Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
67 lines (53 loc) · 6.12 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

67 lines (53 loc) · 6.12 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for apache/httpcomponents-client

Objective: Execute Arbitrary Code, Steal Data, or Disrupt Communication via Apache HttpComponents Client

Attack Tree Visualization

                                      Attacker's Goal:
                                      Execute Arbitrary Code, Steal Data, or Disrupt Communication
                                      via Apache HttpComponents Client
                                                  |
          -----------------------------------------------------------------
          |                                                                |
  1.  Exploit Vulnerabilities in                                  2. Manipulate Client Configuration (Implicit High Risk)
      HttpComponents Client                                                (Not shown in tree, but crucial)
          |
  ------------------------
  |       |      |
1.1     1.2    1.3
CVE-    CVE-    RCE
XXXX    YYYY    via
(Old    (Old    Unserialization
Ver)    Ver)    (if vuln used)
[HIGH   [HIGH
 RISK]   RISK]
[CRIT-  [CRIT-
 ICAL]   ICAL]
         [CRITICAL]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Exploit Vulnerabilities in HttpComponents Client

This is the primary branch containing identified high-risk and critical nodes.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1 CVE-XXXX (Old Version) [HIGH RISK] [CRITICAL]

  • Description: Exploiting a known, publicly disclosed vulnerability (represented by a hypothetical CVE number) in an outdated version of the Apache HttpComponents Client library.
  • Likelihood: Very High. Many organizations are slow to update dependencies, and publicly known vulnerabilities are actively scanned for and exploited.
  • Impact: High/Very High. The impact depends on the specific CVE. Many CVEs in HTTP client libraries can lead to Remote Code Execution (RCE), complete data breaches, or other severe consequences.
  • Effort: Low. Exploits for known vulnerabilities are often publicly available (e.g., Metasploit modules, exploit-db). Attackers can often automate the scanning and exploitation process.
  • Skill Level: Novice/Intermediate. Using pre-built exploits requires minimal skill (script kiddie level). Developing a new exploit for a known vulnerability might require intermediate skills.
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy/Medium. Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS), Web Application Firewalls (WAFs), and vulnerability scanners often have signatures for known CVEs. However, attackers can use obfuscation techniques to make detection harder.

Attack Tree Path: 1.2 CVE-YYYY (Old Version) [HIGH RISK] [CRITICAL]

  • Description: Identical in nature to 1.1, but representing a different hypothetical known vulnerability in an outdated version. The repetition emphasizes the ongoing threat from unpatched vulnerabilities.
  • Likelihood, Impact, Effort, Skill Level, Detection Difficulty: Same as 1.1.

Attack Tree Path: 1.3 RCE via Unserialization (if vuln used) [CRITICAL]

  • Description: Achieving Remote Code Execution (RCE) by exploiting a vulnerability related to the deserialization of untrusted data if a vulnerable version of HttpComponents Client is used and the application using the client deserializes untrusted data via the client. This is a more specific and complex scenario than simply using an outdated version.
  • Likelihood: Medium. This requires a combination of factors: a vulnerable version, the application's use of the client for deserialization, and the attacker's ability to provide malicious input.
  • Impact: Very High. RCE allows the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the application server, granting them complete control.
  • Effort: Medium. The attacker needs to identify the vulnerable deserialization point within the application's use of the client and craft a suitable exploit payload.
  • Skill Level: Advanced. Requires a good understanding of Java serialization, object-oriented programming, and exploit development techniques.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium/Hard. Detecting this type of attack can be challenging without specific monitoring for deserialization vulnerabilities or unusual process behavior after exploitation.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Manipulate Client Configuration (Implicit High Risk and Critical)

  • (Specifically: Disable SSL/TLS Verification): * Description: Although not explicitly represented as a node in the extracted sub-tree (because it's a configuration issue rather than a direct library vulnerability), this is a critically important and high-risk scenario. If an attacker can influence the client's configuration to disable SSL/TLS certificate verification, they can perform Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks. * Likelihood: Low/Medium. The likelihood depends on how the application manages its configuration and whether there are any vulnerabilities (e.g., injection flaws) that allow an attacker to modify the configuration. * Impact: Very High. Disabling SSL/TLS verification completely undermines the security of HTTPS, allowing the attacker to intercept, read, and modify all communication between the application and the remote server. This can lead to complete data breaches, credential theft, and session hijacking. * Effort: Medium. The attacker needs to find a way to modify the client's configuration, which might involve exploiting other vulnerabilities or leveraging misconfigurations. * Skill Level: Intermediate. Requires understanding of how HttpComponents Client is configured and how to exploit potential configuration vulnerabilities. * Detection Difficulty: Medium/Hard. Detecting this can be difficult without specific monitoring for configuration changes or unusual network traffic patterns (e.g., unexpected certificate authorities).