Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
240 lines (202 loc) · 18.6 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

240 lines (202 loc) · 18.6 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for apache/kafka

Objective: Compromise Application using Apache Kafka vulnerabilities (High-Risk Paths Only).

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Application via Kafka **[ROOT GOAL]**
├───(OR)─ Exploit Kafka Broker Vulnerabilities **[HIGH RISK]**
│   ├───(OR)─ Exploit Known Kafka Broker Software Vulnerabilities **[HIGH RISK]** **[CRITICAL NODE]**
│   │   └───(OR)─ Exploit Applicable CVE (e.g., Remote Code Execution, Denial of Service) **[CRITICAL NODE]**
│   └───(OR)─ Denial of Service (DoS) against Kafka Broker **[HIGH RISK]**
│       ├───(OR)─ Resource Exhaustion Attack **[HIGH RISK]**
│           │   ├───(AND)─ Send Malicious or Excessive Requests
│           │   │   ├───(OR)─ Produce Large Volume of Messages to Topics **[HIGH RISK]**
│           │   │   │   └───(AND)─ Gain Producer Access (See "Exploit Producer Access") **[CRITICAL NODE]**
├───(OR)─ Exploit Zookeeper Vulnerabilities (Kafka Dependency) **[HIGH RISK]**
│   ├───(OR)─ Exploit Known Zookeeper Software Vulnerabilities **[HIGH RISK]** **[CRITICAL NODE]**
│   │   └───(OR)─ Exploit Applicable CVE (e.g., Remote Code Execution, Denial of Service) **[CRITICAL NODE]**
│   └───(OR)─ Zookeeper Misconfiguration Exploitation **[HIGH RISK]**
│       ├───(OR)─ Unsecured Zookeeper Access **[HIGH RISK]** **[CRITICAL NODE]**
│           │   └───(AND)─ Use Zookeeper CLI or API to Manipulate Kafka Metadata **[HIGH RISK]**
│           │       ├───(OR)─ Disrupt Kafka Cluster Operation (e.g., delete topics, partitions) **[HIGH RISK]**
│           │       └───(AND)─ Data Corruption in Zookeeper (Leading to Kafka Instability)
│           │           └───(AND)─ Gain Write Access to Zookeeper (See "Unsecured Zookeeper Access") **[CRITICAL NODE]**
├───(OR)─ Exploit Producer Access **[HIGH RISK]** **[CRITICAL NODE]**
│   ├───(OR)─ Compromise Producer Application/Service **[HIGH RISK]**
│   │   └───(AND)─ Exploit Vulnerabilities in Application Code that Produces Messages **[HIGH RISK]**
│   └───(OR)─ Exploit Weak or Missing Producer Authentication/Authorization **[HIGH RISK]** **[CRITICAL NODE]**
│       ├───(OR)─ Missing Authentication **[HIGH RISK]**
│           │   └───(AND)─ Kafka Cluster Configured without Authentication for Producers **[HIGH RISK]**
│           │   └───(AND)─ Produce Malicious Messages to Kafka Topics **[HIGH RISK]**
│           │       ├───(OR)─ Message Injection/Poisoning (See "Message Payload Manipulation") **[HIGH RISK]**
│           │       └───(OR)─ Topic Flooding (DoS) (See "Broker DoS") **[HIGH RISK]**
│       └───(OR)─ Weak Authentication (e.g., Default Credentials, Weak Passwords)
│           └───(AND)─ Produce Malicious Messages (See "Message Payload Manipulation") **[HIGH RISK]**
├───(OR)─ Exploit Consumer Access **[HIGH RISK]** **[CRITICAL NODE]**
│   ├───(OR)─ Compromise Consumer Application/Service **[HIGH RISK]**
│   │   └───(AND)─ Exploit Vulnerabilities in Application Code that Consumes Messages **[HIGH RISK]**
│   └───(OR)─ Exploit Weak or Missing Consumer Authentication/Authorization **[HIGH RISK]** **[CRITICAL NODE]**
│       ├───(OR)─ Missing Authentication **[HIGH RISK]**
│           │   └───(AND)─ Kafka Cluster Configured without Authentication for Consumers **[HIGH RISK]**
│           │   └───(AND)─ Consume Sensitive Messages from Kafka Topics **[HIGH RISK]**
│           │       └───(OR)─ Data Breach (Exfiltration of Sensitive Information) **[HIGH RISK]**
├───(OR)─ Exploit Message Payload Manipulation **[HIGH RISK]**
│   ├───(OR)─ Message Injection/Poisoning (via Compromised Producer or Unsecured Producer Access) **[HIGH RISK]** **[CRITICAL NODE]**
│       │   └───(AND)─ Inject Malicious Payloads into Kafka Messages **[HIGH RISK]**
│       │       └───(AND)─ Application Vulnerable to Malicious Payloads **[HIGH RISK]** **[CRITICAL NODE]**
│           │           ├───(OR)─ Code Injection in Consumer Application (via message content) **[HIGH RISK]**
├───(OR)─ Exploit Lack of Encryption (Data in Transit) **[HIGH RISK]**
│   ├───(OR)─ Network Sniffing (Man-in-the-Middle Attack) **[HIGH RISK]**
│       │   └───(AND)─ Kafka Communication Unencrypted (No TLS/SSL) **[HIGH RISK]** **[CRITICAL NODE]**
│           │   └───(AND)─ Capture and Analyze Kafka Messages **[HIGH RISK]**
│           │       ├───(OR)─ Data Breach (Exfiltration of Sensitive Information in Messages) **[HIGH RISK]**
├───(OR)─ Exploit Metadata Manipulation (via Zookeeper or Broker API if exposed) **[HIGH RISK]**
│   ├───(OR)─ Topic Deletion/Modification **[HIGH RISK]**
│       │   └───(AND)─ Gain Access to Zookeeper or Broker Admin API (See "Exploit Zookeeper Vulnerabilities", "Broker API Misconfiguration") **[CRITICAL NODE]**
│       │       └───(AND)─ Delete or Modify Critical Kafka Topics **[HIGH RISK]**
│           │       ├───(OR)─ Data Loss **[HIGH RISK]**
│           │       └───(OR)─ Application Functionality Disruption **[HIGH RISK]**
└───(OR)─ Social Engineering against Kafka Administrators/Developers **[HIGH RISK]**
    └───(AND)─ Phishing, Pretexting, or other Social Engineering Techniques **[HIGH RISK]**
        └───(AND)─ Gain Access to Kafka Credentials, Configuration, or Systems **[CRITICAL NODE]**

