (76 loc) · 7.54 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

88 lines (76 loc) · 7.54 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for apache/dubbo

Objective: Compromise Dubbo Application

Attack Tree Visualization

Attack Goal: Compromise Dubbo Application [CRITICAL NODE] └───[AND] Exploit Dubbo Specific Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] ├───[OR] 1. Compromise Registry [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ └─── 1.2. Registry Poisoning/Manipulation [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ ├─── 1.2.1. Unauthorized Registry Access [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ └───[AND] Exploit Weak Registry Authentication/Authorization │ ├─── 1.2.2. Inject Malicious Service Registration [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ └───[AND] Bypass Service Registration Validation & Inject Malicious Provider Address │ └─── 1.2.3. Modify Existing Service Registration [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ └───[AND] Bypass Service Registration Validation & Modify Provider Address to Attacker Controlled Server └───[OR] 2. Exploit Provider Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH] ├─── 2.1. Deserialization Vulnerabilities in RPC Protocol [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ └─── 2.1.1. Exploit Insecure Serialization Library (e.g., Hessian, Kryo) [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ └───[AND] Identify Serialization Library & Send Malicious Payload ├─── 2.2. Service Implementation Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ └───[AND] Identify Service Endpoints & Exploit Application Logic Flaws (e.g., Injection, Logic Bugs) └─── 2.3. Provider Misconfiguration [HIGH-RISK PATH] ├─── 2.3.1. Unsecured Provider Access [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ └───[AND] Identify Exposed Provider Ports & Access Directly └─── 2.3.2. Weak Provider Authentication/Authorization [HIGH-RISK PATH] └───[AND] Bypass Provider Authentication & Invoke Services

Attack Tree Path: 1. Compromise Registry [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Critical Node Justification: The registry is the central nervous system of a Dubbo application. Compromising it allows attackers to manipulate service discovery, redirect traffic, and potentially take over the entire application.

  • High-Risk Path Justification: Registry misconfigurations and vulnerabilities are relatively common, and the impact of a successful registry compromise is critical.

    • 1.2. Registry Poisoning/Manipulation [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Attack Vector: Attackers aim to manipulate the service registry to redirect consumers to malicious providers or disrupt service discovery.
      • Breakdown:
        • 1.2.1. Unauthorized Registry Access [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
          • Attack Vector: Exploiting weak or default credentials, or authorization bypasses to gain access to the registry management interface or API.
          • Actionable Insights:
            • Implement strong authentication and authorization for registry access.
            • Regularly audit registry access controls.
        • 1.2.2. Inject Malicious Service Registration [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
          • Attack Vector: Registering a malicious service provider with the registry, impersonating a legitimate service.
          • Actionable Insights:
            • Implement service registration validation mechanisms.
            • Monitor service registrations for anomalies.
        • 1.2.3. Modify Existing Service Registration [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
          • Attack Vector: Modifying the address of a legitimate service registration to point to an attacker-controlled server.
          • Actionable Insights:
            • Implement strong authorization for modifying service registrations.
            • Regularly audit service registrations for unauthorized changes.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Exploit Provider Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Critical Node Justification: Providers are the components that execute the core application logic. Compromising a provider can lead to data breaches, service disruption, and remote code execution.

  • High-Risk Path Justification: Provider vulnerabilities, especially deserialization flaws and application logic bugs, are frequently exploited and have a significant impact.

    • 2.1. Deserialization Vulnerabilities in RPC Protocol [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]:

      • Critical Node Justification: Deserialization vulnerabilities are a well-known and highly dangerous class of vulnerabilities that can lead to immediate remote code execution.
      • High-Risk Path Justification: Dubbo's reliance on serialization for RPC communication makes it susceptible to deserialization attacks, especially if insecure serialization libraries are used.
        • 2.1.1. Exploit Insecure Serialization Library (e.g., Hessian, Kryo) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
          • Attack Vector: Exploiting known deserialization vulnerabilities in libraries like Hessian or Kryo by sending malicious serialized payloads to the provider.
          • Actionable Insights:
            • Avoid using vulnerable serialization libraries if possible.
            • If using them, keep them updated and implement mitigations like input validation (though often bypassed in deserialization attacks) and consider whitelisting.

    • 2.2. Service Implementation Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH]:

      • Attack Vector: Exploiting common web application vulnerabilities (e.g., injection flaws, logic bugs, authentication bypasses) within the service implementation code exposed through Dubbo.
      • Actionable Insights:
        • Apply secure coding practices in service implementations.
        • Conduct thorough security testing, including penetration testing and code reviews.
        • Implement robust input validation and output encoding.

    • 2.3. Provider Misconfiguration [HIGH-RISK PATH]:

      • Attack Vector: Exploiting misconfigurations in the Dubbo provider setup that expose it to unnecessary risks.
      • High-Risk Path Justification: Misconfigurations are common and easily exploitable, leading to direct access or weakened security.
        • 2.3.1. Unsecured Provider Access [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
          • Attack Vector: Provider ports are exposed to the public internet or untrusted networks without proper access control.
          • Actionable Insights:
            • Ensure providers are not directly accessible from the public internet unless absolutely necessary.
            • Use network segmentation and firewalls to restrict access.
        • 2.3.2. Weak Provider Authentication/Authorization [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
          • Attack Vector: Provider authentication or authorization mechanisms are weak, default, or bypassed, allowing unauthorized access to services.
          • Actionable Insights:
            • Enable and enforce strong authentication and authorization for Dubbo providers.
            • Use Dubbo's security features to configure authentication mechanisms.
            • Implement fine-grained authorization controls.