Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
122 lines (108 loc) · 8.89 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

122 lines (108 loc) · 8.89 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for apache/dubbo

Objective: To achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) on a Dubbo consumer or provider, or to disrupt the service availability (Denial of Service - DoS) of the Dubbo-based application. RCE is the primary goal.

Attack Tree Visualization

                                     +-------------------------------------+
                                     |  Compromise Dubbo Application (RCE/DoS) |
                                     +-------------------------------------+
                                                  |
         +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
         |                                                |                               |
+---------------------+                      +---------------------+         +---------------------+
|  Exploit Provider   |                      |  Exploit Consumer   |         |  Exploit Registry   |
+---------------------+                      +---------------------+         +---------------------+
         |                                                |                               |
+--------+--------+                      +--------+--------+         +--------+--------+
|                 |                      |                 |         |  Registry Poisoning |
| Deserialization |                      | Deserialization |         |    [CRITICAL]       |
| Vulnerabilities |                      | Vulnerabilities |         +--------+--------+
+--------+--------+                      +--------+--------+                  |
         |                                                |             +--------+--------+
+--------+--------+                      +--------+--------+         |  [HIGH RISK]      |
|  [HIGH RISK]    |                      |  [HIGH RISK]    |         |  Fake Provider   |
|  Hessian2       |                      |  Hessian2       |         |  Registration   |
|  Exploits       |                      |  Exploits       |         +--------+--------+
|    [CRITICAL]   |                      |    [CRITICAL]   |
+--------+--------+                      +--------+--------+
         |                                                |
+--------+--------+                      +--------+--------+
|  [HIGH RISK]    |                      |  [HIGH RISK]    |
|  Java            |                      |  Java            |
|  Deserialization|                      |  Deserialization|
|  Gadgets         |                      |  Gadgets         |
|    [CRITICAL]   |                      |    [CRITICAL]   |
+--------+--------+                      +--------+--------+
         |                                                |
+--------+--------+                      +--------+--------+
|  [HIGH RISK]    |                      |  [HIGH RISK]    |
|  Fastjson        |                      |  Fastjson        |
|  Exploits       |                      |  Exploits       |
|    [CRITICAL]   |                      |    [CRITICAL]   |
+--------+--------+                      +--------+--------+
         |                                                |
+--------+--------+                      +--------+--------+
|Unauthenticated |                      |Unauthenticated |
|Access/Bypass   |                      |Access/Bypass   |
|(Telnet, HTTP)  |                      |(Telnet, HTTP)  |
|   [CRITICAL]    |                      |   [CRITICAL]    |
+--------+--------+                      +--------+--------+

Attack Tree Path: Hessian2 Exploits ([HIGH RISK], [CRITICAL])

  • Description: Exploits vulnerabilities in the Hessian2 serialization protocol. Attackers craft malicious serialized objects that, when deserialized by the Dubbo provider or consumer, execute arbitrary code.
  • Likelihood: High (if using a vulnerable version and exposed to untrusted input) / Medium (if using a patched version but with weak input validation)
  • Impact: Very High (RCE)
  • Effort: Medium (finding and exploiting a known vulnerability) / High (discovering and exploiting a 0-day)
  • Skill Level: Intermediate (using existing exploits) / Expert (finding new vulnerabilities)
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium (if using standard security monitoring) / Hard (if the attacker is careful to avoid triggering alerts)
  • Mitigation:
    • Use the latest, patched version of Hessian2.
    • Avoid deserializing data from untrusted sources.
    • Implement strict whitelisting of allowed classes during deserialization.
    • Perform rigorous input validation before deserialization.

Attack Tree Path: Java Deserialization Gadgets ([HIGH RISK], [CRITICAL])

  • Description: Exploits Java's built-in serialization mechanism. Attackers leverage "gadget" classes present in the application's classpath to chain together a sequence of operations that ultimately lead to RCE during deserialization.
  • Likelihood: Medium (depends on the presence of vulnerable gadgets in the classpath)
  • Impact: Very High (RCE)
  • Effort: Medium (finding and chaining gadgets) / High (discovering new gadget chains)
  • Skill Level: Intermediate (using known gadget chains) / Expert (finding new gadget chains)
  • Detection Difficulty: Hard (often requires deep inspection of serialized data and application behavior)
  • Mitigation:
    • Avoid using Java's built-in serialization if possible.
    • If unavoidable, implement strict whitelisting of allowed classes.
    • Carefully manage dependencies to avoid including libraries with known vulnerable gadgets.
    • Use security tools that can detect and prevent gadget chain exploits.

Attack Tree Path: Fastjson Exploits ([HIGH RISK], [CRITICAL])

  • Description: Exploits vulnerabilities in the Fastjson library, a popular JSON library that may be used by Dubbo or its dependencies. Similar to Hessian2, attackers craft malicious JSON payloads that trigger RCE during deserialization.
  • Likelihood: High (if using a vulnerable version and exposed to untrusted input) / Medium (if using a patched version but with weak input validation)
  • Impact: Very High (RCE)
  • Effort: Medium (finding and exploiting a known vulnerability) / High (discovering and exploiting a 0-day)
  • Skill Level: Intermediate (using existing exploits) / Expert (finding new vulnerabilities)
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium (if using standard security monitoring) / Hard (if the attacker is careful)
  • Mitigation:
    • Use the latest, patched version of Fastjson.
    • Avoid deserializing data from untrusted sources.
    • Implement strict whitelisting of allowed classes/types during deserialization.
    • Perform rigorous input validation before deserialization.

Attack Tree Path: Unauthenticated Access/Bypass (Telnet, HTTP) ([CRITICAL])

  • Description: Attackers gain direct access to Dubbo services through exposed Telnet or HTTP interfaces without proper authentication. This allows them to invoke methods, potentially leading to RCE or information disclosure.
  • Likelihood: Medium (if misconfigured or exposed) / Low (if properly secured)
  • Impact: High (RCE or information disclosure)
  • Effort: Very Low (if unauthenticated) / Low (if weak authentication)
  • Skill Level: Novice (if unauthenticated) / Intermediate (if bypassing weak authentication)
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy (if monitoring network traffic and access logs)
  • Mitigation:
    • Implement strong authentication and authorization for all Dubbo services, including Telnet and HTTP interfaces.
    • Disable unnecessary protocols (especially Telnet) if not required.
    • Use network segmentation and firewalls to restrict access to Dubbo services.

Attack Tree Path: Registry Poisoning / Fake Provider Registration ([HIGH RISK], [CRITICAL])

  • Description: Attackers compromise the service registry (e.g., ZooKeeper, Nacos) and register malicious service providers. Consumers then unknowingly connect to these fake providers, leading to RCE or data exfiltration.
  • Likelihood: Low (requires compromising the registry itself)
  • Impact: Very High (RCE or data exfiltration)
  • Effort: High (compromising the registry)
  • Skill Level: Advanced / Expert
  • Detection Difficulty: Hard (requires monitoring registry activity and integrity)
  • Mitigation:
    • Implement strong authentication and access control for the service registry.
    • Use network segmentation to isolate the registry.
    • Regularly audit the security of the registry.
    • Monitor registry activity for suspicious behavior.