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Known Kafka Broker Software Vulnerabilities

Attack Vector: Exploiting publicly known Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) in the Kafka Broker software.

  • Likelihood: Medium to High (depending on patching practices).
  • Impact: High to Critical (Remote Code Execution, Denial of Service, Data Breach).
  • Mitigation:
    • Keep Kafka Broker software up-to-date with the latest security patches.
    • Implement a robust vulnerability management program.
    • Regularly scan for vulnerabilities and remediate them promptly.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Applicable CVE (Kafka Broker & Zookeeper)

Attack Vector: Utilizing exploit code (publicly available or custom-developed) to leverage identified CVEs in Kafka Broker or Zookeeper.

  • Likelihood: Medium (if vulnerabilities exist and are not patched).
  • Impact: High to Critical (Remote Code Execution, Denial of Service, Data Breach, Cluster Compromise).
  • Mitigation:
    • Promptly apply security patches for Kafka and Zookeeper.
    • Implement intrusion detection and prevention systems (IDS/IPS).
    • Conduct regular penetration testing to identify exploitable vulnerabilities.

Attack Tree Path: Denial of Service (DoS) against Kafka Broker via Resource Exhaustion

Attack Vector: Overwhelming the Kafka Broker with excessive requests, specifically by producing a large volume of messages to topics.

  • Likelihood: Medium to High (if producer access is gained or authentication is missing).
  • Impact: High (Kafka Broker unavailability, application disruption).
  • Mitigation:
    • Implement strong producer authentication and authorization (ACLs).
    • Configure resource quotas and limits in Kafka to prevent resource exhaustion.
    • Implement rate limiting and throttling in producer applications.
    • Monitor Kafka Broker resource utilization and set up alerts for anomalies.

