You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Description: Kafka broker ports (e.g., 9092) are exposed to the network without proper access controls, allowing unauthorized connections.
Kafka Contribution: Kafka requires network ports to be open for producers, consumers, and inter-broker communication, inherently creating network exposure.
Example: Kafka broker port 9092 is directly accessible from the public internet without firewall rules or network segmentation.
Impact: Unauthorized access to Kafka cluster, potential data breaches, denial of service attacks, cluster disruption.
Risk Severity: High
Mitigation Strategies:
Implement firewall rules to restrict access to Kafka ports to only trusted networks and clients.
Utilize network segmentation to isolate Kafka brokers within a secure network zone.
Consider using a VPN or private network for Kafka client connections.
Description: Kafka's default configuration lacks authentication and authorization, allowing any client to connect and perform actions.
Kafka Contribution: Kafka, by default, does not enforce authentication or authorization, requiring explicit configuration for security.
Example: An attacker connects to the Kafka broker without any credentials and is able to produce messages to sensitive topics or consume data without permission.
Impact: Unauthorized data access, data injection, data corruption, compliance violations, potential for malicious activities within the application.
Risk Severity: Critical
Mitigation Strategies:
Enable authentication mechanisms such as SASL/PLAIN, SASL/SCRAM, or Kerberos.
Implement Kafka ACLs (Access Control Lists) to define granular authorization rules for topics, consumer groups, and cluster operations.
Follow the principle of least privilege when configuring ACLs.
Description: Data transmitted between Kafka clients and brokers, or between brokers, is sent in plaintext without encryption.
Kafka Contribution: Kafka communication, by default, is not encrypted and requires explicit configuration of TLS/SSL for secure communication.
Example: Sensitive data is transmitted in plaintext between a producer application and a Kafka broker, and a network attacker eavesdrops on the traffic to capture the data.
Impact: Data breaches due to eavesdropping, exposure of sensitive information in transit, non-compliance with data protection regulations.
Risk Severity: High
Mitigation Strategies:
Enable TLS/SSL encryption for all Kafka listeners, including client-broker and inter-broker communication.
Ensure proper certificate management and validation for TLS/SSL configurations.
Description: Software vulnerabilities present in Kafka brokers, ZooKeeper/Kraft, Kafka Connect, Kafka Streams, or their dependencies (e.g., JRE, libraries).
Kafka Contribution: Kafka, like any software, is susceptible to vulnerabilities, and its reliance on dependencies introduces further potential vulnerabilities.
Example: A known vulnerability in an older version of Kafka broker or the underlying Java Runtime Environment (JRE) is exploited by an attacker to gain remote code execution.
Impact: System compromise, data breaches, denial of service, data corruption, depending on the nature of the vulnerability.
Risk Severity: High to Critical
Mitigation Strategies:
Keep Kafka and all its components updated to the latest stable versions.
Regularly apply security patches and updates released by the Apache Kafka project and its dependency providers.
Implement vulnerability scanning and management processes.
Description: Incorrectly configuring critical security features like TLS/SSL, SASL, or ACLs, rendering them ineffective or creating new vulnerabilities that lead to high impact.
Kafka Contribution: Kafka's security features are powerful but require careful and correct configuration to be effective, and critical misconfigurations can negate their benefits leading to high risk.
Example: TLS/SSL is enabled, but certificate validation is disabled, making the connection vulnerable to man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks despite using encryption. ACLs are set up but are overly permissive granting wide access.
Impact: Bypassing intended security controls, data breaches, unauthorized access, potential for exploitation due to weakened security posture.
Risk Severity: High
Mitigation Strategies:
Thoroughly test and validate security configurations after implementation and changes.
Follow official documentation and best practices when configuring security features.
Conduct security audits and penetration testing to identify misconfigurations and weaknesses.
Description: High severity vulnerabilities in third-party Kafka Connect connectors used to integrate Kafka with external systems, that can directly impact Kafka or connected systems.
Kafka Contribution: Kafka Connect's extensibility through connectors introduces a dependency on external code, which may contain high severity vulnerabilities exploitable through Kafka Connect.
Example: A vulnerable Kafka Connect connector has a remote code execution vulnerability that can be triggered by a malicious message processed by the connector, leading to compromise of the Kafka Connect worker and potentially Kafka cluster.
Impact: Data breaches in connected systems, compromise of Kafka Connect workers, potential for lateral movement to other parts of the application infrastructure, denial of service.
Risk Severity: High
Mitigation Strategies:
Carefully vet and select Kafka Connect connectors from trusted and reputable sources.
Keep connectors updated to the latest versions and apply security patches, especially for high severity vulnerabilities.
Regularly audit and monitor connectors for known vulnerabilities and security updates.