Attack Tree Path: Gain Producer Access

Attack Vector: Compromising producer applications or exploiting weak/missing producer authentication to gain unauthorized producer access. This is a prerequisite for several other high-risk attacks.

  • Likelihood: Medium to High (depending on application security and authentication configuration).
  • Impact: N/A (Prerequisite for further attacks).
  • Mitigation:
    • Secure producer applications against vulnerabilities (code injection, etc.).
    • Implement strong authentication and authorization for producers (SASL/PLAIN, SASL/SCRAM, TLS Client Authentication).
    • Regularly audit producer access controls and credentials.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Zookeeper Misconfiguration - Unsecured Zookeeper Access

Attack Vector: Exploiting misconfigurations in Zookeeper, particularly lack of authentication and open network access, to gain unauthorized control over Zookeeper.

  • Likelihood: Low to Medium (if security best practices are not followed).
  • Impact: High to Critical (Kafka cluster disruption, data loss, metadata manipulation).
  • Mitigation:
    • Restrict network access to Zookeeper ports using firewalls.
    • Implement authentication and authorization for Zookeeper (if feasible and applicable).
    • Regularly audit Zookeeper configuration for security misconfigurations.

Attack Tree Path: Use Zookeeper CLI or API to Manipulate Kafka Metadata

Attack Vector: Once unsecured Zookeeper access is gained, using Zookeeper's command-line interface (CLI) or API to directly manipulate Kafka metadata.

  • Likelihood: High (if unsecured Zookeeper access is achieved).
  • Impact: High to Critical (Kafka cluster disruption, data loss, topic deletion, partition manipulation).
  • Mitigation:
    • Secure Zookeeper access as described above.
    • Implement monitoring and alerting for Zookeeper metadata changes.
    • Regularly backup Kafka metadata.

Attack Tree Path: Disrupt Kafka Cluster Operation (via Zookeeper Manipulation)

Attack Vector: Leveraging Zookeeper metadata manipulation to disrupt Kafka cluster operations, such as deleting critical topics or partitions.

  • Likelihood: High (if Zookeeper metadata manipulation is possible).
  • Impact: Critical (Data loss, application outage, service disruption).
  • Mitigation:
    • Secure Zookeeper access to prevent metadata manipulation.
    • Implement robust Kafka monitoring and alerting to detect cluster disruptions.
    • Have disaster recovery plans in place for cluster failures and data loss.

Attack Tree Path: Gain Write Access to Zookeeper

Attack Vector: Achieving write access to Zookeeper nodes, often through unsecured Zookeeper access, to inject malicious or corrupted data.

  • Likelihood: Low to Medium (requires unsecured Zookeeper access and Zookeeper knowledge).
  • Impact: Critical (Kafka cluster instability, data corruption, unpredictable behavior).
  • Mitigation:
    • Secure Zookeeper access to prevent unauthorized write access.
    • Implement integrity checks for Zookeeper data (if possible).
    • Monitor Zookeeper for unexpected data modifications.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Vulnerabilities in Application Code that Produces/Consumes Messages

Attack Vector: Exploiting common application vulnerabilities (code injection, buffer overflows, deserialization flaws, logic bugs) in producer or consumer applications.

  • Likelihood: Medium (common application security risks).
  • Impact: High (Application compromise, data manipulation, potential Remote Code Execution).
  • Mitigation:
    • Apply secure coding practices in producer and consumer applications.
    • Conduct regular security code reviews and static/dynamic analysis.
    • Implement robust input validation and sanitization.
    • Use safe deserialization practices and formats.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Weak or Missing Producer/Consumer Authentication/Authorization

Attack Vector: Exploiting Kafka clusters configured without authentication or with weak authentication mechanisms for producers and consumers.

  • Likelihood: Low to Medium (if security best practices are not followed).
  • Impact: High to Critical (Unrestricted producer/consumer access, message injection, data breaches, DoS).
  • Mitigation:
    • Always enable and enforce strong authentication for producers and consumers (SASL/PLAIN, SASL/SCRAM, TLS Client Authentication).
    • Configure granular ACLs to restrict access based on the principle of least privilege.
    • Regularly audit authentication and authorization configurations.

Attack Tree Path: Kafka Cluster Configured without Authentication for Producers/Consumers

Attack Vector: Directly exploiting Kafka clusters that are intentionally or unintentionally configured without any authentication mechanisms for clients.

  • Likelihood: Low (but severe if misconfigured).
  • Impact: High to Critical (Unrestricted access, data breaches, DoS, message manipulation).
  • Mitigation:
    • Never deploy a production Kafka cluster without authentication enabled.
    • Enforce authentication as a mandatory security requirement.
    • Regularly audit Kafka cluster configuration to ensure authentication is enabled.

Attack Tree Path: Produce/Consume Malicious Messages to Kafka Topics

Attack Vector: Injecting malicious messages into Kafka topics (via compromised producer or unsecured access) or consuming sensitive messages without authorization (via compromised consumer or unsecured access).

  • Likelihood: High (if producer/consumer access is compromised or authentication is missing).
  • Impact: Medium to Critical (Message injection/poisoning, data breaches, application compromise).
  • Mitigation:
    • Secure producer and consumer access as described above.
    • Implement input validation and sanitization in producer applications.
    • Implement output validation and secure message processing in consumer applications.
    • Consider message content scanning for malicious payloads (if applicable).

Attack Tree Path: Message Injection/Poisoning & Code Injection in Consumer Application

Attack Vector: Injecting malicious payloads into Kafka messages that, when processed by vulnerable consumer applications, lead to code injection or other application compromises.

  • Likelihood: Medium (if consumer applications are vulnerable and message content is not properly handled).
  • Impact: High to Critical (Consumer application compromise, Remote Code Execution, data manipulation).
  • Mitigation:
    • Secure consumer applications against code injection vulnerabilities.
    • Implement robust input validation and sanitization for message content in consumer applications.
    • Use safe deserialization practices and formats.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Lack of Encryption (Data in Transit) - Kafka Communication Unencrypted (No TLS/SSL)

Attack Vector: Exploiting the lack of encryption (TLS/SSL) for Kafka communication to perform network sniffing and Man-in-the-Middle attacks.

  • Likelihood: Low to Medium (if encryption is not enabled).
  • Impact: High to Critical (Data breaches, exfiltration of sensitive information in messages, credential theft).
  • Mitigation:
    • Always enable TLS/SSL encryption for all Kafka communication (client-broker, broker-broker, broker-zookeeper).
    • Enforce encryption as a mandatory security requirement.
    • Regularly audit Kafka cluster configuration to ensure encryption is enabled.

Attack Tree Path: Capture and Analyze Kafka Messages (Unencrypted)

Attack Vector: Capturing and analyzing unencrypted Kafka messages via network sniffing to steal sensitive data or credentials.

  • Likelihood: High (if Kafka communication is unencrypted and network access is possible).
  • Impact: High to Critical (Data breaches, exfiltration of sensitive information, credential theft).
  • Mitigation:
    • Enable TLS/SSL encryption for all Kafka communication.
    • Implement network segmentation and access controls to limit network access to Kafka traffic.
    • Monitor network traffic for suspicious activity and unencrypted protocols.

Attack Tree Path: Topic Deletion/Modification

Attack Vector: Deleting or modifying critical Kafka topics via unauthorized access to Zookeeper or Broker Admin API.

  • Likelihood: Low to Medium (if admin access is compromised).
  • Impact: Critical (Data loss, application functionality disruption, service outage).
  • Mitigation:
    • Secure Zookeeper and Broker Admin API access.
    • Implement strong authentication and authorization for administrative operations.
    • Implement topic deletion protection and backups.
    • Monitor and audit administrative actions on Kafka topics.

Attack Tree Path: Social Engineering against Kafka Administrators/Developers

Attack Vector: Using social engineering techniques (phishing, pretexting) to target Kafka administrators or developers to gain access to Kafka credentials, configurations, or systems.

  • Likelihood: Medium (human factor vulnerability).
  • Impact: High to Critical (System compromise, data access, enabling any of the above attacks).
  • Mitigation:
    • Implement security awareness training for Kafka administrators and developers.
    • Promote a security-conscious culture.
    • Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) for administrative access.
    • Regularly test and improve social engineering defenses.